|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
|
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/f...20LinuxQA.mspx
And more to come: http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=218501447 Three things make this announcement huge: 1. Microsoft 2. GPLv2 License 3. Drivers I hope to see some more software giants (*hint hint*) to do the same thing. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 711
|
How is this related? (not at all)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
|
I'm asking the developers if they will too open the source of the graphics driver.
(It's an nvidia support forum, isn't it?) Perhaps you're right, maybe it should be transferred to "General Linux" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 226
|
All M$ released was code to make Linux run faster being virtualized on Windows. Why in the world would anyone want to do that? Why not just run Linux natively on the hardware?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 711
|
They won't in the foreseeable future, also I doubt that the people how read this forums even have the power to decide that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Relativity
Posts: 194
|
How Microsoft made open source selfish
http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20...ource-selfish/
__________________
Elephants can fly but they have no reason to. ------------------------------------------ Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.5Ghz | Asus M4A785-M | 2 Gig Crucial DDR2 @ 960 Mhz | GeForce GT 440 1024 MB | Linux 3.6.1 / Ubuntu 12.04 / W.I.N.E v1.5.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Linux runs particularly well as a virtual machine, and Microsoft is trying to push some of their own virtualization products. Thus the release of Linux drivers to improve the performance of a Linux VM running on a Microsoft hypervisor. Microsoft didn't really make any noteworthy open source moves here. They needed to release drivers for Linux, and the only way to get them in the kernel tree is to give them a compatible license (GPL). So that leads me back to the original argument, if Microsoft can release GPL drivers without a binary blob, why can't NVidia? I'm willing to bet that locked in Nvidia's binary blob is some intellectual property that they do not have exclusive rights to give up, even if they wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5
|
Microsoft's open-source drivers won't do a thing without their Windows operating system. In a way, Windows is their 'binary blob'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Relativity
Posts: 194
|
"Microsoft opened its source"
Fat Chance.
__________________
Elephants can fly but they have no reason to. ------------------------------------------ Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.5Ghz | Asus M4A785-M | 2 Gig Crucial DDR2 @ 960 Mhz | GeForce GT 440 1024 MB | Linux 3.6.1 / Ubuntu 12.04 / W.I.N.E v1.5.14 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|