Go Back   nV News Forums > Software Forums > Gaming Central

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-04-09, 08:58 PM   #1
NarcissistZero
Loving Everything Me
 
NarcissistZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,033
Send a message via AIM to NarcissistZero
Default Long development time... does it pay off?

I just wrote a post about Doom 3 that made me realize it has been 5 years since iD has released a real game of their own, and Rage is still not coming for a while yet.

Remedy has taken like 6 years on Alan Wake so far.

We all know the other stories of long development, from Half-Life 2 to Starcraft 2 and everything in between.

My question is: in your opinion, does a long development time automatically mean a better game?

Some of my favorite games of all time were made in a much shorter timespan, like Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, made in two years and change. Fallout 3 was released less than three years after Oblivion... hell Fallout 2 was released a year after the first.

Do you notice a statistical relationship between long development and better quality?
__________________
I gots one of them high powered gaming computers with an EVGA GTX 480 video thingy and a Q9550 processing device and also one of them Windows 7 64 operating programs with 4GB of some Corsair 1033 DDR2 ram.

Steam, Xbox Live and PSN: StingingVelvet
NarcissistZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-09, 09:04 PM   #2
Zhivago
*BANNED*
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 184
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

Fallout 3 uses the same (or a very similar) engine to Oblivion, and you can't go by time between releases, since a company can potentially be working on many different projects at once. Generally speaking, a longer development time leads to better results in my experience. But sure, there are exceptions of course.
Zhivago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-09, 09:12 PM   #3
CaptNKILL
CUBE
 
CaptNKILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

I don't think its GOOD to have a long development cycle, but I don't think it means the game will be worse.

IMO, its hard to compare games based on how long they took to develop. For example, Fallout 3 may have taken only 2 1/2 years and has a fairly large game world, but I'm willing to bet that it contains less unique (ie, not reused) art assets and less "hand crafted" content than something like Half-Life 2: Episode 2.

The same with Fallout 2. It basically reused all of the assets from the first game, so they didn't have to spend all that time making new graphics and sounds.

I don't think long development time can always be justified but I think its rather difficult to say whether it effects how "good" a game will turn out to be. You can bet that a game with a long development time would not have been anywhere near as good if it had been pushed out two years early.

So I guess what I'm saying is, some games benefit from long development times, others don't. It depends on the game and the team behind it.
__________________
---- Primary Rig ---- CoolerMaster 690 II Advance - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz + Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v)
Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA
ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64
---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU
Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
CaptNKILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-09, 10:06 PM   #4
egamer11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 161
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

id is a lazy boy!
egamer11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-09, 10:58 PM   #5
kuddles
Registered User
 
kuddles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

It's hard to tell. Yes, a lot of games with long development periods tend to turn up better, because it means way more playtesting and polish, but that's only because most studios that can actually afford to take that long usually already had a massive hit or so that gives them that benefit. (Valve, Blizzard, etc.). Of course it's no guarantee. Valve and Blizzard for instance also have good business sense. One need only look at games like Vanguard or Duke Nukem Forever to see that just working on a game for a long time with a perfectionist attitude alone doesn't guarantee greatness.

You also need to take into account how people have a biased perception. People remember the games that could have used more development time, or the games that become massive critical and sales successes because they chose to wait. But the games that take a long time to make and end up being duds are quickly forgotten from most gamer's mind. For example, Mercenaries 2 was released and most people dismissed it as a potentially fun but buggy, unfinished game, something EA has released in the past. People forget that EA already gave Pandemic an entire 2 extra years of development and they still didn't manage to correct all the bugs. It's doubtful that more time would have solved that problem, or if it did, that it would sell enough to justify that amount of extra time, especially with how dated both the graphics and mechanics would have become.
__________________
Your favourite game of last year was over-rated, generic and contained poor level design.
kuddles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-09, 11:11 PM   #6
Greg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,177
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

I'm sure there is some correlation between the rush = crap, take time = quality, however I believe it really boils down to the skill, discipline and unity of the development team.

