Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-13-09, 04:54 PM   #13
|MaguS|
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnaddel View Post
That Project Offset trailer looks nowhere near crysis. More Dark Messiah 'ish than that actually. Nothing wrong with a game being similar to Dark Messiah though!
Um think they ment on a graphical level, not gameplay.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 05:12 PM   #14
sillyeagle
sillyego
 
sillyeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 5,394
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxFX View Post
Yeah offset will probably be something special as its supposed to be Intels Larrabee push so it will be exiting to see if and how much raytracing it will get as we know thats what Intels talks about

So heres hoping that it will be the next big thing!
Phil Taylor was Senior PM at MS ACES studio before he went Intel to work on Larrabee. He is a very active blogger and forum junkie, so his Larabee blog is packed full of insider info.

http://www.futuregpu.org/
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem Quad @ 4.0GHz
EVGA GTX 660 SLI @ 1046MHz
OCZ Platinum CL7 6GB
EVGA Intel X58
_____________
A man's dreams are an index to his greatness.
sillyeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 06:15 PM   #15
nekrosoft13
I'm Geralt
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicagoland, once a year in Poland
Posts: 24,366
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Medion View Post
I think devs are more console-centric than they've ever been. Most games are made with consoles in mind, and as such, you generally see a slightly upscaled version on the PC. On the plus side, I've noticed more PC games come to market without the need for a patch. I own several games that don't even have a patch available.
how is no patches a plus side? games still have bugs, you just don't get any fixes for them
__________________
Windows 8 the next big failure, right after Windows ME
nekrosoft13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 06:23 PM   #16
MaxFX
*BANNED*
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 580
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sillyeagle View Post
Phil Taylor was Senior PM at MS ACES studio before he went Intel to work on Larrabee. He is a very active blogger and forum junkie, so his Larabee blog is packed full of insider info.

http://www.futuregpu.org/
Okey nice will check it out to se what going on
And as jolle said, think his spot on. the difference to the eyes arent that easy to made anymore as we allready come this far. just take a look at just Crysis and it's hard to se how they can do much for atleast know to blow that away. it will take time and much better/stronger hardware for that I think. and it's pretty good as it is as it looks crazy so now wheres the next gfx hardware that can make the damn Crysis playable

And e.x Mirrors Edge how good dont that game look and plays supersmoth. that is one game that impressed me a lot and a nice, fun on top of that so what more do one need.
Forget, FEAR2 dont look that shappy eatier. looks pretty awesome I think so im more then happy
MaxFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 06:29 PM   #17
MaxFX
*BANNED*
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 580
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolle View Post
The framerates you get with modern high end GPUs can attest to that.


But I think we´re really starting to see the that steep curve on diminishing returns.
You need alot more power to push the quality a step further, the higher you go.
(for example, if you add 1000 polygons to a Quake 1 model, its huge improvement, if you add 1000 polys to a character in crysis, its not going to be that big a difference)

And aliasing is a bigger issue now then ever really, a good example of that is something I noticed a really long time ago.
First time I ran Dawn, the NV tech demo, with and without high levels of AA, the difference there was pretty much the difference between realtime and offline rendering.

And now that´ve really started to use SSAA a whole lot, you notice the huge difference in IQ it does.
One of the early sequences in Crysis Warhead where the character moves through some vegitation, that sequence was night and day with and without SSAA.
MSAA really doesnt help much at all in such scenarios, and using TSAA type solutions will result in probably worse performance then pure SSAA as you´re now doing MSAA and SSAA on pretty much the entire screen, possibly more as there are layers of textures with transparency.

The creeping and crawling you get in the image in motion with aliasing and also with lacking texture filtering becomes more and more of an issue the better the graphics you get, as it contrasts a whole lot more with the image then in for example Quake 1.


Raytracing dont seem that much of a real lift to realtime IMO.
You can do exact reflections, and some other stuff, but a raytraced shadow, like a stencil shadow need alot of work to become soft, and that is really expensive.
It´ll prolly be another tool in the toolbox though, alot of offline rendering today use some raytracing for certain stuff, where its appropriate, but not for everything.

Judging by developer response is not really something they´re all that excited about, but rather something Intel want´s to use to leverage the game onto their playing field, to compete with NV and ATi who has been in the realtime rasterizing business for years and years.. but again, it´ll be another tool to work with.
+1 very well said and as you say the devs dont really seem that overhyped about it. as Carmac and the other top devs says it will be a mix of them both to get it to the future as they can take a litte from here and a little from there so to speak
MaxFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 06:47 PM   #18
NarcissistZero
Loving Everything Me
 
NarcissistZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,033
Send a message via AIM to NarcissistZero
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

I agree with others that consoles are holding things back a bit, but PC games are really still progressing and looking better and better despite that. As someone who played the Xbox versions of Fallout 3, Mirror's Edge and Left 4 Dead, I promise you that the PC versions of those games are more than slightly enhanced, looking much better even on the base assets level.

I don't think anyone is in a rush to challenge Crysis... maybe if Crysis sold way over expectations and made PC gaming hip again, but it didn't sadly. I think some games like Mirror's Edge and Cryostasis challenge Crysis when maxed out, but don't quite match it. We probably won't see something that really trashes Crysis until the next generation of consoles come out (though games like Rage, Bioshock 2 and Dragon Age might surprise us, if given their PC due like I bet they will be).

