|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
|
For a NV-GTX295 on WIN-7X64?
__________________
clayp Core 2 Duo X6800 Extreame @3.24 evga Motherboard OCZ 2Gig 15-5-5-5 memory kit DDR2 OCZ2N1066SR2GK 2 x 2 gig kits (4 gigs total) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Western Digital 160gig sata II 16mb Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer SB0730VP Cooler master CM Stacker 830 Silver OCZ Gamer extreme PS 1010wat OCZ1010GXSSLI Samsung Optical (DVD/CDRW) Windows 7X64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 633
|
Personally, I like 186.18. It seems to have the least problems and fixed aspect ratio scaling works best for me, though I do have to add a couple custom resolutions like 1440x900 and 1400x1050. Most of the newer ones completely break fixed aspect ratio for me and all I can get is a stretched screen when not in 16:10.
That said, for newer ones, the 258.96 set seems to work well too, but the 260 beta breaks scaling completely. I have a single card and don't use the stereoscopic 3d or whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2,057
|
I used 186.18 for a long time before I got a GTX 480, now I use the 258.96's and they seem OK. The card I had before was a GTX 285.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 267
|
I tried the 186.18 driver but it created explosion artifacts playing BFBC2. I am now trying the 197.57 Beta, the last driver before the 260 drivers came out. Can anyone tell me that last driver that had no support for the 400 series cards? I think sveral sets before the 256 drivers had support fot the 400 series cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
007
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: You were sayin'
Posts: 290
|
try 197.45, i've seen a few that said they're the best 295gtx atm.
You can also try 3d vison driver that came with 1.34 cd; its 259.32, it was the fastest from all 25x.xx series in win7 64bit.. btw, 400 series started with 197.41
__________________
intel Q9450 @ 3.656Ghz [1.3875v, LLC off]| GA-X48-DS5 [Memory Enhance: Turbo]|MSi N570GTX TwinFrozrIII OC/PowerEdition|Kingston HyperX 4x2GB PC 8500 @ 1097Mhz [5-5-5-18, 2.25v]| Creative X-FI Pro [SB046A]| Tagan PipeRock 600w [48A] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 93
|
After what I've experienced, I'd avoid anything newer than 197.45 if using a 200 series card.
__________________
Rigs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 799
|
Why, what have you experienced?
I've got 2 GTX280's in SLI and a GT240 as PhysX on win7 64 bit and wild horses stampeding could not convince me to go back to 197.45 from 260.99
__________________
Primary rig: CPU: Intel i7 2600K Cooler: Cooler MAster Hyper 212+ Motherboard Asrock z68 Extreme 4 Memory: 8gb Corsair DDR-3 1333 Video: 2x Galaxy GTX 670 reference 2gb PhysX: Gainward GTX 460 SE 1gb Video Capture: Compro E-700 DVB-T PCI-e PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W Monitor: Samsung 305T 30" Case: Coolermaster stacker 830 Hard drives: 5x 500gb seagate SATA (non raid) Burner: Samsung SH-S18L OS: Vista Ultimate 64 bit and Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit MS Sidewinder Joystick Logitech G25 wheel Logitech 5.1 speaker system |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|