Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > CPUs, Motherboards And Memory

Newegg Daily Deals

Thread Tools
Old 09-15-10, 08:42 PM   #1
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 18
Default Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

hey guys!

So I was wondering if I could get some help here. Currently I have this set up

q9550 2.83ghz core 2 quad
GTX 460 1gb
4gig DDR2 ram
Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR
windows 7 ultimate 64bit
700watt PSU
LG 1920x1080 monitor

I get really good performance. But what enthusiast doesn't like to have more power? haha. So I have been thinking of getting an i7 system. Of course this means I would need to get a new motherboard and new ram which gets expensive ( I would sell the q9550, mobo and ram to help make up some of the cost ). But my question is this...

Would I notice a huge increase in performance with the i7? I am an audio professional, so I do a lot of music recording, writing and mixing, plus I am a huge gamer and play a ton of games. So I am looking to get as much power as I can, but if upgrading compared to the cost of upgrading is not worth it, then I won't do it.


PS: I have not overclocked, not really my thing and don't know much on how to do it.
billmaudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-10, 09:08 PM   #2
Mahna Mahna
jcrox's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Madison, Wi
Posts: 6,135
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

Save yourself a bunch of money and Google overclocking. There are plenty of tutorials out there. At 3.2GHz my Q9400 handled my GTX470 just as well as my i7. I really haven't noticed any difference in gaming since the switch.


MSI MPower Z87 | 4770k | CNPS9900MAX-B | 8GB G.Skill 1866 | EVGA GTX760 |ThermalTake 850w | X-Fi Titanium | HAF | Asus PA248Q | Lycosa | Death Adder | Win8 Pro 64


MSI GD65 | 2500k | H50 | 8GB G.skill | GTX570 | Ubuntu 13.10


17" Inspiron | i5 | 4GB DDR3 | 500GB HDD | Win7 Pro 64

jcrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-10, 09:27 PM   #3
bob saget
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver, originally Russia
Posts: 23,138
Send a message via MSN to bob saget Send a message via Yahoo to bob saget
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

definitely stick with the Q9550, it is a great CPU even after all this time. since you have a gigabyte motherboard, for overclocking, post a thread here, in the gigabyte section, and people will walk you through it. : http://forums.tweaktown.com/
bob saget is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-10, 09:32 PM   #4
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

I don't see myself getting rid of my Q9550 for a couple years at least.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-10, 09:54 PM   #5
Posts: n/a

If you decide to upgrade and not overclock, wait for Sandy Bridge next year. IMO, worth waiting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-10, 12:40 AM   #6
Registered User of Women
Viral's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

I've decided to wait. Try overclocking if the games you play feel like they need it or if you're itching to get that audio encoding done faster.. if not, don't bother just yet. Stability will be very important for you when overclocking, but most Q9550's will make 3.2GHz without any complaint, so that should be a decent speed bump.
Q9550 w/ Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme | 4GB Team Xtreme Dark 800MHz CL4 | Gigabyte X48-DS5
ASUS Radeon 5870 | 240GB OCZ Vertex 2 | 1TB WD Green Power | BenQ V2400W 24" LCD
Corsair HX-1000w | LG GGW-H20L 6x DL Blu-Ray Burner/HD-DVD Reader | Coolermaster Cosmos S

Acer TravelMate 4002WNLCi: Pentium M 725 @ 1.6GHz | Mobility Radeon 9700/64MB | 2GB DDR400 | 15.4" WXGA
Viral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-10, 08:50 AM   #7
Ducking & Dodging
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,948
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

I went from a 4.1Ghz Q9550 to 4.2Ghz i7 860. Not worth it. Only reason I did it was after I sold my parts it only cost me $40. However, I did go from 8GB ram to 4GB. Didn't notice a difference though with less ram, overall system is not any noticabley faster. Benchmarks says it is, but wasnt worth the effort tbh. Stick with the 9550, get a nice cooler and overclock it. You'll be goo0d for awhile.
i7-2600k @ 4.6Ghz, Zotac GTX 680 (1310/7000), 16GB DDR3 1600, 2 x 1TB Samsung F3 RAID 0, Windows 7 x64, CPU and GPU custom watercooled

Originally Posted by General Lee View Post
Oh, if the whole world had only one neck for me to squeeze in my hands...
mailman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-10, 10:29 AM   #8
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 198
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

I'm doing the exact same thing... Bought the Q9650 and OCed it to 4Ghz while using the Cosair H50 with a two fan config. Fantastic cooling and a very good quad core. Sure the i7s have multi threading support and clock per clock they are faster but there isn't much out there pushing multithreading. If you're running something very high end work station fine but not games. I think the last article I read at the most games are pushing 3 cores. NOTHING is pushing 4-6 cores. It's going to take some time.

I'm going to milk my current setup until the SB Es come out and consider the upgrade then. The problem I see is this constant change in Sockets forces new MBs and Memory upgrades. Skip this Gen and look at the next. You're in good shape with that CPU.
Scendore is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-16-10, 01:18 PM   #9
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,015
Send a message via MSN to WeReWoLf
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

I'm upgrading from my Q9550 to an I7 870 for the moment, mainly because I'm moving into Multi-threaded application processing. Will be upgrading again when Sandy Bridge EE come into existance. Mainly doing the I7 route because this 780i just isn't cutting it for me anymore. 3.74Ghz is the Max stable clock I can get out of it without increasing the FSB voltage to 1.4, and @ 1.4v FSB it tops out at 3.9Ghz.
WeReWoLf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-10, 01:52 PM   #10
XDanger's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,729
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

spend the money on op amps or speakers or something or a jaunty hat.

I think an SSD would give me more benefit than an i7 system change would, Not that I can afford either.
2500K 4.7ghz,P8P67Pro,120gb Force3, 8gb Vengeance,GTX970,TX850v2,W7HP,LaCie Blue 22" crt COMMODORE 64 Silver Label 1Mhz/128D 4Mhz(Z80)
XDanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-10, 08:38 AM   #11
hirantha's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY, Staten Island
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

Best chip i ever had!!! QX9650, not gonna change for another year!
Intel i7 3770K
16 GB DDR3
Evga 670 SLI

Look me up in AION and GW2
Game Tag: Famorak
hirantha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-10, 10:25 AM   #12
lol wut?
Aphot's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 753
Send a message via AIM to Aphot Send a message via MSN to Aphot
Default Re: Q9550 vs i7 big enough difference?

When I went from Q9550 at 3.2 GHz to i7 920 at 4.0 GHz it was quite a bit of difference.
Intel I7 920 4.0GHz (Noctua NH-D14)
Asus P6X58D Premium
6GB G.Skill PC12800 (2GB x 3)
2 HIS HD6970's in Crossfire
Western Digital;
2 Velociraptor 300GB in Raid 0
2 Caviar Black 1.0TB
Asus Xonar Essence STX
Denon PRA-1000 , POA-1500
Celestion Ditton 442's
Corsair HX 1050
Antec P183
Dell U2410
Sennheiser HD 555
Razer Deathadder / Razer Lycosa
Aphot is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.