|
|
#229 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,993
|
I thought this game was mostly CPU limited?
__________________
Vista64 Home Premium Gigabyte GA-EP35C-DS3R CPU E8500 with Corsair H50 cooler HIS 6970, always 19x10res Memory 8 Gig OCZ 1000@1024 Display Westinghouse 37" LVM-37w1 LCD monitor |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 1,041
|
Well, 4GHz i7 should be enough
![]() But it can also benefit from a bigger framebuffer I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.
Posts: 6,701
|
Quote:
![]() 5870 has the headroom because it runs much cooler. Guys routinely hit 1000MHz on the core. It would be interesting to see an OC'ng comparison between 5870/480, for sure. Has anyone found one yet?
__________________
i7-2700k @ 5.0 GHz Nvidia GeForce 570 2.5GB Tri-SLI Asus P67 WS Revolution (Tri-SLI) OCZ Vertex SSD x 4 (Raid 5) G.Skill 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz PC Power & Cooling 950W PSU |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 | |
|
CUBE
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 18,844
|
Quote:
If there is a need for dual GPUs then there is certainly a need for overclocking high end GPUs for free performance. I see no reason for this not to be covered more thoroughly. Firingsquad had some overclocked 470 and 480 benchmarks that showed 15-20% improvement in performance, but it seemed like something was off with a lot of their results so I'm taking that with a grain of salt. I'd be overclocking a 480 if I bought one... but if the heat output is already as bad as it is, I don't know how its even possible to overclock.
__________________
6GB DDR2 @ 942Mhz 5-5-5-20 1.9v (2x1Gb Wintec AMPX PC2-8500 & 2x2Gb G.Skill PC2-6400) - EVGA Geforce GTX 470 @ 750/1500/1850 (1.050v) Sparkle Geforce GTS 250 1Gb Low-Profile (Physx) - Crucial RealSSD C300 64Gb SSD - Seagate 7200.12 500Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA ASUS VW266H 25.5" LCD - OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU - ASUS Xonar DX - Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround - Windows 7 Professional x64 ---- HTPC ---- Asus M3A78-EM 780G - AMD Athlon X2 5050e 45W @ 2.6Ghz - 2x2GB Kingston PC2-6400 DDR2 - Sparkle 350W PSU Seagate 7200.10 320Gb SATA - Seagate 7200.10 250Gb SATA - Athenatech A100BB.350 MicroATX Desktop - Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic |
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.
Posts: 6,701
|
Quote:
From just a quick glance, it looks like 480 scales better when OC'ng. Two things I wonder, though-- 1 - Will you be able to overclock long-term with 480 safely because of temps 2 - Could they have gone even higher on 5870 than they did. I've seen some guys hit 1050 on the core stable, and ATI allows software volt-modding to increase voltage for higher overclocks. Nvidia doesn't do this, to my knowledge. But, nice results/testing.
__________________
i7-2700k @ 5.0 GHz Nvidia GeForce 570 2.5GB Tri-SLI Asus P67 WS Revolution (Tri-SLI) OCZ Vertex SSD x 4 (Raid 5) G.Skill 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz PC Power & Cooling 950W PSU |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 1,041
|
I don't know, I think they were promising voltage changes a while back, but I'm not sure it would be a great idea
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
With how hot the 480 already runs, I'd not oc it. But I do see something promising here- how well it scales when oc'd. I imagine we might be impressed by the refresh or the next gen part. I think this is not a repeat of the FX5800, but is instead nVidia's very own 2900XT. If it weren't for the 2900, ATi would not have the success they now are enjoying.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
|
ATI really could just clock the parts faster and just call it a day if they haven't already.
Wish we had some power consumption figures for the OC cards in that hwguru review though. |
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 66
|
This have been bugging for a while. Do those new GTX470/480 have hardware VRM protection to prevent overdraw like the 5870s?
Last edited by wishiknew; 03-28-10 at 12:01 PM. Reason: fixed spelling |
|
|
|
|
#239 | |
|
Passing you @ 192mph
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada, EH!
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
As far as people saying that the cards are using release drivers.....remember that chips have supposedly been available since last sept. so they've had lots of time to work on drivers. I'm hoping that we'll see some improvements but again they've had 8 months with the silicon to work on release drivers....
__________________
Phenom II 965BE @ 3.9ghz 200X19.5 1.4625 vcore 2.8ghz NB 2.4ghz HT - Asus M4A79XTD-EVO bios 0604 - 12GB Corsair DDR3 1600 @ 1600mhz CAS 9 w/1T - XFX 6970 2GB 950/1450 - Xigmatek S1283 HSF - Antec 900 - Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
Sayonara !!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 9,297
|
I guess that semi-accurate guy was more accurate than Nvidia and it's paid forum "news" posters
![]() That being said, this card on a smaller process with all sm's active should be quite a beast ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|