has anyone know parhelia performance in 3dmark2k3

[sebazve]

im interested

see ya

well i manage to look some socores they range between 800 and 900 kinda crappy

i took this from a guy in matrox users...

XP 1800@1800
Parhelia A128R not overclocked

812 without FAA
GT1 - Wings of Fury: 60.6 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon: 4.1 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair: 4.6 fps
CPU score: 255 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing): 666.7 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing): 2106.4 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader: 6.0 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0: Not supported
Ragtroll: 1.9 fps

Sound Tests
No sounds: 17.0
24 sounds: 14.2
60 sounds: Not supported

682 with FAA
GT1 - Wings of Fury: 50.8 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon: 3.5 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair: 4.1 fps
CPU score: 254 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing): 676.7 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing): 2147.4 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader: 5.6 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0: Not supported
Ragtroll: 1.7 fps

Sound Tests
No sounds: 17.0
24 sounds: 14.1
60 sounds: Not supported

Unfortunatly there are graphical glitches in test 2 and 3 and test 2 and 3 are slide shows.

kinda crappy....especially the dx81 test they suck big time

what the fudge? my system got 800-900 3dmarks in 3dmark03.

a gf3 and a slower CPU get the same score as Parhelia?

[Darth Rancid]

Parhelia is somewhat of an underperformer, proving that a nice memory interface isn't everything

[sebazve]

Originally posted by StealthHawk
what the fudge? my system got 800-900 3dmarks in 3dmark03.

a gf3 and a slower CPU get the same score as Parhelia?

have you also notice the crappy fps on the radeon 8500 in game test 2 and 3??
I mean r200 have PS 1.4 to run it but the performance sucks. Maybe the drivers sucks or a bug in 3dmark?

Originally posted by sebazve
have you also notice the crappy fps on the radeon 8500 in game test 2 and 3??
I mean r200 have PS 1.4 to run it but the performance sucks. Maybe the drivers sucks or a bug in 3dmark?

how crappy is the performance of the r8500? i haven't seen any scores for it yet.

i took a brief look in the Benchmark Forum at the 3dmark03 score thread, and saw a bunch of people getting low 100s. i was surprised my score was so "high."

[Smokey]

What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

[sebazve]

Originally posted by StealthHawk
how crappy is the performance of the r8500? i haven't seen any scores for it yet.

i took a brief look in the Benchmark Forum at the 3dmark03 score thread, and saw a bunch of people getting low 100s. i was surprised my score was so "high."

http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/Other/3dmark03/

right from rage3d own 3dmarks review

you can see the poor number, also take a look at ragtoll test the CPU score higher than 9000/8500.

note: the tests start at page 3...

[sebazve]

Originally posted by Smokey
What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

they said that they have tried to stress the video card and take away as much as possible the influence on the scores by the rest of the system like previous 3dmark...

maybe they manage to do it...

[sebazve]

regarding 8500 and 9000 performance ive been told that cause might be becausethey use cards with 64mb of ram and these test uses a lot more so textures were loaded from main memory hence the huge slowdown on fps....

Originally posted by sebazve
they said that they have tried to stress the video card and take away as much as possible the influence on the scores by the rest of the system like previous 3dmark...

maybe they manage to do it...

but it's the CPU test portion of the 3dmark03!!!!!!!!

[sebazve]

Originally posted by StealthHawk
but it's the CPU test portion of the 3dmark03!!!!!!!!

lol i didnt see that, i should check my eyes...i saw game test instead...oh my bad

[Smokey]

Originally posted by Smokey
What I find interesting are the cpu scores. Thats with an AthlonXP 1800+ @1800;
CPU Test 1: 28.3 fps
CPU Test 2: 4.5 fps
vs my crappy Duron600 OC to 900
CPU Test 1: 22.0 fps
CPU Test 2: 2.8 fps

I need to update my scores, I just ran 3dmark again thinking my score was too low, double checked FSAA+Aniso were off.
Ive now turned in a score of 1022 but what is more interesting is that my cpu has changed slightly, you can see me previous score above.

Now, on my Duron600@900

CPU Test 1: 22.6
CPU Test 2: 4.4

Not really that much difference between an OC Duron600@900 vs an AthlonXP1800+ @1800

Thats not what my games tell me