The wait is over!

[Sazar]

Originally Posted by DarthBeavis

I believe in SLI the cards try to push out the maximum FPS regardless of if you are using 3d stereo. 3d Stereo is 60 FPS for each eye which is why monitors must accept a native input of 120 hz.

I can't speak to what cards can and cannot be used for PhysX as that is not something I have really dealt with.

Do games have to be specially coded for 3-D or will they work by default just with Nvidia drivers and glasses and stuff?

[Rummy]

I like my eggs over easy thanks

[Heinz68]

Originally Posted by DarthBeavis

Intel failed with Larrabee otherwise we might know. They put in a ton of effort and money (they even had a company design a waterblock for their failed project).
As I said I do not know the technical reason PhysX works or does not work in particular situations I can only recount what I have been told.

As I said they don't even need any killer Larrabee (by the way they still work on the project). Half decent Graphic Card would do the trick.

The difference is if Intel did try that there would be few lawsuits, and even NVIDIA and people like you would be screaming bloody murder.

[Sazar]

Originally Posted by DarthBeavis

Nvidia's 3dVision Software/3DTVPlay software in conjunction with the graphics card and drivers renders over 425 current 2d games in 3d. Each game has a custom profile created by Nvidia optimized for the game. Call of Duty series, L4D series, Modern Warfare 2, etc.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D_Vision_3D_Games.html

Thanks

[Sazar]

Originally Posted by DarthBeavis

Intel failed with Larrabee otherwise we might know. They put in a ton of effort and money (they even had a company design a waterblock for their failed project).

As I said I do not know the technical reason PhysX works or does not work in particular situations I can only recount what I have been told.

It just seems weird that 3'rd party drivers allow for PhysX cards to work perfectly fine, whereas Nvidia's official drivers won't.

That's the big issue.

[ragejg]

Originally Posted by Heinz68

As I said they don't even need any killer Larrabee (by the way they still work on the project). Half decent Graphic Card would do the trick.

The difference is if Intel did try that there would be few lawsuits, and even NVIDIA and people like you would be screaming bloody murder.

Cool it.

[gulizard]

I wont be posting here till this site cleans up this BS. This is nvnews not fanboy ati queer news. I am sick of ATI fan boys. I hate ATI because I did not like their drivers or user interface. I am a fan of one product that has done well for me. I am not some idiot that sees the new corvette is a few MPH faster then the Mustang and runs out and buys it because at the end of the day I still know where reliability is going to be strongest. In this case nvidia is great. The mere fact these cards are capable of running at 95C without issue is amazing to me. People will have to adapt to the fact that the faster these cards get the hotter they will run. This is not a fail by nvidia.

I came to this thread to see that the card was released, not hear some ATI fan boys. I'll be back in a few month when this **** is over. All these same guys were nvidia fans when nvidia was on top, now that the ATI card runs a tad bit cooler, and is afew FPS faster nvidia is the scum of the Earth.

[ragejg]

All right. That's enough.