Post your ASIC Quality. - Page 2

EciDemon · 01-30-12, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViN86

Also, values above 100% are a bug atm, so I wouldn't trust the current GPU-Z results. I'm sure the next release or two will fix it.

I wouldn't say it's bugged only that the scale isn't known yet, there's no reference points which means these vast differences in results we see now may actually be very insignificant.

But it'll be cool if he figures it out or get some assistance from the hardware manufacturers.

i SPY · 02-14-12, 11:53 AM

I had a feeling that 100.3% was too good to be true,

Now with gpu-z 0.59 its more accurate - 87.6%, also some extra info

lol if it were true 100.3% i bet i could use 1.018v or lower, instead 1.049v @ 900mhz.

Still very happy with that

ViN86 · 02-14-12, 01:00 PM

Nice, thanks for posting the update. So it looks like it's true that you can get better overclocking with lower ASIC values, but only if you have the cooling to pull it off.

02-14-12, 11:53 AM	#14
i SPY 007 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: You were sayin' Posts: 290	Re: Post your ASIC Quality. I had a feeling that 100.3% was too good to be true, Now with gpu-z 0.59 its more accurate - 87.6%, also some extra info lol if it were true 100.3% i bet i could use 1.018v or lower, instead 1.049v @ 900mhz. Still very happy with that __________________ intel Q9450 @ 3.656Ghz [1.3875v, LLC off]\| GA-X48-DS5 [Memory Enhance: Turbo]\|MSi N570GTX TwinFrozrIII OC/PowerEdition\|Kingston HyperX 4x2GB PC 8500 @ 1097Mhz [5-5-5-18, 2.25v]\| Creative X-FI Pro [SB046A]\| Tagan PipeRock 600w [48A]

02-14-12, 01:00 PM	#15
ViN86 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,486	Re: Post your ASIC Quality. Nice, thanks for posting the update. So it looks like it's true that you can get better overclocking with lower ASIC values, but only if you have the cooling to pull it off.