Go Back   nV News Forums > Linux Support Forums > NVIDIA Linux

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-06, 02:29 PM   #1
russofris
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 125
Default Andrew Fear quote clarification request

Hi there,

I just read an article containing the following quote from Andrew Fear of Nvidia. I was wondering if someone from Nvidia could clarify what was said. The article is located here ( http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/softwa...9352584,00.htm )

The quote is:
Quote:
For Nvidia, intellectual property is a secondary issue. "It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help," said Andrew Fear, Nvidia's software product manager. In addition, customers aren't asking for open-source drivers, he said.

Some Nvidia components are open, including some driver configuration tools and a driver component that interfaces to the kernel. "We believe in open source where it makes sense," Fear said.
My questions are as follows:

1: When Mr Fear referrs to "customers", is he speaking about OEMs, VAR/HARs, or end-users?

2: Has Nvidia looked at cases where companies 'have' open sourced (part of) their graphics driver? Withe the XGI acquisition, has having an OSS 2D driver been a benefit or detriment to Nvidia?

3: From which kernel is the Nvidia 2D driver derived (SysV, BSD, NT, Linux)?

Thank you for your time,
Frank Russo

Side note:
This is not a FOSS debate thread. Posters, please go to slashdot if you wish to debate something.
russofris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.