|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
|
Wantilles, you're obviously trolling. Stop it please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 678
|
NVIDIA provides distro packagers with a generic installer.
You should use your distro repositories. End of conversation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 138
|
Nonetheless it'd be great if the installer was capable of creating distribution-specific packages for proper integration into package management. I know fglrx is able to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 366
|
I disagree.
NVIDIA should not be package maintainers. That is the job of the people behind distributions. Wha'ts next, every kernel release should have a .deb? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 81
|
I use ubuntu and I'm happy with the way things currently work. If you want something distro native for Debian/Ubuntu, use Envy, otherwise you can choose to use the nvidia install.
What's wrong with Envy? ws |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 64
|
Fully agree with Fackamato.
It's NOT nvidia responsibility to maintain some random distro packages, but distribution maintainers! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
|
Frankly I don't see why so many people disagree to a simple and suggestion. After all, it's nothing more than a suggestion. I am wondering what's the point in disagreeing?
If the Nvidia folks decide to build .deb packages no one is hurt. If not, people have to live with outdated packages (Envy) or may decide not to buy newest hardware because they are simply not willing (or able) to install proper drivers. What's the ugly thing about this? |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 151
|
Ok, here is a question.... how does one go about building a .deb from the nvidia provided package?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 678
|
Actual Fedora releases: Fedora 10, Fedora 11.
Actual Debian Releases: Etch, Lenny Actual Ubuntu Releases: Intrepid Ibex, Jaunty Jackalope and each of these releases have up to 25 kernel releases. Do you really think NVIDIA has resources to make packages for 6*25=150 kernel versions (I'm now speaking only about three popular distributions)? OP suggestion makes no sense. Please, close this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: My own little world
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
I don't think it is as simple as it sounds. That is a rpm/deb for every distro and every kernel they support. There are alot of distros and each distro may have several they a still supporting. As well as updates for kernel revisions. that is a lot of resources that should be used for fixing bugs. I would suspect that it would be a fairly simply task to create a script that does do what you want though. Something that takes the nvidia installer package and extracts it builds the kernel modules and creates a rpm/deb. I personally don't know these steps but google should come up with some good answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
NVIDIA Corporation
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,487
|
Yes, we have no plans to do this for all of the very good reasons given by others in this thread.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|