3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread - Page 18

aceflier · 10-25-08, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hell_of_doom227

That's interesting cause i hit 19747 with two GTX280SLI. Hmmm.

I'm running these cards at speeds 756/1512/2500 need to update my sig I hit 21k now.

**WeReWoLf** · 11-04-08, 08:03 PM

12719 at stock speeds

Q9550, 4Gb DDR800, GTX280.

sws · 11-12-08, 07:14 PM

Vantage Score P22792
CPU Score 43644
Graphics Score 19661

Cant link through since im using non WHQL beta driver for 280GTX's

usecom · 11-21-08, 06:52 AM

http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=19

H8500 3Dmarks
CPU Score 36513
Graphics 7487

I got this message under the driver approval Policy :

Please note that this result does not comply with the rules defined in the Driver Approval Policy for 3DMark Vantage and will not be visible on default result search on the ORB or on the Hall of Fame. Please ensure that you are using approved display drivers and system software versions provided with 3DMark Vantage or use the "Disable PPU" option.

What does that mean?

usecom · 11-21-08, 07:23 AM

After disabling the PPU option I got this score.

http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=19

3D MARK score P11197
GPU 11026
CPU 11744

hell_of_doom227 · 11-21-08, 07:07 PM

Blacklash · 12-12-08, 07:17 AM

Here's my first try with my new build, P30133-
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=589907

image-
http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?i...vantageiz7.jpg

I've got one old 192SP card with two Core 216s. I ended up with two Core 216s because that is what I was sent when I ordered vanilla EVGA GTX 260s off of Newegg.

I haven't tried it with PhysX off yet.

Blacklash · 12-15-08, 07:40 AM

Vantage with the CPU @ 4.03GHz = about +600 pnts-

It's now P30732
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=598308

Blacklash · 12-16-08, 01:56 PM

I decided to try Vantage with my CPU @ 3.2GHz to see how much FPS I'd lose in the graphics test.

There's Vantage on my rig @ 3.2GHz.

http://img236.imageshack.us/my.php?image=van32zv1.jpg

My other score is in the above post.

Keep in mind we're talking about a 1280x res with no filtering and Tri-SLi. Ignore the score and look at FPS in GPU test 1 and 2.

Test 1 = 71.11FPS vs 79.93FPS
Test 2 = 75.46FPS vs 80.6FPS

Obviously @ 1920x those differences would be much smaller. So it looks like even a 3.2GHz 920 is fairly solid support for well overclocked GTX 260 Tri-SLi.

There's the Vantage GPU score with extreme quality settings with my CPU @ 3.2GHz. GPU score is 14479.
http://img120.imageshack.us/my.php?i...remegpunc0.jpg

Blacklash · 12-20-08, 10:56 AM

Downclocking fix got me a couple of FPS. I'm up to P30955 now.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=611891

Albo · 01-04-09, 01:30 AM

My crappy PC

Specs are at the bottom

always overclocked

Eliminator · 01-04-09, 02:43 PM

broke 15k with specs in sig

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=644373

11-04-08, 08:03 PM	#206
WeReWoLf Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 5,014	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread 12719 at stock speeds Q9550, 4Gb DDR800, GTX280.

11-12-08, 07:14 PM	#207
sws Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 14	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread Vantage Score P22792 CPU Score 43644 Graphics Score 19661 Cant link through since im using non WHQL beta driver for 280GTX's __________________ Cosmos S \| QX9650 @3.5ghz \| Asetek OEM Water Cooling\| EVGA 790i Ultra Sli \|4 X 2GB DDR3 Corsair \| 3 X BFG280 GTX OCE \| X-Fi Xtreme Gamer(removed no space) \| Corsair HX100W \| Dell 30" & 2 x 20" Screens

11-21-08, 06:52 AM	#208
usecom Tifosi Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In a house Posts: 2	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread http://service.futuremark.com/result...&resultType=19 H8500 3Dmarks CPU Score 36513 Graphics 7487 I got this message under the driver approval Policy : Please note that this result does not comply with the rules defined in the Driver Approval Policy for 3DMark Vantage and will not be visible on default result search on the ORB or on the Hall of Fame. Please ensure that you are using approved display drivers and system software versions provided with 3DMark Vantage or use the "Disable PPU" option. What does that mean? __________________ ASUS Vento 3600 BFG 280 GPU Intel QuadCore Q9650 3.00 GHz OCZ Vista Ready DDR2 RAM 8GB 2x 7200 RPM SATA HD's 1X 250 GB 1X 500GB SHARP 40" LCD HDTV 1080P G15 Gaming Keyboard Air cooled Thermaltake fans x3 2 in 1 out Thermaltake 700W Toughpower PSU SONY CD/DVD DUAL LAYER burner 780iSLI Evga Motherboard All stock speeds and air cooled. Vista Ultimate x64

