|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
|
I see that monarch and newegg are selling 7600GT cards from numerous vendors. When should a linux driver be available?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,763
|
As was discussed in other threads, the next driver release will support the GeForce 7600GT.
Thanks, Lonni |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
__________________
Asus A8N32-SLI : AMD64 3700+ @ 2.85GHz : 2GB PC4000 OCZ Platinum EB : 2x 7800GT SLI |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 623
|
You both have right. However like the others here we rather expect less volatile answer from Nvidia.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
SIMILAR SITUATION: Q: When are you going to call him? A: Yes, I am going to call him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
|
Yea, I just bought a 7900 GTX and lost my X display because of it - no drivers... I'd very much like to know *when* drivers will be out as if it's not soon, I'm putting my old video card back in - but that's a lot of trouble I'd rather not go through if they'll be out in an hour or tomorrow or some time...
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13
|
Phoronix has posted:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,763
|
phaseburn,
The next driver release will not be today or tomorrow (or this week). It will be several weeks from now. Thanks, Lonni |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
|
Well thank you Lonni for a very specific answer. While I'm not overly happy about the release date, I'd like to say that I'm much happier with at least knowing. Very much appreciated. Overall, you guys do go the extra mile for us linux users, and I'm happy to support nVidia - If you need a beta tester for 'em, btw, I'd be happy to test :-P (I run gentoo linux)
In the future, just as a suggestion, (yes, I know it's not feasable to withhold a product for a driver on a platform that few people (in terms of a percentage base) use), maybe an announcement to the community (a sticky thread for instance here would have done wonders - I'd have checked an hour after giving up on the 8178 drivers and been back up and running on my old card last night, rather than waiting and spending a couple hours looking to see if maybe I missed something, etc) would be of major help. When a product is so new that few people who use linux have one (I got mine the 10th) that there's few posts about it on the forums, it can be a little difficult to find any suggestions, answers, etc. It took me a few trips to slashdot, Phoronix, and a couple other sites to realize that the drivers themself didn't support the card. So a sticky would have just gone a long way, even if you don't have an ETA on a driver release - just something stating "BTW, the 8178 series won't support these cards - next driver release will support X, Y, and Z, and we're hoping to release it soon" would go a very long way. Anyway, thanks again for the answer, Lonni, and thanks for listening. -David phaseburn at phaseburn period net |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Foxie
|
...Went to sleep indeed...
__________________
Gaming: Intel i7 980X @ 4GHz | ASUS Rampage III Extreme | GTX 480 3Way SLI @ 900Mhz | Koolance VID-NX480 | Corsair Obsidian 700D Corsair H70 CPU Cooler | EK-FB RE3 | Corsair AX1200 | Black Ice SR1 360 | 240GB OCZ Revodrive X2 SSD | Windows 7 Ultimate 12GB Corsair Dominator GT @ 8-8-8-24-1T DDR3-1600 | Onkyo TX SR-707 | 70" Sharp Aquos LCD | KEF Audio 5.1 C3/C6LCR/C7 Workstation: Intel i7 920 D0 @ 4GHz | ASUS Rampage II Extreme | GTX 480 @ 800Mhz | Koolance VID-NX480 | Lian-Li V1200B | Corsair HX1000 EK NB ASUS HP | Watercool HeatKiller 3.0 | Feser Extreme X-360 | 2x160GB Intel X25-M SSD RAID0 | 4x2TB WD20EARS RAID10 12GB Corsair Dominator @ 8-8-8-24-1T DDR3-1600 | Creative X-Fi Titanium | Pioneer DVR-212D | Gentoo Linux Dell 3008WFP | JohnBlue JB3 | CityPulse DA2.03e II DAC | KingRex T20U w/ Modded Auricaps & PSU | Glow Audio Sub One Server: Quad Socket Opteron 8356 (16 cores) @ 2.3GHz | Supermicro H8QMi-2 | Supermicro 2U Chassis | Redundant 1200W PSU 32GB 2GBx16 DDR2-667 ECC | 4x 300GB Cheetah SAS RAID10 | Adaptec 5805 512MB w/BBU | Colocated | Gentoo Linux |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
First, sorry for being upset. Secondly, I'm sorry, Lonni, for being rude. You're not the target of this message. I always appreciate the help you can provide on this forum and the discussions we had elsewhere. Fell free to send this message to you boss or anyone taking decisions regarding NVidia and Linux. Why being upset ? Simple: Why nvidia doesn't give (or distribute with a special agreement or ...) beta drivers to Linux Community ?. All around we have problems with current drivers: either buggy, or not supporting newest cards etc. Even if development of "release" drivers takes time (being a developer, I can understand it), we (users) can also understand that beta drivers won't work as expected and contain bugs. But what are those bugs beside a limited but functional system (ex: just starting an X server on a 7300. No 3D accel, no fancy stuff. Just having a framebuffer !) ? If I want stability, I can buy "old" cards and use "old" drivers with "old" kernels. But if for any reason, one element in the system requires updated drivers 'let's say audio or network), you get stuck. ------------------------------------ Let me illustrate this: For example,we have the following problem. We have a Gigabyte motherboard with GeForce6150/nforce 430 on