|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Near Bude, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,291
|
I have no problem with the sig rules as per say, i like the fact that sig pics aren't allowed to be that big, but 19.5KB is pretty severe. I thought the limit was a bit ironic considering the forum has a pretty huge amount of picture threads and a reasonable amount of space for attachments.
Could the KB limit be upped to something more managable like 35 or something. Pretty please, my sig pic looks horribly compressed. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Mine looks fine.
/thread. |
||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Near Bude, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,291
|
Thanks Crainger.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Better than a dogs breakfast and likely to annoy everyone. Sig pics along with animated avatars were a hotly debated topic, they are only allowed if they are as small and unobtrusive as possible.
Anyway, ragejg made my sig. Why do you hate him so much? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,997
|
my sig is 9k.
__________________
• EVGA GeForce GTX 680 • PCP&C 750 Quad • ASUS 12x BD-ROM • DELL U2412M E-IPS • Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 • Logitech Z5500 5.1 • |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,831
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Near Bude, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,291
|
This is what i mean.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
|
If you size/compress it correctly you should easily be below the 19.5KB.
If you increase the size to 35KB, then you're practically double the loading time on pages with all text (e.g. in P&R). Then again pretty much everyone's avatars are cached by the browser. To be honest, I don't care either way. I have >15Mbit everywhere I go anyway lol. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Near Bude, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,291
|
Well to get round the problem i tried uploading several different higher resolution versions and just lettng the uploader get on with it with the auto compressor they've got going on.
I used the one with the best result. And vin, don't give me the "it will take twice as long to display the page" malarky because it just doesn't cut the mustard when there are so many picture of ridunculous size threads dotted around the place. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,467
|
I just discovered this part of forum. Feedback?! Never been here
![]() This is awesome here. I see its easy to make jokes from Craniger here! |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|