11-21-08, 07:23 AM	#209
usecom Tifosi Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: In a house Posts: 2	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread After disabling the PPU option I got this score. http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=19 3D MARK score P11197 GPU 11026 CPU 11744 __________________ ASUS Vento 3600 BFG 280 GPU Intel QuadCore Q9650 3.00 GHz OCZ Vista Ready DDR2 RAM 8GB 2x 7200 RPM SATA HD's 1X 250 GB 1X 500GB SHARP 40" LCD HDTV 1080P G15 Gaming Keyboard Air cooled Thermaltake fans x3 2 in 1 out Thermaltake 700W Toughpower PSU SONY CD/DVD DUAL LAYER burner 780iSLI Evga Motherboard All stock speeds and air cooled. Vista Ultimate x64

11-21-08, 07:07 PM	#210
hell_of_doom227 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,387	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread Nice __________________ System: eVGA x58SLI x16 4Way Classified, Intel Six Core i7 X980@4.00Ghz, 6Gb GSkill DDR3-1600, Tri Crossfire 3xATI Radeon 5870 1Gb, Raid1 - 2xSSD Intel 80Gb X-25M, Raid0 - 2xHDD Samsung 2Tb, Raid1 - 2xHDD Samsung 1Tb, LG Blue-Ray/HD-DVD Player, Silverstone 1100W PSU, Intel Stock Cooler (New One), Thermaltake Xaser VI, LG 27" LCD, Logitech Keyboard G15, G5 Logitech Mouse OS: Windows 7 x64 35708 - 3DMark Vantage http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=2109601

12-12-08, 07:17 AM	#211
Blacklash 8^9^3 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Old Vizima Posts: 3,679	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread Here's my first try with my new build, P30133- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=589907 image- http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?i...vantageiz7.jpg I've got one old 192SP card with two Core 216s. I ended up with two Core 216s because that is what I was sent when I ordered vanilla EVGA GTX 260s off of Newegg. I haven't tried it with PhysX off yet. __________________ Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)\|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB) ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)\|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980\|4604)\|ASUS PA246Q WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)\|Pioneer DVR-2920Q\|LG GH22LS30\|Klipsch PM20 2.0 SilverStone OP1000-E\|SilverStone TJ10-B\|Thermalright U-120 Extreme\|Win 7 HP x64 Last edited by Blacklash; 12-15-08 at 02:48 AM.

12-15-08, 07:40 AM	#212
Blacklash 8^9^3 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Old Vizima Posts: 3,679	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread Vantage with the CPU @ 4.03GHz = about +600 pnts- It's now P30732 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=598308 __________________ Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)\|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB) ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)\|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980\|4604)\|ASUS PA246Q WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)\|Pioneer DVR-2920Q\|LG GH22LS30\|Klipsch PM20 2.0 SilverStone OP1000-E\|SilverStone TJ10-B\|Thermalright U-120 Extreme\|Win 7 HP x64

12-16-08, 01:56 PM	#213
Blacklash 8^9^3 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Old Vizima Posts: 3,679	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread I decided to try Vantage with my CPU @ 3.2GHz to see how much FPS I'd lose in the graphics test. There's Vantage on my rig @ 3.2GHz. http://img236.imageshack.us/my.php?image=van32zv1.jpg My other score is in the above post. Keep in mind we're talking about a 1280x res with no filtering and Tri-SLi. Ignore the score and look at FPS in GPU test 1 and 2. Test 1 = 71.11FPS vs 79.93FPS Test 2 = 75.46FPS vs 80.6FPS Obviously @ 1920x those differences would be much smaller. So it looks like even a 3.2GHz 920 is fairly solid support for well overclocked GTX 260 Tri-SLi. There's the Vantage GPU score with extreme quality settings with my CPU @ 3.2GHz. GPU score is 14479. http://img120.imageshack.us/my.php?i...remegpunc0.jpg __________________ Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)\|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB) ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)\|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980\|4604)\|ASUS PA246Q WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)\|Pioneer DVR-2920Q\|LG GH22LS30\|Klipsch PM20 2.0 SilverStone OP1000-E\|SilverStone TJ10-B\|Thermalright U-120 Extreme\|Win 7 HP x64

12-20-08, 10:56 AM	#214
Blacklash 8^9^3 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Old Vizima Posts: 3,679	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread Downclocking fix got me a couple of FPS. I'm up to P30955 now. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=611891 __________________ Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.96GHz (1.36v)\|Mushkin 998681 XP3-12800 (3x2GB) ASUS TUF Sabertooth (X58)\|ASUS GTX 580 DirectCU II (980\|4604)\|ASUS PA246Q WD VelociRaptor 150GB HD (x2)\|Pioneer DVR-2920Q\|LG GH22LS30\|Klipsch PM20 2.0 SilverStone OP1000-E\|SilverStone TJ10-B\|Thermalright U-120 Extreme\|Win 7 HP x64

01-04-09, 01:30 AM	#215
Albo Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: MA, USA Posts: 3,633	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread My crappy PC Specs are at the bottom always overclocked Attached Thumbnails

01-04-09, 02:43 PM	#216
Eliminator The Man With Brisk Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 1,673	Re: 3DMark Vantage Benchmark Results Thread broke 15k with specs in sig http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=644373 __________________ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.6GHZ Asus P5B Deluxe 4GB OCZ Platinum PC8000 EL BFG GTX 280 OC2 1GB @ 729/1512/2538 Dell 2405FPW 24" 3DMark: Vantage - P15397 \| 06 - 18734