it. Nice stuff but : driver 8178 doesn't work well on this card. So we added a GeForce 6200TC to it and disabled builtin 6150. This way, we can use 7174 drivers which work quite well. That's what I call a "stability" choice. Here's where it becomes tricky: - 7174 driver doesn't work with kernel >=2.6.15 (7174 is not maintained for recent kernels and causes kernel stack traces: the 8178 was patched to avoid this, but not 7174....) - audio chip only works with recent alsa versions (>=2.6.15.5) - forcedeth requires also newer sources (>0.49) At the end it becomes really tricky to get something to work. Should we buy "old" motherboards to get it work ? Probably, but we need hundreds of these and they're not manufactured anymore ! (ask ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI ... for a motherboard lifetime) NB: we have the same problems with ALL Geforce6150/nforce 430 motherboards around: we tested Gigabyte, MSI and ASUS. No luck: none better than others => that's not a bios problem, or a manufacturer problem: it's really a problem with nvidia drivers and timeframe for releases. If I add that my company is trying to build a set-top-box prototype which could lead to thousands installed solutions, you can understand that I'm quite nervous on stability problems. It's not just a "gamer" problem who can't get 8000FPS on it's card ! It's a professional solution which works well on 6150 but we can't sell because of stability and bugs of nvidia drivers ! We've tested nearly ALL possible combinations with : - 6 different motherboards (ASUS/MSI/Gigabyte/Foxconn), - 5 different nvidia cards (from 6150 to 6600), - 3 different drivers (7174,7676,8178), - 8 different kernels (from 2.6.13 to 2.6.15.5) during nearly 6 months. Imagine all the stability tests and developpement efforts we had to give just to workaround a driver bug (8178 for GeForce 6150 is buggy: no antialiasing, sync/vblank problems, freezes ...) and finally try to get a stable system. That's not realistic ! And even now, we have something running quite fine, it's just because we have a dual GPU box (6150+6200 with 6150 disabled) ! Finally, I could believe that buggy 8178 drivers are just a good marketing strategy for nvidia: 2 GPUS/box instead of 1 ;-) . But it's not acceptable for us. And again, even if we're happy with this funky hardware we assembled and tested in 5 months, we have more and more troubles to find 6200TC cards which are being quickly replaced by 7300 (not supported anywhere !). Conclusion: as soon as we have a working box, we can't be sure we'll be able to sell it more than 1 or 2 months simply because of GPU disponibility ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If nvidia just gave beta drivers (as for Windows!), I could make all the stuff work with a recent kernel (2.6.15.5 or even 2.6.16-rcX) and no patch-o-patch stuff. This way, I could be sure of our hardware choices. When nvidia would release the driver, we could release our solution (of course, end customer shouldn't have beta drivers in its box). But giving beta drivers would help all developpers around too. At the time of writing, we have prototypes running nvidia chips with 7174 or 8178 drivers. But I can't be sure the hardware is good and stable for our application => if nvidia doesn't do something quickly, we'll have to switch to something else ! Our market is ready and waiting for us. I just hope it will wait until nvidia releases it's new driver... I know there's a developper program which perhaps gives access to beta drivers (I'm even not sure that Linux drivers are available). I registered myself 2 months ago and no answer (not even a confirmation mail !). IS THAT NVIDIA'S CONCEPTION OF CUSTOMER SERVICE ? I'm going to call the French NVidia Office too, even if I already know the silly answer I'll get ("we can't do anything bla bla bla not responsible bla bla bla linux ? what's that ? bla bla beta only for window$ bla bla bla bla...") Finally, I'm just very happy not to have spent precious time in january to try to reproduce 3D problems we have with GF6150: by coding some repro case programs and taking time for it, I'm quite sure I would'nt have received any patch for current driver as a reward (and not even a beta one). So, why pay for something which is not supported in "normal" timeframes ? First motherboards with 6150 came out in september 05. 6 (SIX !) months later, nVidia is not able to provide a working driver for it. That's just taking customers for milk cows (as we say in France ;-)). I wouldn't buy a 7900 now for sure if I can expect having it running well only in 2007... NVidia shouldn't claim a support for Linux in these conditions. And specially, NVidia shouldn't use Linux as a marketing argument. It's not fair. It's just a lie. People must know it.
__________________
[COLOR="Gray"][I]"Learn from other people's mistakes, you don't have time to make your own."[/I][/COLOR] |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 173.14.35 Linux Driver | annb | NVIDIA Legacy Graphics Cards | 0 | 06-13-12 06:46 PM |
| GTX 460M, Xorg 1.12, nvidia driver 295.49, linux 3.3.5-1-ARCH and NVRM Xid 44 | elsifaka | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-14-12 08:48 AM |
| Best Linux driver for Quadro FX2700M | dclement | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-07-12 06:58 AM |
| 302.07 (beta) for Linux x86/x86_64 released | AaronP | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-02-12 09:55 AM |
| download problem with linux NVIDIA driver packages | Timo | NVIDIA Linux | 7 | 07-31-02 09:22 AM |