|
|
#1 | |
|
Power User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 465
|
I can't get this at all. I get only 84,300 points in this benchmark.
No matter what i do thats what i get. I got 3.2 Pentium D 7800GTX SLI 2 gigs ram latest forceware. Even on watercooling everything. I turn off AA AF and Vsyn and it goes up alittle. For a system like mine i should be getting 190,000 point. I have latest chipset drivers x16 nforce 4 intel side. I have 1.5 gigs ram free in windows xp too. Any clue why i would be getting these terrible scores? I do everything by the book even with dual core fix and all patches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Power User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 465
|
No one really has a clue? This news board is dying i see from the little responces lately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 2,371
|
never used aquamark, but you are using a intel chip
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: River City
Posts: 1,726
|
I still use AM3 for stability testing of the graphics card and cpu. This benchmark does favor the cpu. IIRC it takes a overclocked Opteron to get past the 100K barrier or maybe an X2 4800+ with the 7800GTX.
I get 77K with a 3700+ (74K with a P4 3.4E) and no overclocking to a single 7800GTX or cpu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 465
|
how do folks get AQ3 over 1k? I read a guy on here with 2 7800GTX's get 137,000 with it. Is the Pentium D 940 garbage or is it gold for everyday situations?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
SuperMod
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: River City
Posts: 1,726
|
I have not kept up with the benchmark scores as AM3 is no longer supported as far as I know.
137K is significantly higher than what I was aware of. I just remember scores of around 110K. But I have no doubt that has been bettered. Pentiums are good it's just the Latest AMD CPUs are better for gaming. That may or may not change with the Conroes. I personally plan to find out when they become available. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
R.I.P. Babe Thread
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
|
I get in the 84,000 area with my rig.
We are talking about Aquamark3, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 465
|
That not a bad system but i have 2 7800GTX's sli pD3200 and still get only 72,000 with Aquamark 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 79
|
I like a3 more than 3dmark just because the test is so much faster. I hate waiting around for 10 minutes or so for a 3d mark test.. Anway, yeah I can confirm that there is something wrong with your score. I am getting 103,911 with my card at 700 core, and I was getting 96,091 with my core at 555.
Either you have bad cards, or it is that processor. I am being led to believe that it is the processor, because when I upped my gpu core 150mhz I only gained 5k points, but from overclocking my ram and processor I probably went up about 25k. (I was getting 72,000 when I first put together my computer) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AquaMark Error | skipparoo | Benchmarking And Overclocking | 10 | 10-03-02 05:57 PM |
| Is it bad to leave geforce overclocked all the time? | Creole | General Hardware | 2 | 09-23-02 11:13 PM |
| 3dMark2001 scores for 9700 | pelly | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 17 | 08-24-02 02:27 AM |
| so let's try this again in the new forum - bad performance with correctly inst.driver | neutrino | NVIDIA Linux | 11 | 08-01-02 04:19 PM |