Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > CPUs, Motherboards And Memory

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-10-11, 01:56 AM   #1
wheeljack12
Registered User
 
wheeljack12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hamilton,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 1,199
Send a message via Skype™ to wheeljack12
Default snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/san...sor,13387.html
__________________
gigabyte g1.sniper 5 mb, 8gb ddr3-1866 mhz ram in dual channel,intel core i7 4790 3.6 ghz quad core cpu, asus gtx 780 3gb vc,OCZ vector 150 240 gb ssd x 2 in raid 0 (intel raid),antec hcg-850 850 watt 80 plus bronze psu,corsair carbide 500r white case,pioneer bdr-208 15x bluray writer, steelseries 6gv2 keyboard ,acer gv215hv 21.5 inch 1080p lcd monitor, zalman eclipse 8200dpi mouse,xbox 360 wired controller for windows,kingston 8gb usb 2.0 flash drive,windows 8.1 64 bit,creative labs sound blaster zxr pci-e sc,logitech s120 2.0 speakers

I'd rather walk with God in the Dark than shine in the light alone.
wheeljack12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-11, 09:26 AM   #2
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

http://vr-zone.com/articles/why-the-...ed-/13748.html

Quote:
There was disappointment in some of the enthusiasts' circles that the initial round of desktop Socket 2011 Sandy Bridge E processors have one quarter of their cores and cache disabled. So, instead of 8 cores with 20 MB L3 cache, you get just 6 cores with 15 MB L3 enabled. The reasons mentioned, better to say speculated, along the way, were anything from the yields on this large die, or Intel's preference to sell full 8 core versions to the more lucrative workstation and server Xeon market, or even the fact that desktop apps or environments can still barely use even those 6 cores, not to mention a full set of eight.

Why the initial desktop Sandy Bridge-E chips has only six (of eight) cores enabled?

There's another reason, that may top them all though - TDP. Yes, these are really big dies, with many cores and lots of cache - not as many as the Xeon E7 - Westmere-EX - series in the same 32 nm process, but E7's 10 cores and 30 MB cache top out at 2.4 GHz only. Here, we have an expectation that the full 8 core chip should still work at just above 3 GHz right at the announcement - at least in the '3-D workstations only' 150 W version. See the number? Now, well, desktops don't really go with more than 130 W TDP per socket these days, yet the per core clock has to be higher, to justify the migration from older Core i7, and to keep the difference with the LGA1155 4-core SB chips, as well as AMD Bulldozer.

So, to get 3.3 GHz or higher core speed, and fit it all into 130W TDP, a 6 core limit sounds about right for the current C series steppings at least. A future D stepping could enable higher clocks at the same TDP, or maybe enabling all the cores too at a similar speed. Intel's tradition for both Nehalem and Westmere was that, a quarter or two after the initial stepping, the next one would bring substantial improvements in frequency, or power, or both - usually one or two speed bumps within the same envelope. That was enough then, there's no reason to doubt it will be the same this time.

Else, we'd have to wait for the Ivy Bridge-E generation, still a year away...

Read more: http://vr-zone.com/articles/why-the-...#ixzz1b8xaSkYx
SNB-E will still be a whopper. But I guess we will have to wait for 8 core goodness from Intel.
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-11, 03:15 PM   #3
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

Quote:
Originally Posted by slaWter View Post
Yeah the 8 Core Xeons will follow later on, probably with a lower clock.

But the bad news about SNB-E doesn't stop here. The latest Gigabyte slides show 40 PCIe 2.x lanes instead of the once planed PCIe 3.0 support. First the cut back on the dedicated PCIe 3.0 storage link and now this.

I'll skip this generation altogether and wait for Ivy Bridge E next year.
What are the real world advantages of PCIe 3.0 compared to PCIe 2.x? Will you notice a difference with current available hardware?

Honestly I think the best thing about SNB-E is the quad channel DDR3 and the 6 cores with HT for 12 threads. That alone should be more than enough to saturate any video card(s).
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-11, 03:35 PM   #4
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

Quote:
Originally Posted by slaWter View Post
PCIe 3.0 will double the bandwidth per lane compared to 2.x.

For this platform, it would have allowed for a lot of highend and flexible (from a manufacturers point of view) PCIe layouts but from a Multi-GPU setup perspective it's not that important because there are already so many lanes available.

PCIe 3.0 will be killer for the smaller platform next year though! Those CPUs will offer less lanes so the new bandwidth will come in very handy for Multi-GPU systems. There won't be a need for third party chips like on most highend P67/Z68 boards anymore. The CPU will provide enough bandwidth per GPU, even for Tri-SLI setups

Right now, the only two major features remaining are the Quad Channel memory interface and the huge cache. 6 Cores with HT is nothing new.
Ok gotcha. That will be nice to eliminate third party chips for PCIe. But I disagree, 6 cores with HT is new for the consumer market. Only EE and high end chips had this before, which are generally too expensive for the majority of people.
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-11, 05:47 PM   #5
Viral
Registered User of Women
 
Viral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

I've lost any desire to pay over $400 for a CPU, so I think I'll probably wait out Ivy.
__________________
Q9550 w/ Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme | 4GB Team Xtreme Dark 800MHz CL4 | Gigabyte X48-DS5
ASUS Radeon 5870 | 240GB OCZ Vertex 2 | 1TB WD Green Power | BenQ V2400W 24" LCD
Corsair HX-1000w | LG GGW-H20L 6x DL Blu-Ray Burner/HD-DVD Reader | Coolermaster Cosmos S

Acer TravelMate 4002WNLCi: Pentium M 725 @ 1.6GHz | Mobility Radeon 9700/64MB | 2GB DDR400 | 15.4" WXGA
Viral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-11, 09:18 PM   #6
ViN86
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,486
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

This i7 950 at 4GHz is plenty fast for me. The 920 I have is D0, too, so if I needed more speed I could probably get the 920 up to 4.2GHz+. This 950 takes too much voltage to go over 4GHz, though.
ViN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-11, 10:50 AM   #7
Slytat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 354
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

Quote:
Originally Posted by slaWter View Post

I'll skip this generation altogether and wait for Ivy Bridge E next year.
I was stoked for this but as we get more and more info, I get less and less interested.

I don't think I'll be hopping on this either tbh, there isn't much to recommend it over the current EE chips and with Ivy Bridge and new Nvidia GPUs in the near(ish) future, I'll just wait and add some more SSD space instead
Slytat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-11, 10:53 AM   #8
Ninja Prime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
Default Re: snb-e now coming mid to late nov. 2011

Quote:
What are the real world advantages of PCIe 3.0 compared to PCIe 2.x?
The actual answer to that question is: None. There are no "real world" advantages, hardware/spec fanboys just want it for e-peen bragging rights on big numbers. Nothing uses the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0, maybe some giant quad processor Tesla board or other supercomputing accelerator. Nothing exists really that even supports it yet. As of the launch of SNB-E, there will be no reason for it. Probably why intel didn't bother to include it.
Ninja Prime is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.