| Newegg Daily Deals |
| View Poll Results: Are they cheating again? | |||
| Yes |
|
132 | 67.01% |
| No |
|
53 | 26.90% |
| I don't have a clue by four. |
|
12 | 6.09% |
| Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#205 | |
|
3Dlabs Wildcat IV 7210
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 52
|
Buyer error, case closed
![]()
__________________
I am Dork. |
|
|
|
|
|
#206 | |
|
Nordic Nerd
|
Quote:
-The fanATIc infidels are committing suicide by the hundereds outside nVidias office in Santa Clara. Our initial assasment is that they will all lie before they die. |
|
|
|
|
|
#207 | |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
|
#208 | |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Quote:
SPECviewperf - A benchmark for users of professional 3D applications, which uses those very same professional applications in it's tests. Two very different kinds of benchmarks if you ask me.
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 489
|
Umm you cannot say 3dmark03 is a useless benchmark after everybody went completely ape**** over the prelim 5900 benchmarks which showed it quite ahead in 3dmark03, predicting how a card will do based on a "useless" benchmark is so hypocritical its not even funny
Why would Nvidia tell people that a benchmarking program is not recommended for use with their cards until issues are resolved, and then try to make it seem like their cards rule by cheating with the results of the benchmark program which people shouldn't be using in the first place because it is inaccurate? |
|
|
|
|
#210 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
|
What?
__________________
muzz |
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Regardless of people's opinions of 3DMark, I don't see how regarding it as useless or a lazy way to test a card has anything to do with the issue at hand, it doesn't change the simple fact that nVidia cheated on a widely-used benchmark, and has set a dangerous precendent for this kind of thing in any kind of benchmark or timedemo.
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
|
Man Cowboy, ever since you changed that Avatar of yours I see a completely different guy.. and TBO I liked the other guy better
![]()
__________________
muzz |
|
|
|
|
#214 | |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Quote:
The longer they leave it untouched, the further the 'nVidia are cheats' reputation will spread, and the last thing nVidia need right now is to be dragged through the mus over and over again. The sooner it's fixed, the more chance of it being forgotten.
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
|
#215 | |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
|
Quote:
![]() Again, breaking 3DMark totally on nVidia cards would set a dangerous precedent. What next? nVidia don't like the way Half-Life 2 runs on their cards, so they deliberately break the game in the drivers? It won't happen obviously, but the way nVidia are thinking these days I sometimes wonder. To start breaking applications in drivers would be childish in the extreme, and certainly the final nail in the in the coffin that would lay the 'superior nVidia drivers' ghost to rest.
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Quote:
Sorry, I had to say it ![]() (ignore me.. im bored)
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 | Ferianto85 | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-18-12 08:35 PM |
| Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability | ViN86 | Rumor Mill | 6 | 05-09-12 04:48 PM |
| NVIDIA could rule if they really wanted to | Vid_craze | NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series | 25 | 08-16-02 05:24 PM |