|
|
#37 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
|
Please tell us when fix this bug??? Nvidia ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 1
|
I'm getting this hang with 177.82 and 180.11 on my T61 Thinkpad with an Quadro NVS 140M. As reported by others, the first start of X after power-up is short and sweet, but each successive restart of X results in a 30 second delay after which everything appears and runs normally. I'm running Fedora 9 which starts X twice during a normal boot-up (once for the graphical boot, and again for graphical login). By removing the "rhgb" parameter from the grub kernel parameters, I can get the system to start up very quickly.
FYI, I've tracked the problem down to the open() call of /dev/nvidia0. The full strace output which shows this is attached. Here's an excerpt 19:50:35.001976 chown32("/dev/nvidia0", 0, 0) = 0 19:50:35.002113 open("/dev/nvidia0", O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) = 12 19:51:05.710293 ioctl(11, 0xc040464d, 0xbfca1650) = 0 19:51:05.710478 open("/proc/interrupts", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 13 Note that it takes the open() call 30 seconds to complete. Ken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered Fox
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
|
Not fixed in 180.41, 4 times worse in new series ...
nvidia developers, are you still aware of this bug, and is there a slight chance that this will be fixed in the future? |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
|
seems they just ignore this issue ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 55
|
rm -f `modinfo nvidiafb | grep "filename:" | awk '{print $2}'`
![]() DO NOT USE NVIDIAFB with NVIDIA modules simultaneously!!! ![]() 1. exec # Xorg -scanpci 2. find you card pciid add to xorg.conf Section "Device" BusID "2:0:0" EndSection and Section "Screen" Option "NoInt10" "true" EndSection Last edited by AaronP; 03-23-09 at 01:36 AM. Reason: Remove obnoxious SIZE="7" tags |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |||
|
Registered Fox
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks anyway. Fuchs |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Registered Fox
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
|
*sigh*
Could we at least have a comment on this, nvidia? Thanks. Fuchs |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,487
|
The status is still the same as when I replied before: the bug has been identified and is being investigated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Registered Fox
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Registered Fox
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
|
After 5 tests I'd say the problem is gone with 180.44.
Could somebody else please confirm? @Zander or AaronP: Was there any fix regarding this issue? Because it seems to be gone, and it would be nice to see this ported to new releases (as current beta still has it) as well. If it really is: thanks a lot nvidia. Fuchs |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help Installing NVIDIA Tesla M2070Q in Linux RHEL5 | Ferianto85 | NVIDIA Linux | 0 | 05-18-12 08:35 PM |
| Rumor regarding lack of 680 availability | ViN86 | Rumor Mill | 6 | 05-09-12 04:48 PM |
| rh7.3 and nvidia | vcrispo | NVIDIA Linux | 11 | 07-31-02 08:57 PM |