|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
These benchies are confusing me...
Please don't go flaming now, I love what this card can do, but something's up... http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1683&p=9 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1683&p=9 The 9700 only beats the GF4 in Comanche4 by 3fps @ 1600! And JK2 by 15fps @ 1600... the GF4 beat the 9700 on both @ 1024 as well... Did I miss something?
__________________
Shalom! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Treehugger
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 942
|
I'm not sure of the explanation, but I do know that the gap widens considerably when AA and Aniso are used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
its because the benchmark is CPU limited.
look here: http://www.gamersdepot.com/hardware/...700pro/005.htm |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes, Jedi Knight is very CPU dependant..Commanche is as well, although nvidia cards always seem to win in it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
.:. Lafiel .:.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
|
Quote:
Notice how performance does not change at all on Radeon 9700 its CPU or Driver limited JK2 http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/r300/page21.asp Shees you missed Stelar AA performance http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/r300/page25.asp Or Aniso and AA enabled http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/r300/page28.asp Better yet Check this out best showoff http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/...00pro(6).shtml Now how can anyone say GF4 is better lol ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Henry stauf
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC
Posts: 88
|
Ill just wait until something makes more than 100 fps with codecreature mark.
MMM... Yeah. Final answer!
__________________
Toshiba M40 - PM1.8Ghz Centrino set / 2GB RAM - DDR1 (pirate) / 80GB Toshiba 2.5" HDD / GF go 6600 128MB PCI-E x16 / Intel 915 / Toshiba DVD+-RW / SB Audigy 2 NX / Samaung SM715v Toshiba PPC e830 - 2x 1GB SD / 2.2GB Magicstor CF2 MHDD / BT / WiFi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
.:. Lafiel .:.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
|
Some people complain about Commanche 4 Performance
http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/...00pro(7).shtml ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
QuadCore G80 PS3 Overload
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a small room surrounded by vast, inscrutable, machines...
Posts: 491
|
Although the the R300 is insanely fast, as the GF4 when it was released, I'd find it hard to justify spending almost twice as much on a new card for less than twice the performance gain.
Since nothing is going to make use of the newer features of the card, at least until DX9 is released, it just seems to make sense to wait. I get all the eye candy I need in the few games I play (NWN, DS etc). I think January will be good time to look at upgrading. There will be quite a few more options then, Trident, nVidia, and ATi, and DX9 will have been released. Then we'll have some nice demos and maybe someone will finally get to review the other features of the cards that are also interesting such as DVD playback quality and offline 3D modelling.
__________________
Folding for Beyond3D "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." Sir Winston Churchill "Halflife2 got halfway around the world before Gabe had a chance to get his pants on." Anon |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
FanATIc/Nvidiot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
look at the pics at the bottom on this page and ull see that 4x removes most of the visible "jaggies" (hehe nice word) so the difference between 4x and 6x is little as most of the edges r quite smooth. Hothardware even said that 6x FSAA is better than Matroxs 16x FAA so i think it must be real good. with the r400 and nv30 ill think we could see 8x FSAA be used and still be playable ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Radeforce GTX7970
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,346
|
Quote:
Results with radeon 9700 4x fsaa&16xaniso-gf4 4xfsaa& only 4xaniso. UT2003 1024x768 antalus Radeon=66-Gf4=30.Well I guess 100% is just slow.Lets move on. UT2003 1600x1200 antalus Radeon=31-Gf4=11.Hmm 200% faster?No no no that's still a bit slow. Jedi Knight 2 1280x1024 Radeon=139-Gf4=50.About 165% faster. Jedi Knight 2 1600x1200 Radeon=101-Gf4=21.It's about 400% faster,not even 1000%,well lets hope for better drives!! The nice part is that anand didn't use same setting aniso for Gf4 for the simple reason that it would get A VERY LARGE ZERO!!! No need to flame the results speak for themselves. The number you have posted are of cpu limited games.The -1 or 3 fps will be corrected in a future driver release. Please don't compare the Radeon 9700 with the Gf4 it's ridiculous and you know it!! I'm waiting to see what nv30 brings to the table. Last edited by Fotis; 08-20-02 at 09:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti GPU is Out Now, Great for 720p S3D | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 10-09-12 09:40 AM |
| Now Available - Avernum: The Great Trials Trilogy, 20% off! | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 05-12-12 12:00 PM |
| Former Nvidia user: 9700 impressions | nin_fragile14 | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 58 | 11-01-02 01:38 PM |
| Radeon 9700 not all that? | sancheuz | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 200 | 10-12-02 09:31 PM |
| FalconNW and Voodoo under ATI 9700 spell!!! | mizzer | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 12 | 09-20-02 07:53 PM |