Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

View Poll Results: Are they cheating again?
Yes 132 67.01%
No 53 26.90%
I don't have a clue by four. 12 6.09%
Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-15-03, 12:13 AM   #37
gokickrocks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 409
Default



i have been spectating for awhile now and feel that i need to chime in...

has anyone noticed that once the nv35 got caught cheating, some people on this forum act like it never happend and are accusing ati of doing a hack of the same degree? then there are also those that say it is just nvidia's way of trying to show that they can optimize, yet when they were confronted with the issue, they call it a "bug" and are investigating the issue...if they were trying to prove a point, wouldnt they outright proclaim it?...

those same people that were gloating about the nv35's score in 3dmark are now condemning futuremark...you cant have it both ways

then there are some that believe that ati does poorly in games...it seems fine to me and i run it at 6xAA 16xAF 1280x1024 and i never see the screen come to a crawl...but my card must be 1 in a million, cause those people that dont own it, surely must know better
__________________
"never argue with an idiot, they will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience"

Last edited by gokickrocks; 05-15-03 at 12:17 AM.
gokickrocks is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:19 AM   #38
mreman4k
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Kakilaki, USA
Posts: 74
Send a message via AIM to mreman4k
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
indeed..

ATi have plenty of Access to 3dmark2003 source code ..
while Nvidia not.. so they can "optimize" the way the want
to get better scores ,just for 3dmark2003..
i dont see ,the fairness here... at all .

so that why i dont care too much about numbers in
Syntetic benchmarks like 3dmarks /SHaders marks/RIghtmarks
and others..

they can be "legal" and at the same time manipulated
their programming to benefits more ,one IHV video card
arquitecture . (cough) PS1.4 video cards..

if Nvidia Nv30 were not delayed by 6months ,the
"standar" now in DIrectx9 will be other.

for me the real BEnchmarks are games.,
and here is where ATI now have trouble .
nVIDIA specifically chose not to be able to access the source code so thats in their hands. This is an outright cheat and is not morally right in giving the average consumer clouded conclusions of what the best video card is. But who is morally right nowadays? That is why I choose not to give my money to nVIDIA...all goes back to the GF4 MX thing...everyone cheats though, but I choose to make an example out of nVIDIA...rofl
mreman4k is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:30 AM   #39
Behemoth
radeon 9800 pro
 
Behemoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Darkness Falls
Posts: 841
Default

3DMark itself is bad enough for average gamer who doesnt understand how good the actual game card is capable of in real world performance due to things like special path and special support, due to its a vague indication of actual real game performance.
Behemoth is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:30 AM   #40
Moose
Cheating is for losers!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
indeed..

ATi have plenty of Access to 3dmark2003 source code ..
while Nvidia not.. so they can "optimize" the way they want
to get better scores , just for 3dmark2003..
i dont see ,the fairness here... at all .

huh???

ATI can optimize all they want yet it is Nvidia who have optimized the hell out of this benchmark to the point of creating a clip plane in every frame of the benchmark.

That must have been an enormous ammount of work. All for the sole purpose of cheating the benchmark and deceiving consumers. There is no way to sugar coat it at all.
Moose is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:34 AM   #41
StealthHawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Let me chime in here.

Doing this in a synthetic benchmark is totally unfair. It is cheating, as it artificially inflates scores in comparison to other cards, which render everything.

Now, is this cheating if done in GAME benchmarks like timedemos? Maybe yes, maybe no. I think if NV3x cards do the same thing when you're actually playing a game, then no, it's not cheating. Because it is representative of real world performance.

Looks like nvidia got something out of 3dfx after all. 3dfx's uber 1337 software HSR routines
 
Old 05-15-03, 12:41 AM   #42
ChrisW
"I was wrong", said Chris
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: standing in the corner!
Posts: 620
Default

Let's not forget that nVidia was a beta member of Futuremark until December. They chose not to continue their membership because they would not optimize their code specifically for nVidia cards. As far as source code goes...do you think they destroyed all the information they had about 3DMark03? It's not like they didn't know exactly how it worked in December.
ChrisW is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:43 AM   #43
PreservedSwine
I'm always hungry
 
PreservedSwine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 548
Default

I wonder if Nvidia will "recall" these drivers? Not likely, but damn, that is one BIG error. I can already see all the screenshots floating aroufn the web as soon as you go "off the rail" so to speak.
PreservedSwine is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 12:58 AM   #44
Lucien1964
Registered User
 
Lucien1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 89
Default

MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! I remember the day when Nvidia swore by 3dmark.I'm sure the 5900 is a kick @ss card.Why cheat???It will just hurt them more getting caught cheating.I dunno peeps but trusting Nvidia again will be a tough task.
Lucien1964 is offline  

Old 05-15-03, 01:05 AM   #45
jjjayb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
so does 3Dmark difference indicate splinter cell performance difference?
No. But if they are running this hack on 3dmark03 then they could just as well run it on the splinter cell timedemos. Then it could be that the Splinter Cell timedemo benchmarks aren't indicitave of real Splinter Cell performance when you are actually playing.
jjjayb is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 01:09 AM   #46
bkswaney
Mr. Extreme!
 
bkswaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 3,421
Send a message via Yahoo to bkswaney
Default

My 3DM03 scores are the same with the 43.51 WHQL and Det 44.03's.
They might very well have a bug but it's not messing up it's score.
Now my games and 3DM01 went way up.

I think ET is just trying to stir up $h!t.

Just my 2 cents.
Also I've not see any problems in 03 myself.
__________________
Notebook!
Compaq Presario CQ60-215DX
AMD 64 Athlon X2 @ 2GHz (QL62)
15.6 inch HD WideScreen
Nvidia 8200M-G 895mb
2Gig system ram
250Gig SATA 5400rpm HDrive
Vista Premium
bkswaney is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 01:15 AM   #47
bkswaney
Mr. Extreme!
 
bkswaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 3,421
Send a message via Yahoo to bkswaney
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
yes , but we have already sites and Users Claiming that
Nvidia latest DEtonatorsFX drivers Fixed
3dmark2003 issues...

so until you can proof me that those "slight" errors ,
replicates in EVERYONE!!! using the DEtFx ,
then i see the Extremetech report,
Baseless on non FUndamental FActs..

if those "slight" errors does not happens in everyone
using the DetonatorsFx then this clearly means is not
in his drivers the Issue.
I agree... I've run it 6 times and now I see nothing wrong.
My IQ is BETTER than with the 43.51's. Speed about the same.
Maybe 100 points higher.

Plus these are WHQL cert. They must meet MS's eye.
bkswaney is offline  
Old 05-15-03, 01:15 AM   #48
MrNasty
MrNasty
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deli
Posts: 213
Default

I must say that what nvidia has done is downright appaling.


Effectivly trying to pull the wool over the entire gamer community in the hope to make a quick buck.

They flipping hand crafted the PRE RENDERED culling routines to remove so much information.

What nvidia has done is invalidated the becnhmark, heck they might as well of included a prerendered mpeg of all the scenes and just stuck that in and culled the rest.

Ultimately dispicable and really is proof of my distrust of nvidia and in general corporations at large, Im sure ATi is no clean slate either.

Hypoicarcy comes to mind "we don't care about 3dmark because they wont include special rendering routines to make the benchmark look different and run different on our card"

"so we will sneak them into our drivers"
__________________
You are not your system specs.
MrNasty is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 Ferianto85 NVIDIA Linux 0 05-18-12 09:35 PM
Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability ViN86 Rumor Mill 6 05-09-12 05:48 PM
NVIDIA could rule if they really wanted to Vid_craze NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series 25 08-16-02 06:24 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.