|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 35,592
|
Metro 2033 was looking as highly considerable title ' post-apocalyptic setting, intense focus on atmosphere and storyline, state-of-the-art graphics engine with DX 11 support, and of course, solid implementation of PhysX SDK based physics.
And after finishing it we can say ' Metro 2033 is pretty good game for sure. But following the direction of our site, will leave other game aspects to reviewers and focuse on in-game physics implementation, and 'Advanced PhysX' mode particularly. Overall physics level is looking pretty decent, but anticipated 'Advanced PhysX' option may be dissapointing ' it's adds only several hardly-noticeable particle effects (we already saw numerous discussions with same idea 'what is Advanced PhysX doing ? I can't notice anything ' is it working ?'). Surprisingly, but destructible physics objects, particle effects in key scenes and even cloth banners aren't affected by 'Advanced PhysX' switch. Moreover, additional PhysX content is even somehow optimized for multi-core CPU execution (will use it if Nvidia GPU is not present in the system). Of course, intense firefight with a lot of impact debris particles or several smoke clouds from grenade explosions will result in heavy fps drop (while running all calculations on CPU), but situation is better than in previous GPU PhysX games. For example, that's how CPU load is looking while defending the barricade at the end of the Chapter 3 (this scene has lot of impact particles), with Advanced PhysX content running on CPU. Final Sum: additional PhysX content in Metro 2033 is not nearly so intensive and defiant as in previous GPU PhysX games ' one can call it mediocre, other will say it fit in game environment more naturally. But from what we heard, there may be PhysX patch for Metro 2033 ' no additional details were revealed yet.As always, GPU PhysX Info mini-site for Metro 2033 is located here More... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Looks pretty good.
Definitely a game I'll be saving for GF100. ![]()
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
.<<o>>.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,763
|
Why are they wasting the possibilities of PhysX on crap like this? PhysX could revolutionize gaming as we know it, but as long as nvidia keeps it to themselves it's never gonna happen.
__________________
: :Benq FP241W : : Optoma HD80 Projector + 92" Screen : : Genelec 8020B speakers : : Sony MDR-XB700 Headphones : : Razer Lycosa : : Razer Lachesis : : |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
L4D & DoW2 ftw!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,143
|
Quote:
Proprietary physics won't get us anywhere really interesting.
__________________
---MAIN GAMING RIG from MID SEPTEMBER 2007, MOBO+CASE+FANS UPGRADED APRIL 2009, GRAPHICSCARD UPGRADED MARCH 2010--- Case: Antec P182 case + 3x 120mm Scythe Slipstream SY1225SL12M @ ~900 RPM Motherboard: Asus P5Q Deluxe CPU: Intel Core2 Q6600@3.3ghz w. Noctua NH-U12P RAM: 4Gb Crucial Tracer PC-8500 Graphics: XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition Harddiscs: 2xRaptorX 150gb 10.000 RPM in RAID0 Soundcard: X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Sound: Sennheiser HD600 Headphones + headamp Keyboard: Logitech DiNovo Edge Mouse: Razor Orochi Monitor: Samsung 2232BW (22" 1680*1050) OS: Windows 7 Professional 64bit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,866
|
Huh? ATI/AMD had and have a chance to jump on PhysX, but nooo they wanted to do their thing with Havok which became typical vaporware.
__________________
Intel I7-920 aircooled by Prolimatech Megahalems @ 3.8Ghz (200x19) | Gigabyte GA-X58-UD3R | OCZ Platinum 3x2GB DDR3-1600 RAM (7-7-7-24) @ 1600 | Gainward GTX 480 | WD Raptor 74GB + 150GB + Samsung 1TB | Soundblaster X-Fi Platinum | Corsair AX850 Gold | Coolermaster Stacker 830 silver | Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 | Logitech G15 keyboard | Logitech G25 Racing Wheel | Sharp LC-46 XL1E (gaming and work) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
.<<o>>.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,763
|
Don't think AMD ever really got a proper offer from nvidia. Besides it would have forced ATI into cuda and so forth. Don't think ati would have turned down PhysX if it had been offered.
__________________
: :Benq FP241W : : Optoma HD80 Projector + 92" Screen : : Genelec 8020B speakers : : Sony MDR-XB700 Headphones : : Razer Lycosa : : Razer Lachesis : : |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|