|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: GREENVILLE,TX
Posts: 3,851
|
I just can't believe nvidia is that worried about ATI .Even I was thinking about getting a HD5870 and use one of my nvidia cards for PhysX ,but it looks like with the new drivers nvidia put a stop to that .If you want to use a old nvidia card for your PhysX ,you better have a nvidia card as your primary card.This to me looks to hurt nvidia ,what did they have to worry about ,don't they have a big enough market share as it is.
__________________
Intel i7-3820+Corsair H-100+ASROCK X79-Extreme4+16gigs G.Skill PC1600DDR3+2-ASUS DirectCU II GTX-670 in SLI+Crucial 256g-SSD+2- Samsung 1-TB+2-WesternDigtial 640g+LG-12x Blu-Ray Burner+1100w CoolerMaster+Antec-P280 case+50" Plasma PM6700+Logitech Mouse+Keyboard+Pioneer VSX-1020+Polk Audio Speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,352
|
No, Nvidia not worried about ATI. It because ATI didnt wanted their cards to take or share advantage of physx driver, ATI is against physx so they wanted Havok, OpenCL and Direct Compute.
__________________
Intel Core i7 3770K, Corsair H80 liquid cooler with Noctua S12-1200 fan, ASUS P8Z77V with UEFI 1606, 16GB Samsung Green 30nm DDR3-RAM, Pioneer DVR-217DBK 22x DVD-RW, Corsair AX850 PSU, Western Digital 2TB SATA3 hard drive, Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic, CanonScan N650U scanner, Microsoft Internet Keyboard, ASDA Wheel Mouse Optical, Sirus's 2 3D speakers, 32inch Sharp LC32LE600 LED TV, EVGA Geforce GTX 670 SC 4GB with Geforce 306.23 driver, 30Mb broadband Virgin Media VMDG480 Super Hub, Aspire Xplorer Midi Tower, Windows 8 Pro 64bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,804
|
Officially its for compatibility reasons, they cant ensure stability with users mixing and matching ATi and NV GPUs, and different combinations of the drivers for each.
And ontop of that running rendering and physics split between theirs and someone elses driver. I would guess there is some truth to that, but I dont think NV is loosing any sleep of it either. I guess they´re hoping that the sales lost from ATi users wanting a NV GPU for physX are made up by ATi users replacing their main card with a NV one or something. As for ATi not supporting PhysX in general, thats simly that they would only strengthen their competitors propriety API, CUDA, if they were to support that, and they really dont stand to gain anything from that. Besides, with Havok coming in with GPU support via OpenCL (which can potentially run on any sort of device, CPU, GPU, CELL, DSP etc), PhysX will prolly have to move over to OpenCL to compete, with that large a target audience OpenCL powered physics middleware would have over a CUDA powered one.
__________________
Q6700, Abit X38 QuadGT, 8Gb (4x 2GB) OCZ Reaper DDR2 1066MHz, Gainward GTX 285 1Gb, X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
RooR
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,500
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() why do people keep making thread's about this?![]()
__________________
Intel Core i5-2500K @4.3 ASUS P8P67 (REV 3.0) msi GTX295 G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB 2 x 4GB 1648 HD1.5tb Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium corsair620HX Windows7 64 home premium Dell LED G2210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 143
|
So it was once possible to use a Nvidia card for Physx with an ATI card? Interesting.
I do understand Nvidia’s decision though. People could simply buy an AMD card and give their previous Nvidia card a second life for Physx instead of buying a new card from them. But maybe having two different cards would have given problems in the long run. It’s too bad though, I’m interested in an AMD card (Really hoping Nvidia will show something soon, they need to convince people to wait a little longer for their cards, including me) and I had been playing with the idea to use my current Nvidia card as a secondary card for Physx. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Its a good decision at this point IMO.
Its obvious that they're doing it on purpose or at least neglecting to make both cards compatible... but can you blame them? ![]() They have a few really nice features going for them that work great on a mid range or last generation GPU. Physx and CUDA. If they allowed those GPUs to work with ATI's, then they would basically be taking away two of their primary selling points for their high end cards. If the 5870 is priced right, anyone could just buy one of those and keep their existing Geforce without losing any features.
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|