MX440 or MX440 SE ?

upas · 05-01-03, 09:22 PM

info:
1.0-4349
MX440SE
Redhat 8.0
AthlonXP2400+
nforce2

the driver always detect my card as MX440
and can't start X.

bwkaz · 05-01-03, 09:35 PM

Post your /var/log/XFree86.0.log file from a failed X attempt.

upas · 05-01-03, 09:42 PM

thanks!

bwkaz · 05-02-03, 08:14 AM

Well... hmm.

It's not what I thought it was, I can say that much. Unfortunately, that doesn't help you at all.

You've got an nForce2 chipset... Are you using Option "NvAGP" "1" in your config file Device section? It doesn't look like it from the log, and you can't use agpgart (the default) with an nForce chipset. Yeah, I just looked at the config file again -- you need to add that Option line to it.

Edit: You might want to go with driver 1.0-4363 instead of 1.0-4349, too -- 4363 has a bunch of bugfixes (issues people were having with 4349) in it.

05-01-03, 09:35 PM	#2
bwkaz Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 2,262	Post your /var/log/XFree86.0.log file from a failed X attempt. __________________ Registered Linux User #219692

05-02-03, 08:14 AM	#4
bwkaz Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 2,262	Well... hmm. It's not what I thought it was, I can say that much. Unfortunately, that doesn't help you at all. You've got an nForce2 chipset... Are you using Option "NvAGP" "1" in your config file Device section? It doesn't look like it from the log, and you can't use agpgart (the default) with an nForce chipset. Yeah, I just looked at the config file again -- you need to add that Option line to it. Edit: You might want to go with driver 1.0-4363 instead of 1.0-4349, too -- 4363 has a bunch of bugfixes (issues people were having with 4349) in it. __________________ Registered Linux User #219692

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
GeForce4 MX440	igel4u	NVIDIA Linux	2	09-24-02 04:47 AM