Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. - Page 3

**FastRedPonyCar** · 05-06-09, 09:48 PM

still waiting for the gtx300....

**FastRedPonyCar** · 07-07-09, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FastRedPonyCar

still waiting for the gtx300....

just kidding. Yeah I'm waiting for it but apparently per another thread my youngest brother wanted an upgrade for his 8800gts and gave me the $$ to buy a fellow forumite's GTX275. It looks like he's wanting a dog instead (lol random) and now apparently I will be upgrading to the 275.

So hopefully I'll see a few more FPS over the 8800.

trivium nate · 07-07-09, 07:29 PM

i should do another cryis benchmark on ym new system and warhead to if i can ever get teh program to work

07-07-09, 10:30 PM

I don't have the game (yet) but I downloaded the demo and set the resolution to 1920x1080 then set everything to very high and set AA to 0 and also 4 then tried out DX9 vs DX 10. Here is what I got

7/7/2009 10:27:11 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 20.165 (Min FPS: 14.84 , Max FPS: 23.25 )
NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:34:39 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.17 (Min FPS: 19.47, Max FPS: 30.42 )
NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:42:03 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.135 (Min FPS: 19.70, Max FPS: 30.58 )
NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:47:48 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 52.68 (Min FPS: 38.91, Max FPS: 65.55 )
NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:51:31 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 1920x1080 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.485 (Min FPS: 29.59, Max FPS: 47.26 )

Seems Directx 9 and no AA runs best for me. I don't mind turning off AA at that high of a resolution but is there much of a difference visual wise between DX 9 and DX 10? It is hard to tell in the demo benchmark. Also does the real game run better with it's patches than the demo did for people that own the game(s)?

Kemo · 09-28-09, 09:02 AM

wow i thought 2 gtx285's would run much better. guess not.

JasonPC · 10-11-09, 07:41 PM

The demo gets very bad performance compared to the full version with patches.

trivium nate · 10-11-09, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kemo

wow i thought 2 gtx285's would run much better. guess not.

the benchmark? i think it does to the game runs better than the benchmark

JasonPC · 10-12-09, 10:36 AM

Well even for the benchmark that is very bad for 2 gtx 285s but it's the demo so that's why. I installed the demo on my friend's computer and he has a gtx 275 and it ran pretty poorly but figured it was because it was the demo.

gerardfraser · 10-14-09, 04:53 AM

Did some Crysis Warhead runs for someone,just thought I put it here too

Soetdjuret · 10-18-09, 10:50 PM

Very interesting thanks!

Soetdjuret · 01-13-10, 05:03 PM

*Reserved slots for screenshots*

Soetdjuret · 01-13-10, 05:04 PM

*Reserved slots for screenshots*

05-06-09, 09:48 PM	#25
FastRedPonyCar Resident Tire Destroyer Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Montgomery, AL Posts: 3,008	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. still waiting for the gtx300.... __________________ - Desktop - Core I7 D0 revision 920 @ 3.75 ghz - XSPC Rasa 750 RS240 H2o Cooling - EVGA GTX 680 @1325mhz - ASUS P6T Deluxe - 128 gig Crucial RealSSD C300 - 150 gig Velociraptor +2.75 Terrabytes of WD Sata 3.0 storage - 12 Gigs Mushkin DDR3 1600 - 910 watt PC P&C PSU - Saffire Pro 40 firewire audio interface w/ Adam A7 studio monitors - Corsair Obsidian 650D case - Win 7 Pro x64 - PCBank 2700 27" LED - Laptop - MSI 16F2-012 - i7 2630QM - GTX570m @ 750Mhz - 8 gigs HyperX 1866 - 120 gig OCZ Vertex 3 SSD- 750 gig Scorpio Black - BluRay - 95% Gamut Screen - IC Diamond goop

07-07-09, 07:29 PM	#27
trivium nate Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 4,023	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. i should do another cryis benchmark on ym new system and warhead to if i can ever get teh program to work __________________ CM-HAF-932//AMD Phenom-II-X4-965-BE-Deneb-3.4 GHz-Quad Core//CorsairH50 ASRock 770 EXTREME3 Mobo//EVGA GTX-480(1536MB GDDR5)-Arctic Cooling Accelero Xtreme+cooler 180GB SSD//3TB//G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB//DVD-RW//blu-Ray//1000 Watt Corsair PSU 42"Vizio TV-1920x1080-1080P-120Hertz//Win 7 Ultimate(64)//XBox360-pc controller Saitek Eclipse 2 keyboard//Razer DeathAdder Mouse//250gb-Xbox 360//160gb-PS3

07-07-09, 10:30 PM	#28
betterdan Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. I don't have the game (yet) but I downloaded the demo and set the resolution to 1920x1080 then set everything to very high and set AA to 0 and also 4 then tried out DX9 vs DX 10. Here is what I got 7/7/2009 10:27:11 PM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 20.165 (Min FPS: 14.84 , Max FPS: 23.25 ) NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:34:39 PM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.17 (Min FPS: 19.47, Max FPS: 30.42 ) NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:42:03 PM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.135 (Min FPS: 19.70, Max FPS: 30.58 ) NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:47:48 PM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX9 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 52.68 (Min FPS: 38.91, Max FPS: 65.55 ) NEXT BENCH RUN- 7/7/2009 10:51:31 PM - Vista 64 Run #1- DX9 1920x1080 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.485 (Min FPS: 29.59, Max FPS: 47.26 ) Seems Directx 9 and no AA runs best for me. I don't mind turning off AA at that high of a resolution but is there much of a difference visual wise between DX 9 and DX 10? It is hard to tell in the demo benchmark. Also does the real game run better with it's patches than the demo did for people that own the game(s)?

09-28-09, 09:02 AM	#29
Kemo The Smite Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 217	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. wow i thought 2 gtx285's would run much better. guess not. __________________ Core2Quad Q9550 @ 3.61Ghz (425x8.5) evga 680i SLI (T1 Version) 8GB Corsair XMS PC8500 5-5-5-12 (SPD) DDR2@850Mhz 8800 GTX SLI Corsair 750W PSU

10-11-09, 07:41 PM	#30
JasonPC Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,103	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. The demo gets very bad performance compared to the full version with patches.

10-12-09, 10:36 AM	#32
JasonPC Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,103	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. Well even for the benchmark that is very bad for 2 gtx 285s but it's the demo so that's why. I installed the demo on my friend's computer and he has a gtx 275 and it ran pretty poorly but figured it was because it was the demo.

10-14-09, 04:53 AM	#33
gerardfraser Registered User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 237	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. Did some Crysis Warhead runs for someone,just thought I put it here too

10-18-09, 10:50 PM	#34
Soetdjuret Teh lazy swede Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Svea Posts: 1,978	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. Very interesting thanks! __________________ R.I.P Stage6 \| per haud Justiciá illic exsisto haud pacís...

01-13-10, 05:03 PM	#35
Soetdjuret Teh lazy swede Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Svea Posts: 1,978	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. Reserved slots for screenshots __________________ R.I.P Stage6 \| per haud Justiciá illic exsisto haud pacís...

01-13-10, 05:04 PM	#36
Soetdjuret Teh lazy swede Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Svea Posts: 1,978	Re: Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me. Reserved slots for screenshots __________________ R.I.P Stage6 \| per haud Justiciá illic exsisto haud pacís...

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Crysis 3 preview	News	Gaming Headlines	0	06-16-12 07:20 AM