|
|
#1 | |
|
Bring me Amberlamps
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,167
|
Crysis:
http://www.pr0ductive.com/hardware/w...ming/page5.asp L4D: http://www.pr0ductive.com/hardware/w...ming/page6.asp Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,413
|
It looks like there's not much of a improvement if any over XP. Even the 64 bit isn't.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ducking & Dodging
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,948
|
I don't think there needed to be. XP users have older PCs with less resources ...and that is where windows 7 shines. Its nice to not have to drop another 5% FPS with an unoptimized OS. When Vista launched I lost alot of FPS in Vista vs XP. Win7 has much more mature drivers and the OS seems to be much more finished than Vista was when it RTM'd. Im running Windows 7 on my Inspiron 5100 with 2.4Ghz single core CPU and 1GB ram and it runs great. Thats what Windows 7 is all about!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,413
|
This test was done with a new system not old.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ducking & Dodging
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,948
|
right, but they never mention how Win7 runs as good as XP on older machines. All the reviews focus on games or office, never just the OS compared to Vista and XP.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|