Benchmark scores unreasonably slow, help! - Page 2

Sazar · 01-29-03, 07:33 PM

does it really outperform it ?

hmm... well I oc'd the rig a tad... 10mhz fsb

and thats it...

my video card is running stock other than a slight oc based on the increased fsb...

I am not in the habit of oc'ing for the sake of getting a bangup score and then going back to stock settings or whatever

that score reflects my system on a day to day basis when I choose to bump up the fsb...

my stock score for my card/rig is around 12.2k 3dmarks...

post your STOCK scores and then we'll have a chat

k just checked your compare... yah yer running a little faster than I am aren't you

disregard the above

LORD-eX-Bu · 01-29-03, 07:38 PM

here is my stock speed

13,023

By stock I mean, nothing overclocked

I use the 2.53 Ghz oc'd setup from time to time

Sazar · 01-29-03, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [eNv]-LORD-eX-Bu
here is my stock speed

13,023

By stock I mean, nothing overclocked I use the 2.53 Ghz oc'd setup from time to time

here is mine stock with older drivers... I will bench it sometime when I format my computer later in feb with teh 3.0's

12228

I just cna't believe that an fsb oc of 7 mhz netted such a tiny increase in 3dmarks for your card btw... a 10mhz increase for me nets around 1000 points... and I run my rig @ 2100+ speeds on a regular basis..

still am trying to figure out why my nature score is so high compared to many other systems... incl ones with a 9700pro...

LORD-eX-Bu · 01-29-03, 07:45 PM

thats cool, I'll see if I can get around to benching with these new drivers, I haven't gotten around to doing it in a while

I don't know why the score didn't go up higher, I was working on getting it to 14k, but MSI 648 MAX isn't a great overclocker by any means

Sazar · 01-29-03, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [eNv]-LORD-eX-Bu
thats cool, I'll see if I can get around to benching with these new drivers, I haven't gotten around to doing it in a while

I don't know why the score didn't go up higher, I was working on getting it to 14k, but MSI 648 MAX isn't a great overclocker by any means

I hear you

am wiating on my summer upgrade to a barton/nforce2 style platform... should be fine since my memory should synch perfectly with a 166mhz fsb

Mortur · 01-29-03, 08:18 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5783827

This is at defaults for everything with all programs shut off, with memory scrubbed clean of leaks with mem-turbo, which was closed durring the test.

Score: 2157

legion88 · 02-15-03, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mortur
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5783827

This is at defaults for everything with all programs shut off, with memory scrubbed clean of leaks with mem-turbo, which was closed durring the test.

Score: 2157

Are you sure you do not have FSAA or aniso enabled? Your fillrate scores as well as all the other theoretical tests are well below what a GF4 440MX should be (around 1.5 to 5 times lower depending on the test).

Are you sure that the clock speeds of the card are set to default and not lowered?

Are you sure the card is not defective?

Mortur · 02-15-03, 06:05 PM

Yes to all of those, but of course, not if the card is defective.

my other video cards were acting slow, but i had nothing to prove it against... so i guess its somehting else...

01-29-03, 07:33 PM	#13
Sazar Sayonara !!! Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Austin, Texas Posts: 9,297	does it really outperform it ? hmm... well I oc'd the rig a tad... 10mhz fsb and thats it... my video card is running stock other than a slight oc based on the increased fsb... I am not in the habit of oc'ing for the sake of getting a bangup score and then going back to stock settings or whatever that score reflects my system on a day to day basis when I choose to bump up the fsb... my stock score for my card/rig is around 12.2k 3dmarks... post your STOCK scores and then we'll have a chat k just checked your compare... yah yer running a little faster than I am aren't you disregard the above __________________ Help to find cures for Alzheimer's, Mad Cow (BSE), CJD, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease, and many Cancers. Folding@Home - Is it in you? Last edited by Sazar; 01-29-03 at 07:39 PM.

01-29-03, 07:38 PM	#14
LORD-eX-Bu Horus the pointy master Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Salt Lake City, UT Posts: 4,609	here is my stock speed 13,023 By stock I mean, nothing overclocked I use the 2.53 Ghz oc'd setup from time to time __________________ ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

01-29-03, 07:45 PM	#16
LORD-eX-Bu Horus the pointy master Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Salt Lake City, UT Posts: 4,609	thats cool, I'll see if I can get around to benching with these new drivers, I haven't gotten around to doing it in a while I don't know why the score didn't go up higher, I was working on getting it to 14k, but MSI 648 MAX isn't a great overclocker by any means __________________ ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark	News	Latest Tech And Game Headlines	0	05-28-12 08:00 PM
Gnome3 with composite is very slow on Geforce FX 5200 with 173.14.31 driver	Artox	NVIDIA Linux	0	05-26-12 10:33 AM
Very slow X startup	Jeremy	NVIDIA Linux	96	05-23-03 10:11 AM
Anyone benchmark KT266, KT266A, KT333 and KT400?	Needa916	CPUs, Motherboards And Memory	7	10-09-02 08:34 AM
3d benchmark se	cricket	Benchmarking And Overclocking	3	08-30-02 11:02 PM

01-29-03, 08:18 PM	#18
Mortur Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 8	http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5783827 This is at defaults for everything with all programs shut off, with memory scrubbed clean of leaks with mem-turbo, which was closed durring the test. Score: 2157

02-15-03, 06:05 PM	#20
Mortur Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 8	Yes to all of those, but of course, not if the card is defective. my other video cards were acting slow, but i had nothing to prove it against... so i guess its somehting else...