| Newegg Daily Deals |
| View Poll Results: Do you use Raid or not | |||
| I use a Raid config like, Raid 0, 0+1 etc |
|
19 | 54.29% |
| I don't use Raid |
|
15 | 42.86% |
| I Might try Raid, once I learn how switch on my Pc |
|
1 | 2.86% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
I am wanting to find out how many here actually use Raid in their rigs and how many do not.
I am a fan of Raid as it is definite speed advantage over normal drive configurations. So i have decided to have a vote on it to see some sort of ratio of who does and who does not. Come on now get voting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Moving to new home
|
No raid here until I buy a new WD 500G disk to do an amazing 1Tb Raid0
__________________
Intel Quad Core Q6600 @ 3,4 | 4Gigs (2x2) OCZ Reaper PC-8500 | Gigabyte P35-DS3R | Western Digital 500G Caviar SE16 SATA2 NCQ | Seagate160 Gig 7200.9 SATA NCQ | Maxtor 300Gig SATA NCQ | Asus Geforce 260GTX | Samsung Syncmaster 930BF 19'' | BeQuiet Straight Power 700W | Cooler Master CM690 |Windows Vista x64 SP2 |Windows XP SP3 [Deceased PSU, no money for new one, stucked with laptop and XBOX 360] Macbook Pro 13': 4gigs | Core2 Duo 2,53Mhz | 250Gigs HDD |geforce 9400M| aluminium unibody | Mac OS X 10.6.2 Snow Leopard |gentoo Linux 2.631 kernel Wolfhound΄s Brute: http://wolfhound77.mybrute.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
R.I.P. Babe Thread
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,387
|
I have used Raid in the past and was cool, but having to back everything up to DVDs before a reformat sucked. I'd only suggest Raid if you have at least 3 HDDs, not just 2. I may do it, again, someday, but for now, it's just 2 separate HDDs for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
not coming back
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,872
|
I used RAID0 for 6 years. It offers very little performance boost for real world workstation usage. I don't use it anymore as I found separating my drives gave a greater boost in performance and reliability.
C:- OS, pagefile D:- storage, downloads E:- game and large app (AutoCAD) installs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
|
Got my two 500gb seagates in soft raid1.
Dunno know though if it was wise to do this. It's stable but i dont know if it helps performance or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 2,371
|
Its not work it, don't bother.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
.<<o>>.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,763
|
Funny coming from a "guy" not even running RAID.
I for one found the speed increase noticeable, so I'd say it's worth it as long as you have a third backup drive! ![]() Here's MaximumPC's raid vs single drive benchmark scores:
__________________
: :Benq FP241W : : Optoma HD80 Projector + 92" Screen : : Genelec 8020B speakers : : Sony MDR-XB700 Headphones : : Razer Lycosa : : Razer Lachesis : : |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,998
|
I had Raid 0 and loved it, the only reason I changed to a WD640 is because the 36GB Raptors were so damn noisy it was driving me nuts. If I get another 640 I will Raid 0 them for sure.
__________________
EVGA GeForce GTX 680 PCP&C 750 Quad ASUS 12x BD-ROM DELL U2412M E-IPS Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Logitech Z5500 5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 28
|
Two WD 300 GB VelociRaptors in RAID 0 here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Raid is a "must" for any storage type of pc I run, but it can't be substituted as a backup plan either.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Clitoriacetal
Posts: 596
|
RAID0:
2x Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB Good performance AFAIC. It's fast enough for me and plenty of storage. I have a Maxtor 80GB (which is 6 years old already lol) and a good old 7 year old 80GB IBM Deskstar and 400GB Barracuda in a non-raid config. The drives not part of the RAID0 array feel slower (not very odd though) My old server uses RAID0 and RAID5 which also works pretty well, too bad the drives are complete **** these days: RAID0: 2x Seagate Cheetah 9.1GB 10000RPM RAID5 (mostly important files): 5 x Seagate Cheetah 9.1GB 10000RPM RAID5 (webserver contents and MSDN images: 6x Seagate Cheetah 9.1GB 10000RPM RAID5 works pretty well, when a drive fails you just pull it out and replace it with a new one. Then you pray until it's finished rebuilding the array :P As expected RAID is not a replacement for backups |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Un-Ripped
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Canaduh!
Posts: 1,968
|
Quote:
My guess is that those Cheetahs might be close to their MTBF. EDIT: I would think about getting rid of that RAID 0 array very soon if i were you.
__________________
Evga X58|I7 965 3.8GHz|Ultra 120 Extreme|Evga GTX 480 SC|2 x Intel X25-M 80GB RAID 0|Intel 520 - 240 GB|WD Black Caviar 1TB|6GB Corsair XMS3 1600C8 |Corsair 1000W PSU|Antec Twelve-Hundred|DELL U3011|Logitech G500|Logitech G19 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Get a Radeon 9700 now or wait for the NV30? | sancheuz | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 88 | 02-19-03 04:40 PM |
| GeForce4 Ti 4400 problem with RAID motherboard | hydr0 | NVIDIA GeForce 7, 8, And 9 Series | 10 | 10-26-02 01:06 AM |
| RAID question? | MUYA | CPUs, Motherboards And Memory | 7 | 09-20-02 01:37 PM |