08-25-03, 04:35 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12
|
... a patch is fine, but it doesn't change anything like geowiz wrote.
Is there a petition anywhere? Why do we have to have petitions all the time? Why does no nVidia official respond? Micha |
|
|
|
|
08-25-03, 05:44 AM
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 8
|
http://www.petitiononline.com/nforce2/petition.html
1916 Signatures, hmm =D Although i'm afraid i've signed it twice now, once a long time ago I think :P |
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-03, 08:17 PM
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, Tx USA
Posts: 110
|
Kind'a makes our point
I'd have to say that the simple fact that the community (well, some of the talented ones) have "hacked" the nvnet and the NVIDIA_kernel module code to work with the 2.6.0 release and there is no apparent beta or official release from Nvidia that works with 2.6.0 supports some of our arguments.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Post working out problem with 40.xx trying to work problem out, ONLY system specs | b5fan | NVIDIA Windows Graphics Drivers | 11 | 10-19-02 09:17 AM |
| R9500 specs | sebazve | Other Desktop Graphics Cards | 15 | 10-17-02 04:20 AM |
| NVNET device not present, delaying activation | robothefan | NVIDIA Linux | 4 | 10-01-02 09:43 PM |
| nvnet drivers in kernel, not module? | xaphod | NVIDIA Linux | 2 | 08-10-02 12:03 PM |
| Problem with Ethernet (nvnet) driver for RH 7.3 | bernz | NVIDIA Linux | 4 | 08-05-02 10:18 AM |
