Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

View Poll Results: How important is 3dmark to you?
Very important 1 5.00%
Somewhat important 9 45.00%
Not at all important 10 50.00%
No opinion 0 0%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Old 07-18-03, 07:57 AM   #1
Apple user. Deal with it.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,504
Default 3dmark opinion thread

I want to gauge how everyone feels about 3dmark as a program, benchmarking tool, etc. Is the program and its results important to you? Think about when you read video card reviews and run tests on your own system when you answer this question.

Vote here.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 08:20 AM   #2
The Baron
Posts: n/a

As a 3D demo, it looks nifty. Cool way to show off your new computer to people when there are no games that support your Uber Video Cards yet.

As a stress testing program, it's iffy. I think a looped UT2003 bench at max AA/AF would be more effective at causing artifacts on an OC'd card.

As a benchmarking tool? HAH. Useless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 09:18 AM   #3
digitalwanderer's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 4,944
Default Which one?

I still love 3dm2k1se for system stability testing and to compare me system pre-upgrade to post-upgrade, it's about the best all-around system tester I know for D3D.

I don't like 3dm2k3 so much since it is just so graphic card intensive that it pretty much ignores the rest of the system, I wish it would be just a bit more holistic in it's system measurements.

3dm2k is still the nut-buster for me to see if an OC is good, if it can make it thru Helicopter high-detail it can make it thru just about anything....it's also great for testing older systems out with. (I build a lot of cheap web-cruisers/kid gamer systems for families that don't have PCs, my way of giving back I guess and keeping too many old parts from clogging up my basement/garage...plus it might be a cheap old PC put together from spare bits but to a 3-5 year old it is a top-o-the-line wonderbox! )

So I guess I like 'em, but not 3dm2k3 so much 'cept for the fact that it's brought the whole "optimization" issue to light....I owe it a nod for that if nothing else.
[SIZE=1][I]"It was very important to us that NVIDIA did not know exactly where to aim. As a result they seem to have over-engineered in some aspects creating a power-hungry monster which is going to be very expensive for them to manufacture. We have a beautifully balanced piece of hardware that beats them on pure performance, cost, scalability, future mobile relevance, etc. That's all because they didn't know what to aim at."
-R.Huddy[/I] [/SIZE]
digitalwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 09:30 AM   #4
Elite Bastard
Hanners's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984

Depends what I'm using it for.

To gauge the ability of a video card to perform a particular feature or function, it's okay. To compare video cards alone (pretty much forgetting the rest of the system) in a completely synthetic scenario, then it's great. To work out how fast your machine will run UT2003/Doom III etc, it's a load of rubbish.

Assuming you mean 3DMark 2003 that is, although the same rules more or less apply to 3DMark2001.
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards
Hanners is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 01:34 PM   #5
Apple user. Deal with it.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The 'burbs, IL USA
Posts: 12,504

I'm primarily thinking about 3dmark 2001 here. The only time I ever use it is to test OC stability on my video cards. Other than that, the program is of no importance to me whatsoever and is never a deciding factor when I'm purchasing a video card.
saturnotaku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 08:38 PM   #6
Posts: n/a

The GTs of 3dmark are rather useless except to ascertain the effectiveness of tweaking, or perform system stability via loops.

The synthetic tests can be useful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-03, 09:17 PM   #7
b00bie's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: where I always been
Posts: 203
Send a message via ICQ to b00bie Send a message via AIM to b00bie
Post not that much....

When I look at the reviews of the cards, I look more at the benchmarks from the games rather than 3dmark2k1 or 2k3. If I'm looking for a new card, I want it to play my games the way I want them (maxed out ). I know that these scores for some people are just everything. If you don't have a good score on 3dmark2k1, your card sux0rz
So to answer your question, I don't give a damn about the 3dmark scores at all other than to see the oc results.
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool

My baby: Vaio SZ4VWN || Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 (2.16 GHz) || 2GB RAM || NVIDIA GEFORCE GO 7400 || 160GB HDD || Vista Business
My desktop: AMD Athlon 64 X2 || 2GB RAM || SAPPHIRE Radeon X1950PRO || 200GB HDD || XP Prof. SP2
Other: Not even worth mentioning...
b00bie is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Firefall Beta Thread Roadhog Gaming Central 62 05-15-12 12:25 PM
Thread deletion. PCarr78 Feedback Forum 9 09-23-02 08:25 PM
Need a RavenShield thread Smokey Gaming Central 12 08-30-02 03:39 PM
Official Grand Theft Auto 3 thread volt Gaming Central 6 08-01-02 07:04 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.