Go Back   nV News Forums > Graphics Card Forums > NVIDIA Legacy Graphics Cards

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-26-03, 01:26 AM   #13
VoodooNinja
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
A Review about this crap card...
That statement is uncalled for and lame.
__________________
------------ WATER COOLED--------------
Intel Core2Duo 6420
MSI P6N SLI-FI
2GB OCZ Reaper HPC
EVGA 8800GTS 640MB
74GB WD Raptor
300GB Seagate Barracuda
Creative Audigy 2
Asus 52X CDROM
LiteOn DVD R/RW
Samsung 226BW
Win XP
VoodooNinja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 02:29 AM   #14
marcocom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sphinx
http://www.ukgamer.com/article.php4?id=236&page=1


A Review about this crap card...
over 6000 in 3dmark.. that doesnt sound crappy. wow you must have one seriously fast setup i guess...
marcocom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 02:36 AM   #15
bkswaney
Mr. Extreme!
 
bkswaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 3,421
Send a message via Yahoo to bkswaney
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by VoodooNinja
That statement is uncalled for and lame.
I must agree.

So it's not as fast as a 9800. So what. It's still a very nice and fast
card.
Plus I like something that everyone and his brother does not have.
Well, it's a Ultra.
__________________
Notebook!
Compaq Presario CQ60-215DX
AMD 64 Athlon X2 @ 2GHz (QL62)
15.6 inch HD WideScreen
Nvidia 8200M-G 895mb
2Gig system ram
250Gig SATA 5400rpm HDrive
Vista Premium
bkswaney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 03:32 AM   #16
dude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sphinx
http://www.ukgamer.com/article.php4?id=236&page=1


A Review about this crap card...
To tell you the truth i thought so as well when i bough it but since then the card is only getting better with the release of the new drivers.I tell you it flies and before this i tried a 9700 pro and i tell you there were some games where the game would just send me back to the desktop because of the card compatilability,but not with FX Ultra doesn't matter what i throw at it it plays everything.I must admit that the AA is not the best but with 1600x1200 resolution even without the AA everything looks so crisp,plus with the speed of the core and memory it is only a matter of time before some drivers are made specially for this line of cards,heres hoping that the 50xxxx detonators will be.So all i say to those people that keep bagging this card is ,i have one and i'm very happy with it so if you don't like it don't buy it.Thanks thats my 2bob worth.
dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 09:58 AM   #17
Sphinx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 32
Send a message via ICQ to Sphinx
Default

I for my own personally bought a HERCULES 9800 Pro. A nice Card and fast however like my previous Card the HIS 9700Pro no Problems.

I have read so many Reviews abaout the ASUS 5800Ultra Card ~ (i prefer normally ASUS Cards,Motherboards)
But the Reviews speak for himself (all).
__________________
Powered by /\
Sphinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 03:42 PM   #18
gokickrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 409
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bkswaney
I must agree.

So it's not as fast as a 9800. So what. It's still a very nice and fast
card.
Plus I like something that everyone and his brother does not have.
Well, it's a Ultra.
should have gotten a voodoo 5 6000

i had a chance of getting a working sample, but the price on those are just ridiculous...
__________________
"never argue with an idiot, they will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience"
gokickrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 05:21 PM   #19
creedamd
 
creedamd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 597
Default

"Sadly for Asus the V9900 Ultra massively underperforms. The NV30 has been a complete mess for NVIDIA and one wonders why it's being rolled out with performance that is clearly substandard when anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering are enabled. When we looked at the MSI Geforce FX 5800 Ultra, we saw a card that is quite capable when FSAA and AF are disabled, and with the V9900 Ultra it is the same story, as shown by the Unreal Tournament 2003 results." from ukgamer

who in the hell would want a $400 card that you have to disable aa and af??
__________________
System 1: 2500xp@3200|1gigHyperXPC4000|AbNF7s|Fortissimo7.1|SonyDJV700|DvdR+&CDRW|160gbHD
|9800pro|21"IBM-P260

System2: 2500xp@3200|abitNF7-s|512XMS|9700pro|160Gbhd

System3: 2400xp|512xms|Epox 8rda+|9500pro
creedamd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 06:25 PM   #20
jAkUp
eat. sleep. overclock.
 
jAkUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by creedamd
who in the hell would want a $400 card that you have to disable aa and af??
doom3 and future games.. will we be playing doom3 with aa and af? i doubt that. plus the geforcefx ultra is faster than the radeon cards with high resolution with little or no aa.
__________________
965xe || evga x58 classified || 3x evga gtx 480 || 6gb g.skill || win7 x64
jAkUp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-26-03, 07:03 PM   #21
dude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 15
Default

Once Half Life 2 and Doom 3 comes out and i play them i will let you know how the card does ,by this time new drivers should be out too so we will wait and see.But i'll tell you this everybody have their own taste ,i tried the Ati cards 9700pro and i did not like them to me the picture where not as crisp as the Nvidia cards .
dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 07:42 PM   #22
MikeC
Administrator
 
MikeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,460
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by creedamd
who in the hell would want a $400 card that you have to disable aa and af??
I've been using a GeForce FX 5600 Ultra and 5200 Ultra and haven't found it necessary to disable those features.
MikeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 10:42 PM   #23
MikeC
Administrator
 
MikeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,460
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CoWBoY
Playing games at 800x600 or 640x480 doesn't count Mike...
There are a number of games that are playable at 1024x768 with 2X AA and 8X Aniso on the 5600 Ultra. They include RTCW, Warcraft 3, Dungeon Siege, Raven Shield, and IL2-Sturmovik.
MikeC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-03, 11:25 PM   #24
skoprowski
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Canton, OH USA
Posts: 495
Default

Unfortunately that doesn't include any UT2003 based engine games. My BFG 5600 256meg just choked in the Unreal based games at 1024 x 768 with any AA or Anis setting with a Barton 2500.
skoprowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nvidia GeForce 301.42 WHQL drivers DSC NVIDIA Windows Graphics Drivers 5 05-29-12 11:12 PM
New GPU from Nvidia Announced Today, the GeForce GTX 670 News Archived News Items 0 05-10-12 02:50 PM
Gainward Unleashes the Sexy GeForce GTX 670 Phantom Graphics Card, Also launches the News Archived News Items 0 05-10-12 10:28 AM
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU II Top Unveiled Features 1137MHz Boost Clock (WCCFTECH) News GeForce GTX 670 Reviews 0 05-10-12 07:30 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.