|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9
|
nice app, can it tell what kind of deint would be supported with HD decoding ?
here's my bench : 8400GS 256M PCIE (G84) Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 738.163 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 760.007 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 75 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 44 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 119 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 222 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 411 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 78 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 28 fields/s Code:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00GHz NVIDIA GPU GeForce 8400 GS (G84) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0) VDPAU API version : 0 VDPAU implementation : Unknown SURFACE GET BITS: 727.17 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 782.1 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 78 frames/s MPEG DECODING (1280x720): 155 frames/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 44 frames/s H264 DECODING (1280x720): 90 frames/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 122 frames/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 229 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 390 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 78 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL + SKIP_CHROMA (1920x1080): 108 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 28 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL + SKIP_CHROMA (1920x1080): 31 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (720x576 video to 1920x1080 display): 111 fields/s Last edited by flux; 06-04-09 at 01:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 75
|
Well I installed the qt4-qmake package, ran "qmake-qt4", which did not return any errors and then "make". Do I need any more packages? Using ubuntu jaunty.
only the first two tests work (on 0.2), others fail on "can't initialize xx-codec!" results: (8600m GT, 180.60) SURFACE GET BITS: 581.8 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 435.437 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 43 pic/s |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 24
|
The MGS4 movie problem is fixed in 185.18.14 NVIDIA Driver.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...4&postcount=10 Also it provides stable results of qvdpau (VDPAU with PowerMizer). Test 1 Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 1157.47 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 1252.8 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 78 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 45 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 127 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 2319 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 4129 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 832 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 305 fields/s Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 1155.1 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 1249.63 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 78 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 45 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 127 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 2315 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 4129 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 831 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 305 fields/s Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 1113.79 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 1250.02 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 78 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 45 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 127 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 2315 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 4133 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 831 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 305 fields/s NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-185.18.14. I bought this card four days ago and I was surprised that the easy-to-find bugs remained. I think the reasons are them: 1. This forum doesn't accept free mail accounts. No one wants to provide critical mail accounts only for reporting bugs. Sourceforge or free software projects accept free mails. 2. You don't say "thanks" to the bug reporters. I checked the release note, but there are no "(reported by someone)" credits. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show...40&postcount=1 Did you find all the bugs by yourself? I think the reporters feel happy if they find their handles in the release notes. People will report bugs with pleasure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
You can use all but TEMPORAL_SPATIAL with HD decoding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 75
|
I upgraded to the latest driver 185.18.14 and now somehow all tests work for me
Results on 8600m GT: Quote:
I'm also not very impressed by my results, compared to others... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18
|
QuadroFX 1800 768MB (G94), Xeon X5550 @ 2.66GHz, 185.18.10, no compiz
SURFACE GET BITS: 887.187 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 884.409 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 77 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 45 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 121 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 1494 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 2705 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 531 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 186 fields/s I suppose I expected better results for how much the card costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 39
|
185.18.10
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
|
Acer Aspire Revo, Atom 220 Nvidia ION/9400M
185.18.14, no compiz Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 273.16 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 217.767 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 57 pic/s H264 DECODING (1920x1080): 51 pic/s <= surprisingly high VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 65 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 284 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 441 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 98 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 31 fields/s |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 60
|
Hi, again
Does somebody know, whether PCI-E V1.0 is faster or equal to PCI-E V2.0 ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13
|
Code:
SURFACE GET BITS: 1019.35 M/s SURFACE PUT BITS: 1059.77 M/s MPEG DECODING (1920x1080): 79 pic/s VC1 DECODING (1440x1080): 127 pic/s MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 2631 frames/s MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 4926 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 1035 fields/s MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 399 fields/s 2.8Ghz Core2 CPU, FB-DIMM RAM @ 1600MHz KDE desktop, on Fedora 10 / x86_64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
"PCI-SIG announced the availability of the PCI Express Base 2.0 specification on 15 January 2007.[16] PCIe 2.0 doubles the bus standard's bandwidth from 0.25 GByte/s to 0.5 GByte/s, meaning a x32 connector can transfer data at up to 16 GByte/s for both videocards (SLI 2x etc). PCIe 2.0 has two 32-bit channels for each GPU (2x16), while the first version only has 1x16 and is operating at 2 GHz." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Valve to release its trailer-making tool: Source Filmmaker | dikinher | Gaming Central | 2 | 06-28-12 12:28 PM |
| xorg locks-up with newest nvidia drivers w/ vdpau. | theroot | NVIDIA Linux | 1 | 06-24-12 11:04 AM |
| Load Testing with the Cloud ' This Week on inside* Publications | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 05-20-12 05:30 PM |
| Portal 2 Perpetual Testing Initiative Starts Now | News | Latest Tech And Game Headlines | 0 | 05-08-12 05:00 PM |
| tv tool 6.8 | thcdru2k | NVIDIA Windows Graphics Drivers | 4 | 10-18-02 01:10 PM |