gtx 285 poor performance???

tornadog · 12-23-09, 07:08 PM

I ran the Batman AA benchmark with the following settings and got:

Max:70,min:24,Avg:46

Settings:1680 x 1050, 4xAA, Physx Very High, Rest all Very High

Is this normal. I am seeing people getting FPS in the 100s with similar specs as in my sig, except for the processor which most have the i7s

**snowmanwithahat** · 12-23-09, 07:11 PM

sounds about right... especially with a dual core

The days of gaming machines with dual-core processors is quickly fading. Even graphically intense games take a hit without having the proper power to feed the card

tornadog · 12-23-09, 07:29 PM

And here I was thinking the i7s are a passing fad :P

BioHazZarD · 12-24-09, 04:50 AM

Its recommended in this game having a separate gfx card if physx toohigh, i think your results are ok for that.

12-24-09, 09:41 AM

What's the matter with your posted fps scores? Sounds pretty good to me.

**Maverick123w** · 12-24-09, 09:56 AM

Same as above, looks fine to me. A dedicated physx card would probably bring up your mins and avg quite a bit.

**Airbrushkid** · 12-24-09, 10:41 AM

Here's what I got with my old set up.

Max:114,min:15,Avg:44

Settings:1920 x 1200, 8xAA, Physx Very High, Rest all Very High

**snowmanwithahat** · 12-24-09, 11:45 AM

Your performance didn't look too far off to be to be honest... Here's the results from my run

Min = 25
Avg = 51
Max = 60

That's with mine at 4x AA though... other than that everything else is identical. It's the physx that really takes a toll on these cards.

12-23-09, 07:08 PM	#1
tornadog Keeper of the Faith Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,446	gtx 285 poor performance??? I ran the Batman AA benchmark with the following settings and got: Max:70,min:24,Avg:46 Settings:1680 x 1050, 4xAA, Physx Very High, Rest all Very High Is this normal. I am seeing people getting FPS in the 100s with similar specs as in my sig, except for the processor which most have the i7s __________________ i7 950 @ 4.2Ghz w/ Venomous-X, Asus Sabertooth x58, 8gb DDR3 GSkill 1600Mhz,MSI N670 PE, Win 7 Ult. x64, Samsung PN50C7000, Pioneer VSX 920-K, Polk Monitor 5.0 Speakers, Bic H100 Sub

12-23-09, 07:11 PM	#2
snowmanwithahat Snowy Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Michigan Posts: 973	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? sounds about right... especially with a dual core The days of gaming machines with dual-core processors is quickly fading. Even graphically intense games take a hit without having the proper power to feed the card __________________ ---Gaming Rig--- Q6600 3.4ghz (378x9) - 1.5v Gigabyte EP45-UD3P 8gb (4x2gb) OCZ Gold DDR2-800 (5-4-4-12) MSI+ASUS GTX 470 SLI Dell u3011 IPS Display HP 22" Auxiliary Monitor 256gb Western Digital Silicon Edge Blue SSD 5x2tb RAID-5 Array 750W PC P&C PSU Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit & Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit ---Gaming Laptop--- ASUS G53JW Core i7 740QM 16gb DDR3 Nvidia GTX 460m 1tb WD HDD 120gb Corsair SSD Join the NvNews Folding @ Home Team

12-23-09, 07:29 PM	#3
tornadog Keeper of the Faith Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,446	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? And here I was thinking the i7s are a passing fad :P __________________ i7 950 @ 4.2Ghz w/ Venomous-X, Asus Sabertooth x58, 8gb DDR3 GSkill 1600Mhz,MSI N670 PE, Win 7 Ult. x64, Samsung PN50C7000, Pioneer VSX 920-K, Polk Monitor 5.0 Speakers, Bic H100 Sub

12-24-09, 04:50 AM	#4
BioHazZarD USCM Marine Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Sweden Posts: 2,369	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? Its recommended in this game having a separate gfx card if physx toohigh, i think your results are ok for that. __________________ Chieftec Miditower /w 5 case fans \| Corsair 620W HX PSU \| Asus M4N98TD EVO SLI \| AMD Athlon2 X2 260 3,2GHz \| Corsair 3GB PC3-10666 \| eVGA Geforce GTX 460 1GB (336shader) \| Samsung Spinpoint x2 250GB HD +SATA 320GB \| SB Audigy 4 @ 2.1 \| Samsung Syncmaster BX2331 TFT 23" running 1920x1080@60hz \| Windows XP PRO SP2 \| \|

12-24-09, 09:41 AM	#5
betterdan Guest Posts: n/a	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? What's the matter with your posted fps scores? Sounds pretty good to me.

12-24-09, 09:56 AM	#6
Maverick123w Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 1,841	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? Same as above, looks fine to me. A dedicated physx card would probably bring up your mins and avg quite a bit.

12-24-09, 10:41 AM	#7
Airbrushkid Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,413	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? Here's what I got with my old set up. Max:114,min:15,Avg:44 Settings:1920 x 1200, 8xAA, Physx Very High, Rest all Very High __________________ Intel Q9550 l eVGA NForce 780i SLI FTW l 2 Palit GTX 560 Ti 2 GB SLI l Corsair Dominator 8 gig PC2-8500 l 2 - Intel X-25M 80 gb SSD Raid 0 l WD 1 -2TB & 2 -1TB l On board sound l Antec TruePower Quattro TPQ-1200 1200W l Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit l 3 X Dell E248WFP 24" Monitors

12-24-09, 11:45 AM	#8
snowmanwithahat Snowy Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Michigan Posts: 973	Re: gtx 285 poor performance??? Your performance didn't look too far off to be to be honest... Here's the results from my run Min = 25 Avg = 51 Max = 60 That's with mine at 4x AA though... other than that everything else is identical. It's the physx that really takes a toll on these cards. __________________ ---Gaming Rig--- Q6600 3.4ghz (378x9) - 1.5v Gigabyte EP45-UD3P 8gb (4x2gb) OCZ Gold DDR2-800 (5-4-4-12) MSI+ASUS GTX 470 SLI Dell u3011 IPS Display HP 22" Auxiliary Monitor 256gb Western Digital Silicon Edge Blue SSD 5x2tb RAID-5 Array 750W PC P&C PSU Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit & Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit ---Gaming Laptop--- ASUS G53JW Core i7 740QM 16gb DDR3 Nvidia GTX 460m 1tb WD HDD 120gb Corsair SSD Join the NvNews Folding @ Home Team