|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
I'm disappointed with the performance so far.
Specs: CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 RAM: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 @ 1333MHz GPU: GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 460 1GB OC Edition (using 258.96) OS: Windows 7 Home Premium x64. PSU: Thermaltake TR2 TRX-750M 750W Modular. Installation, etc... Went incredible smooth. Everything was going just according to plan, but then when I fired up Battlefield Bad Company 2, I was somewhat disappointed with the performance I was getting from this card (Everything HIGH, AA at x2, AF at x16, VSync ON, HBAO off @ 1600 x 900). I mean, It's very playable don't get me wrong, but I was expecting A LOT more from this card, In fact, I was getting smoother gameplay from my old Radeon HD 5770 in this game, which is nowhere near the GTX 460 according to every single benchmark out there. Now, Is there something I'm missing? Is there something I haven't done? like enabling or disabling settings in the NVIDIA control panel? (this is my 1st time using an NVIDIA card since the days of the Geforce TI 4600). Please reply soon!. Thanks in advanced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
not sure, but wait for the more seasoned veterans to give their thoughts.
You should be getting close to twice the fps of the 5770 if i understand correctly.... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Now, to be honest, I wasn't expecting TWICE the FPS of the 5770 since I game with VSYNC ON, but I was expecting much smoother gameplay (especially with AA enabled). In fact, according to bit-tech.net, the GTX 460's min FPS in BFBC2 is actually higher than the avg FPS of the HD 5770 (when AA is enabled) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Very rarely, maybe once every 10ish or so mp rounds, I get stuttering for like a couple seconds, and then everything goes back to normal. It's a tiny issue, but I think has to do with the game.
Metro 2033 and STALKER ran great. Do you have any other games to try? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
I'm gonna try with Crysis, GTA and a couple more later on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
|
I ran some BC2 yesterday and I know what you mean - performance just wasn't that great. My CPU might be getting in the way though. We'll see how things go when I hook up my new 1920x1080 display.
__________________
PC - | Core i7-2600K @ stock | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3 | 4GB Patriot Sector 5 DDR3 | Galaxy GTX 460 1GB @ stock | Corsair Force 120GB SSD | Seagate 1TB 7200RPM | 320GB Seagate 7200.10 | 2x Seagate 500GB USB 2.0 | Lite-On 20x SATA DVD+RW | Silverstone TJ-09 | Corsair 620W PSU | Logitech Z-5500s | Sennheiser HD-570 headphones | Samsung 2494LW | Laptop - | Dell Inspiron 1420 | C2D T7300 (2.0GHz, 4MB cache) | 2GB DDR2-667 | 160GB 7200RPM HDD | DVD +/- RW | 14.1" WXGA+ (1440x900) | Broadcom 802.11g | NVIDIA 8400M GS 128MB | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
It's a wittle baby!
|
Remember, BC2 loves Quad Cores. If you don't have one, don't expect any GPU to achieve a constant 60fps at any level.
__________________
MadPistol's Rig AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (RB-C3) @ 4Ghz, 1.425 Vcore, 1.25V NB VID Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan) Gigabyte UD3H AM3 790GX motherboard XFX Radeon HD 5870 PNY XLR8 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600 G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600 Soundblaster X-Fi Fatality Titanium OCZ Vertex II 120GB SSD (OS drive) Western Digital 500GB Caviar (black) Western Digital 640GB Blue Samsung DVD burner Logitech MX performance mouse Logitech G15 keyboard Corsair HX 750-watt Modular PSU Antec Nine Hundred case Windows 7 Home Premium x64 ASUS MK241 24" LCD ACER X241W 24" LCD - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ducking & Dodging
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,948
|
I was complaining about this before and basically everyone told me it was me making it up. Now there are threads on EVGA forums about this, Nvidia forums, BF BC2 forums. Its not the speed, its the smoothness of the gameplay experience.
