[vdpau] bad usage cpu/fpu/ram ???

[Gillian00]

Hello,

I recently compiled mplayer vdpau and I have this weird error when launching any type of video file. I tried many packages of mplayer-vdpau and xine-vdpau and always the same error:

MPlayer interrupted by signal 11 in module: seek
ID_SIGNAL=11
- MPlayer crashed by bad usage of CPU/FPU/RAM.
Recompile MPlayer with --enable-debug and make a 'gdb' backtrace and
disassembly. Details in DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports_what.html#bugreports_crash.
- MPlayer crashed. This shouldn't happen.
It can be a bug in the MPlayer code _or_ in your drivers _or_ in your
gcc version. If you think it's MPlayer's fault, please read
DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports.html and follow the instructions there. We can't and
won't help unless you provide this information when reporting a possible bug.

driver: 195.30
gcc: 4.4.2

Could you help me ?

[cehoyos]

Originally Posted by Gillian00

Could you help me ?

You could:

• Confirm that you did svn up && make distclean && ./configure && make
• Test vdpinfo and qvdpautest
• Post your command line and complete, uncut output of mplayer
• Test software decoding and other vo's
• Read the text you posted and act accordingly

Carl Eugen

[Gillian00]

I installed the mplayer-vdpau version from the "official" Archlinux packages in aur which works well.
I also installed libvdpau ffmpeg-vdpau libva-sds vdpau-video

vdpinfo gives me :

$ vdpinfo
display: :0.0 screen: 0
Error creating VDPAU device: 1

qvdpautest says:

The following error occured: Can't create vdp device : No vdpau implementation

with which command can I give you this ?

Post your command line and complete, uncut output of mplayer

Test software decoding and other vo's

xv, opengl and other decoding works well


what does mean a "make a 'gdb' backtrace and
disassembly." ??


recompile is loading . .



sorry for my bad english !

[Stephen Warren]

Please run the following command before running vdpinfo:

export VDPAU_NVIDIA_DEBUG=3

Then post everything that vdpinfo prints out.

Also, please generate an nvidia bug report; see the stick posts for details. Thanks.

[Gillian00]

vdpinfo:

display: :0.0 screen: 0
VDPAU nvidia: Version: NVIDIA VDPAU Driver Shared Library 190.42 Tue Oct 20 21:20:26 PDT 2009
VDPAU nvidia: Error detected 0 5525
VDPAU nvidia: Backtrace:
--: /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so [0x7fa978f38000] DSO load base
00: /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so [0x7fa978f3ddb8] vdp_imp_device_create_x11
Error creating VDPAU device: 1

Is i normal that library is 190.42 ? I'm running with 195.30 and all libraries are installed


nvidia bug report :

____________________________________________

Start of NVIDIA bug report log file. Please include this file
when reporting a graphics driver bug via the nV News NVIDIA
Linux forum (see www.nvnews.net) or by sending email to
'linux-bugs@nvidia.com'.

nvidia-bug-report.sh Version: 4401218

Date: lun jan 11 12:45:52 CET 2010
uname: Linux oztracker 2.6.32-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jan 7 22:28:29 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5550 @ 1.83GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

thank you for your help

[Stephen Warren]

Originally Posted by Gillian00

Is i normal that library is 190.42 ? I'm running with 195.30 and all libraries are installed

No, your driver is somehow incorrectly installed. Did you install using a distribution package, or using NVIDIA's ".run" installer? Either way, I suggest uninstalling the NVIDIA driver completely and re-installing.

[Gillian00]

I didn't installed the .run but the nvidia-beta package from repo. . .

I already tried to re-install and it doesn't work

[Stephen Warren]

You'll probably need to talk to whoever created that packaged version of the NVIDIA driver then.

However, could you also run the command below. I imagine it'll indicate that either multiple libvdpau_nvidia.so are installed, or that the wrong one is:

ls -l /{usr/{local/,},}lib*/{vdpau/,}libvdpau_nvidia*

Thanks.

[Gillian00]

r ~]$ ls -l /{usr/{local/,},}lib*/{vdpau/,}libvdpau_nvidia*
ls: ne peut accéder /usr/local/lib*/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia*: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
ls: ne peut accéder /usr/local/lib*/libvdpau_nvidia*: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
ls: ne peut accéder /lib*/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia*: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
ls: ne peut accéder /lib*/libvdpau_nvidia*: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 déc 29 21:00 /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.190.42
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1458184 nov 14 15:41 /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so.190.42
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 déc 31 14:24 /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 -> libvdpau_nvidia.so.195.30
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1636512 déc 31 14:24 /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.195.30

So I have all libraries with 190 and 195 ?? How to remove them if the 190 is already uninstalled ?


Thank you for your help :-)

[Stephen Warren]

You can probably get things working by:

rm -f /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so.190.42

However, you should try and find out where those files came from, so that you can a) uninstall any conflicting packages b) make sure they don't come back, and/or c) file a bug against the package.

The most likely possibilities are: a) You previously installed 190.42 using NVIDIA's ".run" file, and didn't uninstall it using NVIDIA's installer before installing the 195 drivers using the package. In this case, just delete the 190.42 files and be done with it. b) You previously installed 190.42 using a package, but the upgrade to the 195 package didn't remove the (or all of the) 190.42 package. if so, you should report a bug to the maintainer(s) of both packages.

[P.Kosunen]

Originally Posted by Gillian00

How to remove them if the 190 is already uninstalled ?

rm /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so.190.42
ln -s /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so.195.30 /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so

[Gillian00]

I choose the option b) because I never installed .run driver ^^

Is there a command to find every file of 190.42 driver like the one you gave me but for all package ?

however, always the same error. . . Do I have to recompile mplayer ? Maybe is it better to do it without any 190.42 file ?