|
|
#13 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
500Gb hybrid for $119 at Bestbuy. |
||
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
I'd rather spend $500 on a new graphics card. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
access times |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
It's a wittle baby!
|
The thing that SSD's bring is virtually instantaneous access times for OS files and critical programs. Except for a few, SSDs make virtually no difference in games.
I feel like myself and others are beating a dead horse here. It's your choice, but there is no substitute for an SSD for your OS. Velociraptors can't come close to touching that sort of speed. Also, remember that SSD's use almost no energy and are silent. Those are nice perks.
__________________
MadPistol's Rig AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (RB-C3) @ 4Ghz, 1.425 Vcore, 1.25V NB VID Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan) Gigabyte UD3H AM3 790GX motherboard XFX Radeon HD 5870 PNY XLR8 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600 G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600 Soundblaster X-Fi Fatality Titanium OCZ Vertex II 120GB SSD (OS drive) Western Digital 500GB Caviar (black) Western Digital 640GB Blue Samsung DVD burner Logitech MX performance mouse Logitech G15 keyboard Corsair HX 750-watt Modular PSU Antec Nine Hundred case Windows 7 Home Premium x64 ASUS MK241 24" LCD ACER X241W 24" LCD - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,776
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
I know it has 0.01ms access time as opposed to 15ms for a hard drive. There's no comparison. I would LOVE to have one, but it does NOT suit my needs. I NEED room over speed. I'll probably just end up getting 4 WD RE4 2TB drives and putting them into RAID 0 mode. I'll put 2 for my C drive and another 2 for my Storage. Or I can simply do RAID 5, but I prefer 2 separate arrays. Buying an SSD now is a waste of money. Next year there will be faster SSDs with more memory. It seems it quadruples in memory every year and the price also goes down, so why buy it now? Pretty soon Western Digital and Seagate will be making SSDs, though I'm sure they'll suck since they're a hard drive company and not a memory company like Corsair and OCZ. It will however bring prices down and competition is great. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,986
|
Wow guys- way to be a bunch of ass hats.
It's his money- let him spend it how he pleases. Offer advice, yes- but don't be a bunch of deuches just because he's spending his cash in a manner you disagree with. If he wants to sport a s754 Sempron, 64MB of RAM with a 500GB ATA100 8MB Cache HDD, while dropping a GTX590 in that bad boy let him. It's his money. Advise- but don't redicule, insult, or any other such crap. Dude, AngelGraves- if you can find a good deal on a used SSD I'd at least consider getting it. I'm in the same boat as you regarding needing capacity over speed. However, the two SSDs I have now I purchased from members here- the prices were spot on, and I've not regretted it at all. It does make a huge difference. If you cannot find a good deal on a used SSD, then don't bother. You'll be very pleased with those 2TB drives in RAID as you mentioned. You'll get good performance with lots of storage- I'd count that as a win in my book. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|