|
|
#37 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Mahna Mahna
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Madison, Wi
Posts: 6,123
|
Quote:
They're both great cards. Each has advantages and disadvantages when compared to the other. Neither one is any more "future proof" than the other. I just got my 2 570s today... I've never owned an ATI card much less the one in question so I can't personally comment on the performance of those cards but I can attest to the fact that for the money these 570s are absolute beasts that run cool and quiet.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
2. MLAA? You mean that hacky AA that destroys HUDs? 3. You seriously consider dual bios a feature worth money? 4. TDP management? LOL Redeemed, that is the lamest set of "features" I have ever seen. What is next? A remote control for the fan called "Astro Thermal Management"? The features NVIDIA cards offer actually dramatically change the gaming experience for the better. I'll buy EyeFinity being nice, but I bet you still want two to run modern games at 1080P spanned.
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
|
Quote:
1: Physx 2: 3D gimmick vision 3: "average TDP 244 watts!" Reality, 350 watts. 4: $530 price tag, less performance for more money than a more than year old 5970! 5: Half rate DP!... which still manages to be less than the competition at quarter rate. 6: 5-10% faster... 50% more money. Cool story bro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Radeforce GTX7970
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,346
|
Works just fine( over 30fps)with max settings at 1920x1080.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @3.8GHz|Corsair H50|MSI X58 Platinum|3x2GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 7-8-7-20|Gigabyte Radeon 7970 OC 3GB windforce|Samsung SSD 830 256GB/Intel SSD X25M 80GB|Seagate Ext. 2TB eSata|Corsair TX 750W|Microsoft Wireless Laser Desktop 7000|Silverstone Grandia GD-01 MX Black|Dell UltraSharp U2412M| Windows 7 x64 Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
__________________
Inter Q9950@stock. Scythe CPU cooler.4gigs Corsair ddr2 1066. Segate 1tb drive. Ati Theater Pro 650. Evga GTX460 768@845mhz. Win 7 64 Professional. Dell 2007wfp S-IPS. Dell P1130. Razer Deathadder. Ducky 87 key mechanical keyboard. Xbox 360 controller for windows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
tRollo been raeped. In his defense, though- 3DVision is awesome- I wish I had the money to afford a 3 monitor 3D setup. Man that'd add a whole new level to games. I'm sure even aged titles like HL1 would look amazing on such a setup. And PhysX *can* be huge, if a form of it is implemented on the next gen consoles. Furthermore nVidia does own the fastest single-GPU card available. And, honestly, I do prefer nVidia's drivers over ATi's. Though Catalyst is far from a hassle. My point, I'm not trying to bash any company. But Rollo's blantant bias should be obvious. Rollo, ATi's features are hardly as poor as you imply. nVidia has solid offerings, as does ATi. If it weren't for EyeFinity you'd not have 3D Surround. You bash and belittle ATi's cards as if they were comparable to a Cirrus Logic 2D PCI VGA. Honestly it boils down to personal preference. Both companies have incredible offerings. ATi' happens to own the price erformance segment. nVidia dominates in raw power. Both companies have incredible features with their products. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Ngemu Mod
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,886
|
Quote:
http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/.../index.php?p=8
__________________
[i7 2600k @4.4ghertz][2x4 GB DDR3 1600][EVGA GTX570 1.280GB SC][EVGA GTX460 physx][Asrock Extreme7 Gen3 Z68][2xSeagate 160 Gb SATA HD raid0][Seagate 250 GB SATA2 HD][Sony Bravia 40' 1080p LCD HDTV][NEC 3520a DVD+-DLw][Windows 7 Ultimate x64][Rosewill 1000w] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,107
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
The only thing AMD has that is comparable is EyeFinity, which is great in it's 3 panel form. I just have serious doubts a single 6970 can drive three 1080P monitors adequately on modern games. I also think I'd rather have two NVIDIA GPUs to drive three panels because they could be 120Hz panels for 3d, and I could have PhysX effects with my 3 panels to raise the immersion in the game. (and ATi has their Display Port limitations as well) Bios switch? The answer to the question no one outside the AMD RMA department asked. Not many people flash bioses as they can OC cards without doing so. TDP management? I live in America where my electricity costs eight cents a KWh. So every ten hours I game on a card that uses 100W more than another card, I spend eight cents. Every 1000 hours costs eight bucks. Errr...oh noes? Eight whole bucks! The cost of the tip at lunch or a haircut, pocket change. And yet for years now ATi fans the world over yell about a couple watts of electricity like it was the last straw that put them living in a van down by the river. The AMD feature set IS weak comparatively. There's nothing fan boy about it, it's just a fact.
__________________
Rig1: intel 990X + 2 X EVGA 3GB GTX580 + 3 X Acer GD235Hz 3D Vision Surround Rig 2: intel 2500K + NVIDIA GTX590 + Dell 3007 WFPHC [SIZE="1"]NVIDIA Focus Group Member [B]NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.[/B][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Radeforce GTX7970
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,346
|
Lets not make a decision buying thread into an endless flamewar.We have enough of those.
Both companies have great cards and each company has it pros and cons.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @3.8GHz|Corsair H50|MSI X58 Platinum|3x2GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 7-8-7-20|Gigabyte Radeon 7970 OC 3GB windforce|Samsung SSD 830 256GB/Intel SSD X25M 80GB|Seagate Ext. 2TB eSata|Corsair TX 750W|Microsoft Wireless Laser Desktop 7000|Silverstone Grandia GD-01 MX Black|Dell UltraSharp U2412M| Windows 7 x64 Pro |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|