Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-29-03, 07:33 PM   #13
Sazar
Sayonara !!!
 
Sazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
Default

does it really outperform it ?


hmm... well I oc'd the rig a tad... 10mhz fsb and thats it...

my video card is running stock other than a slight oc based on the increased fsb...

I am not in the habit of oc'ing for the sake of getting a bangup score and then going back to stock settings or whatever

that score reflects my system on a day to day basis when I choose to bump up the fsb...

my stock score for my card/rig is around 12.2k 3dmarks...

post your STOCK scores and then we'll have a chat

k just checked your compare... yah yer running a little faster than I am aren't you

disregard the above

Last edited by Sazar; 01-29-03 at 07:39 PM.
Sazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 07:38 PM   #14
LORD-eX-Bu
Horus the pointy master
 
LORD-eX-Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,609
Talking

here is my stock speed

13,023

By stock I mean, nothing overclocked I use the 2.53 Ghz oc'd setup from time to time
__________________
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=171&dateline=12152329  84
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
LORD-eX-Bu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 07:40 PM   #15
Sazar
Sayonara !!!
 
Sazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by [eNv]-LORD-eX-Bu
here is my stock speed

13,023

By stock I mean, nothing overclocked I use the 2.53 Ghz oc'd setup from time to time
here is mine stock with older drivers... I will bench it sometime when I format my computer later in feb with teh 3.0's

12228

I just cna't believe that an fsb oc of 7 mhz netted such a tiny increase in 3dmarks for your card btw... a 10mhz increase for me nets around 1000 points... and I run my rig @ 2100+ speeds on a regular basis..

still am trying to figure out why my nature score is so high compared to many other systems... incl ones with a 9700pro...
Sazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 07:45 PM   #16
LORD-eX-Bu
Horus the pointy master
 
LORD-eX-Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,609
Default

thats cool, I'll see if I can get around to benching with these new drivers, I haven't gotten around to doing it in a while

I don't know why the score didn't go up higher, I was working on getting it to 14k, but MSI 648 MAX isn't a great overclocker by any means
__________________
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=171&dateline=12152329  84
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
LORD-eX-Bu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 07:52 PM   #17
Sazar
Sayonara !!!
 
Sazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by [eNv]-LORD-eX-Bu
thats cool, I'll see if I can get around to benching with these new drivers, I haven't gotten around to doing it in a while

I don't know why the score didn't go up higher, I was working on getting it to 14k, but MSI 648 MAX isn't a great overclocker by any means
I hear you

am wiating on my summer upgrade to a barton/nforce2 style platform... should be fine since my memory should synch perfectly with a 166mhz fsb
Sazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 08:18 PM   #18
Mortur
Registered User
 
Mortur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8
Send a message via AIM to Mortur Send a message via Yahoo to Mortur
Default

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5783827

This is at defaults for everything with all programs shut off, with memory scrubbed clean of leaks with mem-turbo, which was closed durring the test.

Score: 2157
Mortur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-03, 06:03 PM   #19
legion88
WhatIfSports.com Junkie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mortur
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5783827

This is at defaults for everything with all programs shut off, with memory scrubbed clean of leaks with mem-turbo, which was closed durring the test.

Score: 2157
Are you sure you do not have FSAA or aniso enabled? Your fillrate scores as well as all the other theoretical tests are well below what a GF4 440MX should be (around 1.5 to 5 times lower depending on the test).

Are you sure that the clock speeds of the card are set to default and not lowered?

Are you sure the card is not defective?
legion88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-03, 06:05 PM   #20
Mortur
Registered User
 
Mortur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8
Send a message via AIM to Mortur Send a message via Yahoo to Mortur
Default

Yes to all of those, but of course, not if the card is defective.

my other video cards were acting slow, but i had nothing to prove it against... so i guess its somehting else...
Mortur is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 08:00 PM
Gnome3 with composite is very slow on Geforce FX 5200 with 173.14.31 driver Artox NVIDIA Linux 0 05-26-12 10:33 AM
Very slow X startup Jeremy NVIDIA Linux 96 05-23-03 10:11 AM
Anyone benchmark KT266, KT266A, KT333 and KT400? Needa916 CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 7 10-09-02 08:34 AM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-30-02 11:02 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.