Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation

[BANDIT] · 11-04-07, 12:02 PM

http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...1&limitstart=1

ASUSEN7900GTX · 11-04-07, 12:38 PM

well i tried to change the exe and i think i might have gotten a bit smoother game play not sure though

aceflier · 11-04-07, 01:10 PM

I noticed this bug also but this workaround may fix the jittery mountains but what other nv optim. will it disable also? 7% decrease in performance to fix a bug is not good in crysis.

This could also be purposely done to increase performance on nvidia side. Either way bad news for us all.

nutcrackr · 11-04-07, 04:17 PM

7% is quite a handy jump, too bad the image quality sucks

nopp0x00 · 11-05-07, 03:28 AM

Meh, the ATI cards still perform worse than Nvidia cards and the newer WHQL drivers aren't out yet.

Kinda funny how ATI has to point one little thing as if makes and breaks the comparisons. They still rate worse than the GT, GTX and Ultra in [H]'s realworld tests in Crysis. ATI will still be getting its ass kicked even after this bug is fixed. And we haven't even seen the new high-end part from NVIDIA, yet.

Keep grasping at straws, ATI. You ****ed up and you have no one else but yourself to blame.

11-04-07, 12:02 PM	#1
[BANDIT] Registered User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 151	Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...1&limitstart=1

11-04-07, 12:38 PM	#2
ASUSEN7900GTX Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,646	Re: Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation well i tried to change the exe and i think i might have gotten a bit smoother game play not sure though __________________ Intel I7 920 gigabyte HD6970 2gb 6GB DDR3 Asus P6t deluxe V2 "be to others as you want others to be against you" some wiseass came up with it

11-04-07, 01:10 PM	#3
aceflier Bringer of teh Welt Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 197	Re: Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation I noticed this bug also but this workaround may fix the jittery mountains but what other nv optim. will it disable also? 7% decrease in performance to fix a bug is not good in crysis. This could also be purposely done to increase performance on nvidia side. Either way bad news for us all. __________________ 2600K 4.9ghz 1.38v 2X Palit gtx560ti 2gb 1000/2000 8gb 1600mhz Kingston HyperX 128gb Crusial Real SSD 750gb WD Black Buggy wife RMA next week Vantage P43697 3DMarks 3D Mark 11 P10008

11-04-07, 04:17 PM	#4
nutcrackr Super Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 3,204	Re: Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation 7% is quite a handy jump, too bad the image quality sucks

11-05-07, 03:28 AM	#5
nopp0x00 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 278	Re: Demo performance and image quality - 169.04 investigation Meh, the ATI cards still perform worse than Nvidia cards and the newer WHQL drivers aren't out yet. Kinda funny how ATI has to point one little thing as if makes and breaks the comparisons. They still rate worse than the GT, GTX and Ultra in [H]'s realworld tests in Crysis. ATI will still be getting its ass kicked even after this bug is fixed. And we haven't even seen the new high-end part from NVIDIA, yet. Keep grasping at straws, ATI. You ****ed up and you have no one else but yourself to blame.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
My UT2003 Tweak Guide	DXnfiniteFX	Gaming Central	48	10-30-02 11:59 PM