Crysis Feedback Thread

[mythy]

Originally Posted by breathemetal

I cant wait to get my hands on this. So many good games atm.

Crysis GREAT!!!
The Witcher ok...
Call of Duty 4 GREAT!!!
Timeshift SUCKS!!!
Empire Earth 3 SUCKS!!!
Medal of Honor Airborne OLD x2!!!
Gears of War GREAT!!!
Stalker OLD!!!

man...i have a lot to play through

meh fixed it

[Jonelo]

I dont says that COD 4 look better, only without AF, and COD with AF , look better in the part of the textures , and well maybe in general. Or not worse .

The AF is posible, but with artifacts or without paralax mapping . But with AF in Crysis , not is posible the comparative , Crysis is better in all features , today the Imagen quality /perfomance ratio is very bad for Crysis , but in the future...

[nutcrackr]

Originally Posted by conroejoe

Im with ya. COD4 looks soooo much better. I'm uber disappointed with the crap-ass performance that was seen in the demo... it's not any better with retail. I lost interest after the betas. I'm sure the fanboys like Nekrosoft and Jakup will be in soon to post about what a phenomenal game it is, blah blah. The fact of the matter is that this is supposed to be the game of games and its not. Its all hype.

Are you sad because you can't run it on max?

Crysis looks better on high/custom settings than COD 4 does at max, and I can't see how anybody would say otherwise unless they hate tropical settings or prefer low res/low polygon settings with maps the size of a matchbox.

You probably just want to play it on max settings, and can't so you say it sucks.

[conroejoe]

Originally Posted by nutcrackr

Are you sad because you can't run it on max?

Crysis looks better on high/custom settings than COD 4 does at max, and I can't see how anybody would say otherwise unless they hate tropical settings or prefer low res/low polygon settings with maps the size of a matchbox.

You probably just want to play it on max settings, and can't so you say it sucks.

Im sad cause it runs like crap on high without AA on.

[SH0DAN]

Todays hardware cannot cope,simple.A year,to a year and a half from now,we will have hardware that will cope well.This is nothing new.

I think GB's messages on Shack last night are right on the money.

[m3dude]

u think






looks better than






? .....lol

[LORD-eX-Bu]

for the most part yes. Those COD 4 pics look great, very atmostpheric. Crysis looks pretty bland, still going to be a great game tho

[conroejoe]

Here is another reason to be sad... ****ing liars. Quad core my ass...sitting there doing nothing.

[m3dude]

Originally Posted by LORD-eX-Bu

for the most part yes. Those COD 4 pics look great, very atmostpheric. Crysis looks pretty bland, still going to be a great game tho

LOL OK

[mythy]

Hey crysis uses all of my 4 cores but there thread aka physics! so unless you were blowing up buildings and **** it wont show up

[Steamer2499]

COD 4 graphics suck in comparison to Crysis. COD4 is a great game. But Crysis is the best looking game ever.

[Jonelo]

Well, I replay the first level , very high /shadows in medium- but 2046 resolution - , AA 4 , only 720p 18-25 fps .. looks like COD 6 . Is other generation . Maybe the right comparation is Crysis mediun versus COD 4

In some maps of multiplayer , without vegetation , maybe Crysis is dissapointing with the AF 0 . But in singleplayer , with vegetation , the other features and the vegetation hid the AF lack . In a few years we will laugh at these comparisons