Geforce GTX 280 Performance, Price and Pictures!

[ragejg]

Do not escalate this thread into a flamefest by name-calling etc.

Useless members do that crap. Don't be a useless member here.

Soetdjuret it seems that you like to get into these kind of arguments. Take that kind of behavior somewhere else.

It stops now. Thank you in advance.

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by Soetdjuret

No man, u still can't use it as "roughly" comparision for real world performance in games as its only one of the factors from how a card performs. And "based on the information we have" is a graph that shows performance in bars. One bar is this high, and the othe bar is 4 times higher, why would nvidia make the bar 4 times as high if it was less than double the performance? Then they would make the bar 80% higher aka 4/5th times higher.





I don't think anything you "moron?", i speak from the graph nvidia released and are using logical thinking, am not assuming anything here! Mathematics or logical thinking, words against words.. theories against theories. What can i say? The mathematical theory says its 1.8 aka 80% faster if you guess that the nubers on the far left side really is "times faster", but that wouldn't correspond to the bars. The logical theory is that the bar is 4 times as high in a performance chart then this would mean its 4 times as fast, logically. So noone can really say witch one is right as we dont know what the numbers on the left means, we can only guess here. I'd like to see on things from the logical side.

Ps, there's no need to flame and behave like a kid. Youre welcome to take part in this discussion if you feel so. But keep doing as you did in your first post is gonna make your time on nvnews short believe me.

I am calling you a MORON because that is exactly what you are and when these cards are out we will all see just how much faster they really are compared to an 8800Ultra and I will be laughing my ass off at you just like I am right now and so will everyone else that has seen your stupidity.

[ragejg]

STOP IT.

Get back to topic in a civil fashion.

Your asses WILL be kicked out of here if you don't civilize.

[xbob]

Originally Posted by ihatedumbpeople

Soetdjuret you are a complete and utter moron if you really think that the GTX280 is going to be anywhere close to being 4X as fast as an 8800Ultra. In order for that to be the case we would have to see a total and complete new architecture instead of just increased shaders etc.


Elegy's Figures are much much more believable than yours and pretty much fall in line with what everyone else thinks. I really do not think you should be the one to question any body elses mathematic skills either. LMAO.

You have 4 post and they are all negative or inflamatory, simmer down there fella'!

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by ragejg

STOP IT.

NO

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by xbob

You have 4 post and they are all negative or inflamatory, simmer down there fella'!

What can I say.............I just hatedumbpeople. LOL.

[Elegy]

No man, u still can't use it as "roughly" comparision for real world performance in games as its only one of the factors from how a card performs. And "based on the information we have" is a graph that shows performance in bars. One bar is this high, and the othe bar is 4 times higher, why would nvidia make the bar 4 times as high if it was less than double the performance? Then they would make the bar 80% higher aka 4/5th times higher.

Why would they make the bar four times as high when it's only 80% faster? Because it makes their product look faster and better, it's as simple as that. That's what companies do, day in day out. If the GTX280 really was 4x faster, we would know about it for sure and nVidia would make it perfectly clear on that graph. I've shown you two independent sources - the graph and the specifications of the Ultra and the GTX - to back up my theory. What backing do you have for yours?

[ragejg]

lol is right. You just stopped this thread from functioning.






People, until a mod takes care of business here, let's just not post in this thread... wait for the mess to be cleaned up a bit and then get back to discussing the matter at hand.

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by Elegy

Why would they make the bar four times as high when it's only 80% faster? Because it makes their product look faster and better, it's as simple as that. That's what companies do, day in day out. If the GTX280 really was 4x faster, we would know about it for sure and nVidia would make it perfectly clear on that graph. I've shown you two independent sources - the graph and the specifications of the Ultra and the GTX - to back up my theory. What backing do you have for yours?

Elegy give it up. This guy you are arguing with is the biggest dumbass to ever grace the face of any internet forum. Just do a search and read other post and topics from him to see for yourself.

You have backed up your figures and all he has done is spew FUD from his stupid pie hole with no backing of his own which is what I find hilarious.

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by ragejg

lol is right. You just stopped this thread from functioning.






People, until a mod takes care of business here, let's just not post in this thread... wait for the mess to be cleaned up a bit and then get back to discussing the matter at hand.

[DHP]

Originally Posted by mailman2

This is just a G92 with more shaders, I doubt we are going to see double the performance.

+ 512 bits memory interface
+ 2200MHz GDDR3
+ 1GB GDDR3
+112 more shaders
+ 50% better shader efficienty/ performance
+ only 25W idle!!!:





It will rock!!!

[ihatedumbpeople]

Originally Posted by DHP

+ 512 bits memory interface
+ 2200MHz GDDR3
+ 1GB GDDR3
+112 more shaders
+ 50% better shader efficienty/ performance
+ only 25W idle!!!:





It will rock!!!

It will rock for sure and I cannot wait to get one but I am also realistic about it as I know better than to think that it will be 4X faster than the last gen cards.