Good development practices ensure the best quality possible is ready at almost any time. Teams with a shared vision and complimentary skills will be highly productive. A short development period with realistic goals and risk management can produce reasonable software.

Schedules can also depend on how much technology is ready and known from previous successful projects, and how long the team has worked together. Finally, management has to allow a development team to succeed rather than obstruct it. This is really a massive subject to discuss, so I'll just leave you with those thoughts to prevent a long winded rant.
Greg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-09, 02:06 AM   #7
Atomizer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 379
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

Duke is the ultimate example of this, but not the only one, Vanguard had potential which would have been better if it got more funding and wasnt forced to release, but honestly, would things have changed if they had of gotten the funding? probably not, shorter development cycles can be limiting but it can also keep developers focused, though sometimes longer development times can only be for the better, it really depends on the dev team and the manager.
I mean look at Blizzard and Valve, long development times, but I cant say a single game they have done is bad, I have loved them all.
Atomizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-09, 02:26 AM   #8
jeong
GRS is MDS
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Take a guess
Posts: 152
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

I wouldn't say longer would always imply better. SC1, HL1 only took about 2 years to make whereas their respective sequels took and will likely to take 6 years or more. The general trend in the industry seems that an anticipated sequel must be as good as or better than the predecessor, hence it takes longer to make as a result of players' as well as developers' expectations. But there're some outstanding games that were made in 4 years or less like GW, Crysis, not to mention MW1, which was only 2 years in the making. Games like Q3A, Doom 3, Mass Effect, Diablo 2, Fallout 3, SF4, GTA4 are excellent excellent games which I don't know of their development cycles.
__________________

J1 \ J2

CPU: i7 940 @ 3.34GHz \ QX6700 @ 2.66GHz
Mobo: EVGA x58 SLI E758 \ Asus nforce 590i
RAM: OCZ DDR3 1600MHz 12GB @ 9-9-9-24 \ Micron DDR2 667MHz 4GB @ 5-5-5-15
HDD: 4TB WD C (2x Black, 1x Green) \ 4.5TB WD C (2x Black, 2x Green)
GPU: EVGA Geforce GTX 295 quad SLI \ BFG Geforce 8800 GTX
M & K: L NEW! G19 & G500 \ G15 & G5
SC: Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro
Headset: NEW! ATH-AD900 \ SS 5H V2 USB
PSU: Tt Toughpower 1200w \ CM RPP 750w
Case: A1200 \ Dell XPS 710
LCD: Dell U2410 H-IPS + LG L246WP-BN 24" P-MVA \ LG W2243T-PF 21.5" TN 1080p
OS: Genuine W7 x64 Pro \ "
Cooler: Megahalems + 2x Scythe S-F push/pull E/W
\ TRUE 120 + 1x tr push
jeong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-09, 03:01 AM   #9
jlippo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 532
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

For small teams it may be the only choice like in case of Remedy and Alan Wake.
jlippo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-09, 04:15 AM   #10
NarcissistZero
Loving Everything Me
 
NarcissistZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,033
Send a message via AIM to NarcissistZero
Default Re: Long development time... does it pay off?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomizer View Post
shorter development cycles can be limiting but it can also keep developers focused
I think keeping developers focused is a great point... if you feel like you have all the time in the world, you might shoot for the stars and try to create something too grand... then a few years later you realize it is unmanageable and you spend another couple years cutting things down and refocusing.

Knowing you have 2 years to make a great game might keep you focused on a single unique idea, or on polishing an old one. Look at Modern Warfare... the focus was basically "take Call of Duty and make it modern"... simple and clear focus, 2 years, great results.
__________________
I gots one of them high powered gaming computers with an EVGA GTX 480 video thingy and a Q9550 processing device and also one of them Windows 7 64 operating programs with 4GB of some Corsair 1033 DDR2 ram.

Steam, Xbox Live and PSN: StingingVelvet
NarcissistZero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.