|
|
#1 | |
|
Powered By nVidia
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 554
|
Hey Guys
I was just wondering, which cpu i should upgrade to...i'm not planning on upgrading board/cpu yet, just want to upgrade from my 3000+ to the maximum cpu my board can take (GA-K8N51GMF-9-RH) I can get either Athlon 64x2 4800+(E6,Toledo,90nm,1MBx2) or Athlon 64 FX60(E6,Toledo,90nm,2MB) Its only for Gaming... Thanks - Grechie
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 || XFX nForce 790i Ultra || Corsair XMS3 PC10666 DDR3 2 X 2GB || 2 x GTX 295 Quad SLI || Antec 900 || Thermaltake Tough Power 1200Watt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
It's just a ride....
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Your Sisters Bed
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
4800+ all the way, that was my last chip before upgrade below, ran all games superbly, also ran the FX55 for a while, preffered the dual core 4800+ everytime.
__________________
Sigs Are For Heros! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Powered By nVidia
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 554
|
thanks heaps for the fast response!
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 || XFX nForce 790i Ultra || Corsair XMS3 PC10666 DDR3 2 X 2GB || 2 x GTX 295 Quad SLI || Antec 900 || Thermaltake Tough Power 1200Watt |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,566
|
no no no. The FX60 is a dual core and the fastest and last chip they released for socket 939. If they are the same price go for the FX60 by all means!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,726
|
The 4800+ X2 is 2 x 1MB cache running at 2.4Ghz. The FX 60 is 2 x 1MB cache running at 2.6Ghz. The FX-60 has an unlocked multiplier so it might help you OC a little easier however, from my experience the FX-60 is almost topped out so I could only get it up to 2.8ghz. The 4800+ X2 might be able to hit 2.8Ghz as well, so it's really a toss up.
You can also look at an Opteron 180 (same as 4800+ x2) or an Opteron 185 (Same as FX-60 but locked multiplier) Any of those processors will make a big difference, it's mainly up to price and availability. IMO the difference between any of them is going to be minimal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
I could get to my desktop and run most benches at 3.1Ghz with my FX-60... but 3.0Ghz was the max stable OC. Board was an ASUS A8N32 SLi Dlx, 4GB DDR500 RAM, dual 640MB 8800GTSs, and Vista Ultimate x64. Was a super fast system, chewed through everything I threw at it. Almost wish I didn't sell it. It was ultra stable, and ultra fast.
My vote should be obvious. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|