(I wonder if the PS4 and Xbox 640 will even have games which surpass Crysis on max settings? The Wii could easily influence them to scale back their technological improvements. I don't even know when we'll see the next consoles... I think it might be a while).
__________________
I gots one of them high powered gaming computers with an EVGA GTX 480 video thingy and a Q9550 processing device and also one of them Windows 7 64 operating programs with 4GB of some Corsair 1033 DDR2 ram.

Steam, Xbox Live and PSN: StingingVelvet
NarcissistZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 08:01 PM   #19
XDanger
Whaaat?
 
XDanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Crysis killed it for the next 2 years.

If only CE2 had Physx effects and destructible enviroments It would be perfect.

That and HL2 CM level textures.
__________________
2500K 4.4ghz,P8P67Pro,120gb Force3, 12gb Vengeance,R9290,TX850v2,W7HP,LaCie Blue 22" crt COMMODORE 64 Silver Label 1Mhz/128D 4Mhz(Z80)
XDanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-09, 09:46 PM   #20
Buio
Registered User
 
Buio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolle View Post
But I think we´re really starting to see the that steep curve on diminishing returns. You need alot more power to push the quality a step further, the higher you go. (for example, if you add 1000 polygons to a Quake 1 model, its huge improvement, if you add 1000 polys to a character in crysis, its not going to be that big a difference)
Which does put some more understanding in why NVidia are pushing PhysX and going for general GPU processing etc.

To be honest, I think animation, AI and physics can add as much to immersion as graphics and I look forward to more development in those areas.
Buio is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 02-14-09, 02:25 AM   #21
ASUSEN7900GTX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,646
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

i think people might see crysis as a tech demo tha a game as crytek stopped the support of patches many bugs still keep the game har on any hardware and warhead well that was more of a game than crysis.

I think crytek did a ubi(double agent) on crysis and left it as it was since maybe they knew the game wasn´t finished, and where is that rumored patch with super graphics they talked about? Yet a sales trick?

well i enjoyed fallout 3 adn some other games now i will sink into FEAR 2 and left 4 dead ok no crysis graphics but could still ahve a lot of value as a game

well anyways there will be challengers to crysis and who knows what crytek is cooking up mean while.
__________________
Intel I7 920
gigabyte HD6970 2gb
6GB DDR3
Asus P6t deluxe V2

"be to others as you want others to be against you"
some wiseass came up with it
ASUSEN7900GTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-09, 02:53 AM   #22
LycosV
Registered User
 
LycosV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 888
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

I think NarcissistZero nailed it. We aren't going to see killer graphics until the next gen consoles come out. PC games just don't have the market potential that console games do, and because of that noone invests a lot of time into PC exclusives.

Once the next generation of consoles comes out we'll see a huge jump in graphics and then stagnation again, it's a cycle.
LycosV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-09, 03:46 AM   #23
Lfctony
Registered User
 
Lfctony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus
Posts: 4,152
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekrosoft13 View Post
how is no patches a plus side? games still have bugs, you just don't get any fixes for them
That's not what he said Nekro. He said that many games come out without needing a patch, which is a good thing.
__________________
Fafnir: Intel Core 2 Quad 6600@3.2Ghz|eVGA 780i SLI|PNY GTX480 |Kingston DDR667 4096MB|WD Black Caviar 500GB|Seagate SATA 250GB|Seagate SATA 200GB| Seagate SATA 160GB|OptiArc AD-7173S DVDRW|Nec 3351 DVDRW|Creative X-FI XM|LG Flatron W2261V|Logitech X-530|Thermaltake Armor|Amptac 850W SLI PSU|Logitech G9 Mouse|Xigmatek HDT S-1283 CPU Cooler|Windows 7/FW 257.21

PS2 - Wii - Xbox - Xbox360 - PSP - GC - PS3 Owner

Boycott Starforce...

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
Lfctony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-09, 05:48 AM   #24
ralinn
Masters
 
ralinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK, England, Portsmouth
Posts: 1,675
Default Re: Game graphics hitting a wall?

Hmm, I still wouldn't go as far to say that consoles are holding PCs back. I think they're completely different things. If anything, I'd say Crysis held the PC back... like NarcissistZero said, Crysis didn't do as well as expected. There's only a minority of people willing to pay out the money that Crysis requires to play at its full potential and I don't think thats the fault of consoles. IMO the Crysis jump was too far too soon. Developers have learnt from that and aren't willing to go all out on graphics when they can still make things look amazing on current hardware.

I said it before, I'll say it again. It's easy to create a game with great graphics like Crysis but Art and Art direction is everything if you want to make a game look good and run on current hardware. A fine example of this would be Mirror's Edge PC and COD4 PC. I'd even stretch to say WoW as there are a lot of people that still love its style and it also runs great on their PC.
__________________
(CPU) Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz @ 1600MHz (ASUSTeK Computer INC. P6T DELUXE mainboard) (RAM) 3GB (HDD) 931GB
(GFX) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 (1GB), 1680x1050x32, 59Hz (OS) Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium (SP1)

3Dmark06 Score: Who the **** actually cares?
360 & PSN ID: ralinn
ralinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thoughts from console owners on NVIDIA's GEFORCE GRID MikeC Console World 11 05-27-12 08:43 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.