|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto-CAN, Hamburg-DE, Prague-CZ
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
Just in case you're in hurry ATI already has such option. j/k ![]()
__________________
Stop The Meter On Your Internet Use ------------------------------------------------------------ Core i7 980X EE @ 4316 MHz 1.35V - Corsair Hydro Series H50 ASUS Rampage II Extreme - Corsair Dominator 1600MHz 12GB Triple-Channel Sapphire HD 6990 - ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe Intel X25-M 160GB 34nm G2 SSD - Seagate Barracuda 1TB 32mb Cosmos S Case - Corsair HX1000W PSU Pioner Blu-ray Burner 6X BD-R - Westinghouse LVM-37w3, 37inch 1080p Logitech G25 Racing Wheel - Logitech Cordless RumblePad 2 Sennheiser RS 180 - Windows 7 64-bit Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Rayne
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
|
Quote:
The 512bit bus is a must if you want to keep the 32 ROPs, cause, nVidia's ROPs are too weak compared to ATI's ROPs. And stronger ROPs means strong AA performance. More shading power won't help with the AA performance. If they want to create a real 'big bang' this is what they should do. Also, remember that traditionally, nVidia cards have seen big jumps in performance with the bandwidth increases.
__________________
ASUS Rampage Formula X48 | Xeon 3350 @ 3.6 GHz (450x8/1.26v) | 4x1GB OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 Reaper CL3 @ 900 MHz 3-4-4-15 | 1 x eVGA GTX 285 SSC | 1 x ASUS EN8800GTX (PhysX/CUDA -> Burnt by nVidia 196.75 driver) | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty PCIe | 1 x Intel X25-M G2 80GB | 2 x 750GB WD RE2 7500AYYS SATA2 16MB | Samsung SH-B083L SATA | Enermax Revolution 1250W | Samsung SyncMaster 275T 27" 1920x1200 | Thermaltake Black Armor | BloodRayne 2 FSAA Patch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
YAAY TRICK!!!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
__________________
Mobo: Asus P5N-E SLI 650i (Come on X-mas) CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU/Q6600 @ 2.8ghz 1250fsb/Zalman 9500 Memory: 2 X 2048MB Corsair XMS2 6400@625mhz 4-5-4-15-2t 1:1/Dominator Fan GPU: 2 X GeForce 9800 GTX In SLI @ 715mhz c.c./1782mhz s.c./2.25ghz m.c.(1xBFGoc2 1xEVGA) PPU: Geforce Physx Enabled Hard Drive: 2 X 300GB Seagate Barracuda R.I.P. /120GB Maxtor P.A.T.A(crap) Monitor: 28" Hanns G HG281 1920 x 1200/50" Phillips 720p Sound Card: Creative X-fi Xtreme Gamer Speakers/Headphones: Creative Inspire 5.1 Surround Sound Operating System: Windows Vista™ Home Premium Service Pack 1 3Dmark03: 61,921 3Dmark06: 15,213 Vantage: 13,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 760
|
^^^ The 6800 Ultra came out before the 6600GT
But back on topic, from a price perspective, 512bit AND GDDR5 ain't happening IMO One or the other, but not both. I will gladly welcome it, and if it does happen I will take back these comments, but I just don't see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus
Posts: 4,152
|
AFAIK you need an nForce board for 3xSLI@16x PCIe 2.0. Of course, you might not care at all... But, from my personal experience (it might be the board too, as it was a 750i vs my current 780i), SLI seems a little better on my current setup (16/16, was 16/8 on my 750i). So, you might want to stick to just 2 280s on your X58 board...
__________________
Fafnir: Intel Core 2 Quad 6600@3.2Ghz|eVGA 780i SLI|PNY GTX480 |Kingston DDR667 4096MB|WD Black Caviar 500GB|Seagate SATA 250GB|Seagate SATA 200GB| Seagate SATA 160GB|OptiArc AD-7173S DVDRW|Nec 3351 DVDRW|Creative X-FI XM|LG Flatron W2261V|Logitech X-530|Thermaltake Armor|Amptac 850W SLI PSU|Logitech G9 Mouse|Xigmatek HDT S-1283 CPU Cooler|Windows 7/FW 257.21 PS2 - Wii - Xbox - Xbox360 - PSP - GC - PS3 Owner Boycott Starforce... Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
|
I for one am sick and tired of getting this refresh jumble crap....next 261, then 262, then 263 etc each with 2-3% increase in peformance, then ahh hell then put 2gpus on same board and add gddr4 ram, then heck why not another version with gddr5 ram, then shrink the die and release it as a IDK? "REFRESHED" release then carry the improved die to next actual next generation....to me seems like they are selling us their R&D testbeds.
WTF was the 9xxx series about anyway? 9800"GTX" my butt, correct me if I'am mistaken but "GTX" has always reflected the absolute top of the line in performance for NVIDIA, yet my 8800gt would smoke it, the entire 9XXX was a farce, they were worse/same across the board in performance as the 8xxx, and 2-3 weeks later we have 2xx released. One card each gen is my rule of thumb....they can take their minimal imp releases and shove up their unimproved arses.
__________________
Primary: I7 920 DO step @4 GHZ *ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 * 3x2gb GSkill DDR3 1600 * ATI 5870HD * Enermax Infinity 720w PSU * WD caviar Black 2TB * Coolermaster 840 case * SAMSUNG TOC T260HD * Win7 64bit/Linux Dual Boot* Eheim 1250 pump/ MC-TDX cpu block/ DD-5870 block/ Feser Monsta TFC XChanger 360 radiator/ Feser Triebwerk TK-121 x3 2nd:E8400 @3.7ghz/ 4GB(2/2gb)PC2-6400 DDR2 800) Crucial Ballistixs / GA-P35-DS3P/ Creative X-Fi Music Extreme/ Seasonic M12 SS-600HM/ WD5000AAKS/ ASUS CB-5216A/ ASUS DVD-E818AT/ Visiontek 4870 512mb w/thermaltake V2(40idle/70load)/ Win XP/ ViewSonic VG2230wm OLD: AMD Opteron165/ MSI 7100 Platinum NEO NF4/sli / 1GB Geil Ultra Platinum pc4000 ddr500/ Creative X-Fi/ Enermax 465/ 75Gb WD Raptor/ WD4000AAKS/ 8800GT/ ViewSonic VX924 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|