Go Back   nV News Forums > Graphics Card Forums > Other Desktop Graphics Cards

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-03, 11:40 PM   #1
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default has anyone know parhelia performance in 3dmark2k3

im interested

see ya

well i manage to look some socores they range between 800 and 900 kinda crappy

i took this from a guy in matrox users...

Quote:
XP 1800@1800
Parhelia A128R not overclocked

812 without FAA
GT1 - Wings of Fury: 60.6 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon: 4.1 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair: 4.6 fps
CPU score: 255 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing): 666.7 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing): 2106.4 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader: 6.0 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0: Not supported
Ragtroll: 1.9 fps

Sound Tests
No sounds: 17.0
24 sounds: 14.2
60 sounds: Not supported

682 with FAA
GT1 - Wings of Fury: 50.8 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon: 3.5 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair: 4.1 fps
CPU score: 254 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing): 676.7 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing): 2147.4 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader: 5.6 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0: Not supported
Ragtroll: 1.7 fps

Sound Tests
No sounds: 17.0
24 sounds: 14.1
60 sounds: Not supported

Unfortunatly there are graphical glitches in test 2 and 3 and test 2 and 3 are slide shows.
kinda crappy....especially the dx81 test they suck big time
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P

Last edited by sebazve; 02-11-03 at 11:47 PM.
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 04:56 AM   #2
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

what the fudge? my system got 800-900 3dmarks in 3dmark03.

a gf3 and a slower CPU get the same score as Parhelia?

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 07:56 AM   #3
Darth Rancid
DeltaChromeF1
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 211
Default

Parhelia is somewhat of an underperformer, proving that a nice memory interface isn't everything
__________________
End of Line
Darth Rancid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 02:26 PM   #4
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by StealthHawk
what the fudge? my system got 800-900 3dmarks in 3dmark03.

a gf3 and a slower CPU get the same score as Parhelia?

have you also notice the crappy fps on the radeon 8500 in game test 2 and 3??
I mean r200 have PS 1.4 to run it but the performance sucks. Maybe the drivers sucks or a bug in 3dmark?
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 04:38 PM   #5
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sebazve
have you also notice the crappy fps on the radeon 8500 in game test 2 and 3??
I mean r200 have PS 1.4 to run it but the performance sucks. Maybe the drivers sucks or a bug in 3dmark?
how crappy is the performance of the r8500? i haven't seen any scores for it yet.

i took a brief look in the Benchmark Forum at the 3dmark03 score thread, and saw a bunch of people getting low 100s. i was surprised my score was so "high."
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 08:33 PM   #6
Smokey
Team Rainbow
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 2,273
Default

What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

__________________
HTPC/Gaming
| Hiper Type R 580W PSU
| Intel Q9550 @ 4GHz | Gigabyte EP45 UD3R |4x 1024MB OCZ Reaper PC9200 DDR2 | Seagate 320GB/ Maxtor 320GB/ Maxtor 500GB HDD|Sapphire HD5850 | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Pro | Harmon Kardon AVR135 reciever | Jamo S718 speakers | 42" Plasma 720p (lounge room)-Samsung P2450H (bedroom)
Smokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 09:55 PM   #7
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by StealthHawk
how crappy is the performance of the r8500? i haven't seen any scores for it yet.

i took a brief look in the Benchmark Forum at the 3dmark03 score thread, and saw a bunch of people getting low 100s. i was surprised my score was so "high."
http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/Other/3dmark03/

right from rage3d own 3dmarks review

you can see the poor number, also take a look at ragtoll test the CPU score higher than 9000/8500.

note: the tests start at page 3...
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 09:59 PM   #8
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Smokey
What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

they said that they have tried to stress the video card and take away as much as possible the influence on the scores by the rest of the system like previous 3dmark...

maybe they manage to do it...
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 02-12-03, 10:05 PM   #9
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default

regarding 8500 and 9000 performance ive been told that cause might be becausethey use cards with 64mb of ram and these test uses a lot more so textures were loaded from main memory hence the huge slowdown on fps....
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-03, 11:48 PM   #10
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sebazve
they said that they have tried to stress the video card and take away as much as possible the influence on the scores by the rest of the system like previous 3dmark...

maybe they manage to do it...
but it's the CPU test portion of the 3dmark03!!!!!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-03, 09:41 AM   #11
sebazve
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by StealthHawk
but it's the CPU test portion of the 3dmark03!!!!!!!!
lol i didnt see that, i should check my eyes...i saw game test instead...oh my bad
__________________
Signatures are a waste of bandwidth!
thanks rwolf!!!!! :-P
sebazve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-03, 04:03 PM   #12
Smokey
Team Rainbow
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 2,273
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Smokey
What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

I need to update my scores, I just ran 3dmark again thinking my score was too low, double checked FSAA+Aniso were off.
Ive now turned in a score of 1022 but what is more interesting is that my cpu has changed slightly, you can see me previous score above.

Now, on my Duron600@900

CPU Test 1: 22.6
CPU Test 2: 4.4

Not really that much difference between an OC Duron600@900 vs an AthlonXP1800+ @1800

Thats not what my games tell me
__________________
HTPC/Gaming
| Hiper Type R 580W PSU
| Intel Q9550 @ 4GHz | Gigabyte EP45 UD3R |4x 1024MB OCZ Reaper PC9200 DDR2 | Seagate 320GB/ Maxtor 320GB/ Maxtor 500GB HDD|Sapphire HD5850 | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Pro | Harmon Kardon AVR135 reciever | Jamo S718 speakers | 42" Plasma 720p (lounge room)-Samsung P2450H (bedroom)
Smokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disk Performance Expectations vs. Reality News Archived News Items 0 05-27-12 03:00 PM
SGI Boosts Big Data Performance with Sandy Bridge News Archived News Items 0 05-15-12 08:10 AM
Boost Your Performance Goals 10x ' This Week on inside* Publications News Archived News Items 0 05-13-12 05:20 PM
NVIDIA Unleashes the GeForce GTX 670 Graphics Card ' Performance Perfected (WCCFTECH) News GeForce GTX 670 Reviews 0 05-10-12 08:40 AM
My UT2003 Tweak Guide DXnfiniteFX Gaming Central 48 10-30-02 11:59 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.