| Newegg Daily Deals |
| View Poll Results: Are they cheating again? | |||
| Yes |
|
132 | 67.01% |
| No |
|
53 | 26.90% |
| I don't have a clue by four. |
|
12 | 6.09% |
| Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 597
|
__________________
System 1: 2500xp@3200|1gigHyperXPC4000|AbNF7s|Fortissimo7.1|SonyDJV700|DvdR+&CDRW|160gbHD |9800pro|21"IBM-P260 System2: 2500xp@3200|abitNF7-s|512XMS|9700pro|160Gbhd System3: 2400xp|512xms|Epox 8rda+|9500pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
eat. sleep. overclock.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
|
im still a little unsure... because these latest drivers have given improvements in games too... (but more in benchies such as 3dmark03)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
eat. sleep. overclock.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Agent-Fx
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: everywhere
Posts: 2,216
|
i think ExtremeTEch is completly misleading people..
THose Horrible screenshots are not noticeable to the GAmers ,only to the developers (not Nvidia ) that have access to 3dmark2003 from others camera points of view.. Imo.. if the GAmer cant notice any decrease in IQ then i see *no problem* for more performance. without noticeable decrease in IQ. i think Extremetech and the Guys behind this... we know who they are... ATi is simply Crying like ladies! because the Nv35 kicked the ass, of R350.. in games!!! where it matters.. ![]() Last edited by Nv40; 05-14-03 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 826
|
Way to work it prerendered-man NV40
![]() source - moose i believe. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 365
|
Problem is, people have been noticing slight visual anomalies (pixel smearing). Look in this forum for a thread started by AnteP.
Nothing worse than fanboys who always defend their favored IHV, no matter what. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 826
|
So you're saying that extremetech was paid off by ati to expose this "kinda different" notion of rendering outside of camera track view.
And you have the balls to say "quak, quak". rogo |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
eat. sleep. overclock.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 17,744
|
doesnt whql check for this stuff??? because these same drivers have been whql'd
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 826
|
ANd the balls to say this:
"finally! HardOcp dicovers AMerica... : and dispelling the myth of the "always" superior IQ of ATI. why it took so long for them to realize what everybody knows since years? ATI have been doing this (part time) filtering since the Radeon 8500.. it only have been improved abit recently but still nowhere close to Nvidia. a technique that looks good in (STILL screnshots) ,but in real motion if you care to notice you will see less IQ when you compare it with Nvidia AF ,more noticeable when there is no flat surfaces." Your conclusion, based on many different premises that you've proposed in other threads (above), is fallacious (princippo princippi) and hence will be looked upon as completely inane. Infact The few posts I've just read of yours are so inane that I can't believe that you are serious! Rogo |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
should be at a lecture
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Loughborough Uni/Aylesbury, UK
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
MuFu. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Agent-Fx
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: everywhere
Posts: 2,216
|
Quote:
yes , but we have already sites and Users Claiming that Nvidia latest DEtonatorsFX drivers Fixed 3dmark2003 issues... so until you can proof me that those "slight" errors , replicates in EVERYONE!!! using the DEtFx , then i see the Extremetech report, Baseless on non FUndamental FActs.. if those "slight" errors does not happens in everyone using the DetonatorsFx then this clearly means is not in his drivers the Issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 4,944
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
[SIZE=1][I]"It was very important to us that NVIDIA did not know exactly where to aim. As a result they seem to have over-engineered in some aspects creating a power-hungry monster which is going to be very expensive for them to manufacture. We have a beautifully balanced piece of hardware that beats them on pure performance, cost, scalability, future mobile relevance, etc. That's all because they didn't know what to aim at." -R.Huddy[/I] [/SIZE] |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 | Ferianto85 | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-18-12 08:35 PM |
| Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability | ViN86 | Rumor Mill | 6 | 05-09-12 04:48 PM |
| NVIDIA could rule if they really wanted to | Vid_craze | NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series | 25 | 08-16-02 05:24 PM |