|
|
#1 | |
|
I'm Geralt
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicagoland, once a year in Poland
Posts: 24,364
|
According to the latest roadmap from Microsoft, it would appear that Windows 8 will arrive sometime in 2012. This would follow a three year product cycle that would keep it in line with Vista and Windows 7 releases.
The road map is clear about the targeted date and does not try to hide the fact that the code name is "Windows 8". Little else is known about the OS other than its targeted date of release. ![]() http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/1...le+Feedfetcher
__________________
Windows 8 the next big failure, right after Windows ME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Sayonara !!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
|
It's not a client OS road-map, but interesting that they speak about Windows 8 specifically
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,352
|
Windows 8 is a major update so Windows 7 is a minor update of Vista?
__________________
Intel Core i7 3770K, Corsair H80 liquid cooler with Noctua S12-1200 fan, ASUS P8Z77V with UEFI 1606, 16GB Samsung Green 30nm DDR3-RAM, Pioneer DVR-217DBK 22x DVD-RW, Corsair AX850 PSU, Western Digital 2TB SATA3 hard drive, Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic, CanonScan N650U scanner, Microsoft Internet Keyboard, ASDA Wheel Mouse Optical, Sirus's 2 3D speakers, 32inch Sharp LC32LE600 LED TV, EVGA Geforce GTX 670 SC 4GB with Geforce 306.23 driver, 30Mb broadband Virgin Media VMDG480 Super Hub, Aspire Xplorer Midi Tower, Windows 8 Pro 64bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I like how they just left Vista off the map.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
My experience with it is that it works without trouble, even on my EeePC. Like my Vista did... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 6,863
|
Quote:
More or less 2008 = vista, 2008 r2 = 7? But vista was much earlier than 2008 and later than 2003 r2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Sayonara !!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
|
Windows 7 is essentially Windows Enterprise. Still, not a server based implementation so not sure why the Windows 7 name is in there. Win2k8 R2 would have sufficed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
Looks like MS is back to their 3 year cycle.
So Windows 8 will actually be Windows 7.0 right? Or will it be 6.2? This numbering scheme is horrible ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Sayonara !!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
|
Quote:
![]() But then again, who knows, besides the Microsoft team working on this ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,538
|
Read on ars about some very cool progress they are making with win min, and we might see a core server from it very soon.
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/new...slims-down.ars |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|