Its funny how many threads have popped up about this. Oh well, I was first. EDIT: The developer 259.09 seems to run BF BC2 better. Try them out! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
nV News Alumni
|
To put it into perspective, the HD 5770 (especially if overclocked) mostly keeps up with HD 5830 in a lot of scenarios, especially at medium resolutions and with medium amounts of AA and AF. And, HD 5830 is about equal with GTX 460 and 465 in most scenarios.
Plus you have the factor of all the "cool" reviews out there sing uber-powerful CPUs with zero CPU limitation going on, allowing the cards to run as wild as they want to. Hey that's cool but does not reflect what most people have, which is rigs more like yours. With a reasonable amount of CPU limitation (using an I5 or 4 core Phenom around 3.2, or 3-core around 3.5) these cards perform even closer, which should be a better known-fact. You shouldn't have gone from HD 5770 to GTX 460. If you'd have gotten a 470 it'd be a different story for you. You should have researched a little deeper.
__________________
2010-2011 Reviews: GTX 570 | GTX 580 | GTS 450 | GTX 460 | GTX 465 Pre-2010 Reviews: 6600 GT | XMS 4400 DDR | SilenX Cooler | 6800 | 5900 XT | Personal Cinema | 5900 NU ______________________________________________ Phenom II x6 1090t @ 4.0 ghz | Asus M498TD-EVO Am3 SLI nForce 980a | 2x EVGA GTX 560 SLI | 2x4gb DDR3-1333 | Antec EarthWatts EA650 PSU | 60gb Mushkin Calisto Enhanced Sandforce SSD | 2x WD2500KS RAID 0 | Sunbeam Tuniq 3 case | 24" Asus 19x10 LED LCD | 26" Panasonic 720p TV | Sidewinder X5 mouse | Logitech MX5500 & Revolution mouse | Altec Lansing 5.1 THX-Certified audio | Win 7 Ultimate | desk | couch |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
I was getting smoother gameplay with my old HD 5770, not similar, but smoother, much smoother. The only thing that made made the game a little more playable, was setting the DXMode to 10, which IMO is pretty lame. And it's happening to A LOT of GTX 400 series users out there, just check the EVGA, BFBC2 forums. EDIT: Apparently NVIDIA has reproduced the BFBC2 stutter: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: GREENVILLE,TX
Posts: 3,851
|
The HD5770 is a strong middle range card and the HD5770 does play other games better then the GTX 460,and the GTX 460 plays other games better then the HD5770 .To me the GTX 460 and the HD5770 are about equal in performance .The HD5770 plays some games better and other games the GTX 460 plays better.It could be a driver problem or the HD 5770 plays that game engine better.Does the GTX 460 play all of your other games alright.
__________________
Intel i7-3820+Corsair H-100+ASROCK X79-Extreme4+16gigs G.Skill PC1600DDR3+2-ASUS DirectCU II GTX-670 in SLI+Crucial 256g-SSD+2- Samsung 1-TB+2-WesternDigtial 640g+LG-12x Blu-Ray Burner+1100w CoolerMaster+Antec-P280 case+50" Plasma PM6700+Logitech Mouse+Keyboard+Pioneer VSX-1020+Polk Audio Speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Has a vegetation fetish
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,816
|
From my quick searching on the hd 5770, the increase in performance is only a little, and really not worth plunking down money on. For starters, the 5770 is a dx11 card. Frankly if you bought a midrange dx11 card, you shouldn't be looking at another mid range dx11 card for maybe 2 years. Any upgrades you should consider is either to a high end card, or go SLI.
__________________
_________________________________________________ Mobo: EVGA 122-ck-nf68 680i sli, CPU: C2D Quad 6600, Video: EVGA GTX 460 1gb SC, Sound: X-fi gaming, Windows 7, Antec P180b,Thermalright Ultra-120 HSF, Antec TruPower TP3-650, 4 Gigs RAM |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|