Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-25-07, 01:53 AM   #49
Bokishi
NV THIS
 
Bokishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hutt Space
Posts: 1,289
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

Those pics are sooo fake
__________________
i5 2500K @ 4.2GHz
EVGA Z68
Ripjaws X 16GB 1600MHz
EVGA GTX 680
X-Fi Titanium HD
Intel 40GB SSD (SRT Cache)
Hitachi 1TB Boot HDD
7TB Storage HDDs
Coolermaster 750w
Bokishi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 02:33 AM   #50
JigenD
Registered User
 
JigenD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

3ds max, Digital Fusion, Photoshop, VRay

Hey, they can still do this. 3D Mark 08 will simply cost $10k, and each frame will take 2 weeks to render!
JigenD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 03:12 AM   #51
Focca
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

might as well take a picture of my ass and say its the new 3dmark
__________________
Vaio FZ31s Spec:
15.4 inch double Lamp Screen
Core 2 Duo 2.1ghz
8600m GS oced to 690/790
4gb Ram
Bluray Drive
250gb Hard Dirve
Windows 7
181.20 Drivers
Xbox 360 Wireless Controller.
Focca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 03:23 AM   #52
Buio
Registered User
 
Buio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richteralan
confirmed the 1st one is Photochopped.
This is the source of 1st pic: http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthre...f=121&t=353291
Others are extremely possible photochopped
So 19 hours/frame, thats 0,000015 fps.

And btw, funny how people later in thread still asking about it being fake, when you proved it already on first page.
Buio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 03:46 AM   #53
Jonelo
Registered User
 
Jonelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,204
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

http://r800.blogspot.com/

This looks better, the Porn Mark 2008


















Guauuu this looks better than Crysis - and Uncharted and Killzone 2 - !!!

http://r800.blogspot.com/


Quote:
nApoleon from The hardware website CHIPHELL has done a brief 3DMARK Vantage test. The test uses Build 23 version and Radeon HD 3850 512MB Crossfire. From pictures below, we can see that 3 DMARK Vantage Build 23 full installations require 665.25 MB disk space. Now 3 DMARK Vantage Build 23 includes Game Test1 Test, the name is Jane Nash, Game Test 2, the name is New Calico, and CPU Test1, the name is AI, and CPU Test2, the name is Physics, these two test CPU’s AI and physics acceleration performance.

From the fps and the quality shown in the pictures , we can say 3 DMARK Vantage is still in the beta stage, screen quality is not perfect, the picture is rather vague, at the same time, under the 1280 x1024 resolution, Radeon HD 3850 512MB Crossfire didn’t run very well.

Heard from other testers, that GeForce 8800GTX cannot run Game Test 2, compared with the fact that Radeon HD 3850 512MB Crossfire can run Game Test 2, it suggests that Game Test 2 -New Calico tests the DX10.1 capability of graphics cards. What a pitty for NVIDIA, when 3 DMARK Vantage comes out at next February, NVIDIA can only get GeForce 9600 GT out for 3 DMARK Vantage if D9E cannot support DX10.1.
Jonelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 03:59 AM   #54
msxyz
Hybrid Microprocessor
 
msxyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Milan (Italy)
Posts: 2,050
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

Looks like crap to me. 3DMark really went downhill starting from relase 2003. When there are better looking games around which require less powerful hardware, it's a sign that your benchmark is no longer rapresentative of the current state of the software/hardware.

Futuremark may claim that thy use a more sophisticate approach to lighting and surface details but to be really rapresentative of the market they should just use the same tricks and shortcuts of games, otherwise it's just a nice slideshow (and sometimes, not even nice).
__________________
Powered by:
Pentium Dual E2180 (2GHz, 200MHz FSB)
Abit L95C (The one and only mATX with dual PCIe slots!) + 2x1 Geil Black Dragon PC6400
XFX 9600GSO 384MB
Little freak wonder
msxyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 04:10 AM   #55
Jonelo
Registered User
 
Jonelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,204
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

Maybe is fake
Jonelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 05:37 AM   #56
XxDeadlyxX
STALKER!!!!!!!!
 
XxDeadlyxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,455
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

What the heck... that looks like utter sh!te...
__________________
Main PC [Core i7 980X @ 4.3GHz] [Gigabyte X58A-UD7] [7TB of HDDs] [2x Inno3D GTX 480 SLI @ stock] [12GB Team Xtreem 7-7-7-24 @ 1500mhz] [Antec 1200] [Alienware AW2310 (general use/3D Vision) and Samsung 46B650 @ 1080p24] [X-Fi Forte] [Pioneer Blu-ray BDC-S02] [Silverstone Strider 1500W] [Creative Gigaworks S750 7.1] [Windows 7 x64] 3DMark Vantage - 38010
XxDeadlyxX is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 12-25-07, 05:56 AM   #57
Zeus666
Registered User
 
Zeus666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 382
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt_Ram
are all those screen shots faked, or just some?
the news itself is a fake, Futeremark never sent that newsletter.
Someone in a previous post have put a link to real statement.

Edit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrixteH
Zeus666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 05:58 AM   #58
nutcrackr
Super Registered User
 
nutcrackr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,204
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

looks worse than 3dmark03
nutcrackr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 01:09 PM   #59
jeffmd
Has a vegetation fetish
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,816
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

I never thought of 3dmark as a visualy appealing series actually. The humanoid models were often ugly looking and had bad animation to boot. The nature demo sections were the only good looking part of the series.
__________________
_________________________________________________
Mobo: EVGA 122-ck-nf68 680i sli, CPU: C2D Quad 6600, Video: EVGA GTX 460 1gb SC, Sound: X-fi gaming, Windows 7, Antec P180b,Thermalright Ultra-120 HSF, Antec TruPower TP3-650, 4 Gigs RAM
jeffmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-07, 01:37 PM   #60
mythy
Single Male
 
mythy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: 3D MARK 2008 screens

there fakes
__________________

---Q6600 @3.45 430FSB - P5K Deluxe---
---1066 5-4-4-12 PL6! - 257 GTX OCed---
---ASUS Xonar DX - Dell 2407 24 LCD---
mythy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(Joystiq) Epic's Mark Rein on UE4, Epic Baltimore and Gears of War: Judgment News Archived News Items 0 06-11-12 01:50 PM
(Gamers Hell) Assassin's Creed III New E3 2012 Screens News Archived News Items 0 06-11-12 05:30 AM
no screens found + BusID ?? orion NVIDIA Linux 2 08-24-02 08:34 AM
Worked fine before, now getting "no screens found" HansBoldt NVIDIA Linux 3 08-22-02 06:20 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.