Ultra high-definition TV

[XDanger]

[NaitoSan]

Originally Posted by XDanger

hahahahahahaha i'll take two of super huge bigman o vision.

[Madpistol]

Originally Posted by XDanger

16,000 x 9,000 pixels.

[ViN86]

Originally Posted by Toss3

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080114...chnologysector

I say what's the point, unless they're developing 100inch+ displays as well?

seriously LOL.

i mean what the hell is the point with the current size of TV's.

[jcrox]

Originally Posted by ViN86

seriously LOL.

i mean what the hell is the point with the current size of TV's.

I would imagine they'll incorporate it into things like the displays at sports arenas, displays at convention centers.... stuff like that.

[amk21]

Originally Posted by jcrox

I would imagine they'll incorporate it into things like the displays at sports arenas, displays at convention centers.... stuff like that.

Ya I don't think that tis is meant for mass market consumer resale.

[ViN86]

Originally Posted by jcrox

I would imagine they'll incorporate it into things like the displays at sports arenas, displays at convention centers.... stuff like that.

ahhh, that makes more sense.

[XDanger]

Put one on the moon, FREE TV FOR EVERYONE!!!!

Originally Posted by nekrosoft13

they will have to sell movies on 2tb HDDs then

[Zelda_fan]

Originally Posted by Peoples-Agent

Won't be much point in the home, but just imagine the clarity you could have at the cinema. Final nail in the projector's coffin.

Digital will never replace film and that has nothing to do with resolution. It has to do with the way film handles lighting. Digital will never look like film. Anyone who's ever picked up a film camera knows this.