Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-05, 04:36 AM   #121
Clevor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 220
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

I've upgraded to a 3700+ San Diego running 264x11 or 2904 mhz, 2-2-2-5 with 2x512 XMS3500. Got my best score so far. Keep in mind this is a single X850XT PE at default clock. Board is the DFI Ultra-D.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	3700+at2904_XMSat264_Aquamark.jpg
Views:	272
Size:	58.6 KB
ID:	12288  
__________________
DFI SLI-D
510-2 BIOS
FX-57, 0530APMW
300x10 at default VCORE (1.36 volts)
2x512MB GSkill FF at 2.5-3-3-7 (2.8 VDIMM)
X850XT PE at default clock
Corsair HC200

SuperPI 32M=24'14"
SuperPI 1M=27.187"
Clevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-05, 02:17 PM   #122
Huigie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 27
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by newls1
Here is my new record high....

Private Measurement:
DATE: 2005-06-27 19:41:45 Set this Measurement to be public. Delete this measurement
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-55 Processor CR: 2893 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU CM: 6 / 4 MHz VRAM: 251 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.7713
# 1 AquaMark Score: 99596 (CPU: 13288, GFX: 15924) FPS: 99.60 TPS: 29981 K Compare
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High View
Aquamark compare url?
__________________
Case: Lian Li PC70, Panaflo fans
Cooling: Watercooling, CPU=NexXxoS XP, GPU=MCW50, Pump=modded (bigger inlet) MCP350
PSU: Sharkoon 535Watt PSU
Mobo/bios: DFI NF4 Ultra D 510-2fix
CPU: AMD FX-57 @ 3000MHz (250x12) - 1.35V x 113%
Mem: OCZ PC4000 EL Gold VX 1:1 @ 2.2.5.2 - 3.3V
Disks: WD Raptor 74GB /Hitachi 7k250 80GB
GPU: XFX 7800GTX @ 520x1360

200-enable-2-2-5-2-7-auto-02-02-01-02-3120-auto-enabled-increased-128-8-auto-7-5-16-disable-16x-7x-disable

AquaMark score 106195 (CPU: 14836, GFX: 16536)
Huigie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-05, 02:25 PM   #123
newls1
Registered User
 
newls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 596
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huigie
Aquamark compare url?
I'll try this, but I think you'll need my Password? Do you think this is a good score?


http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1362872234
__________________
ASUS P5Q-PRO @ 408FSB / Q6700 @ 3.71GHz AIR COOLED / eVGA GTX295 @ 725c*1585s*2400mem / 4GB G.SKILL PC8500 @ DDR1025 / AUDIGY4 / WD640GB / WD80GB / 28" Hanns-G 3ms LCD
newls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-05, 11:04 AM   #124
SH64
MAXIMUM TECH
 
SH64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,202
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

w00t 90fps breached!
FX-55/7800GTX SLI/2GB DDR400 .. all stock
score = 93,085
GFX = 14,877 , CPU = 11,967
__________________


- "My name is RAM and my tank is full"

http://warhawk64nv.mybrute.com/ <-- pupils go thaarrr! Or,
http://silenthunter64.mybrute.com
SH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-05, 05:46 AM   #125
Clevor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 220
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

With two 3700+ San Diegos running 2900-2950 mhz, what do you do when you get bored? Hadda get an FX-57. Finally broke 90k with a single card: an X850XT PE at default clock. See sig for details .

Why is my sig blank??? Specs here:

DFI SLI-D
510-2 BIOS
FX-57 0530APMW
300x10 at default VCORE (1.36 volts)
2x512MB Gskill FFs at 2.5-3-3-7, 2.8 VDIMM
X850XT PE at default clock
Corsair HC200
OCZ 430W Powerstream
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	FX57at300times10_defvolt_TCCD_Aquamarkb.jpg
Views:	187
Size:	75.4 KB
ID:	13524  Click image for larger version

Name:	FX57at300times10_defvolt_TCCD_32Mb.jpg
Views:	158
Size:	165.3 KB
ID:	13525  
Clevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-05, 07:52 PM   #126
orbitech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread


This is with 81.29 drivers GTX@485/1300
Multi threaded drivers goodness
__________________
A64 x2 4400+ @2.7GHz (xp90c ) (10X270)
DFI LanParty SLI - DR (bios v 623-3)
2x512 Mushkin Redline 3500 (2-2-2-5) 9:10
MSI GeForce 7800GTX
Antec Neopower 480W
Coolermaster Stacker
Audigy 2 ZS @ Logitech Z-680
Leadtek Winfast PVR2000
WD 36.7 SATA Raptor
2x80 WD 7200rpm
Plextor 708A , NEC 3520A
Aerocool Gatewatch Panel
HP printer scanner
orbitech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-05, 09:25 PM   #127
Clevor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 220
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Not bad Orbitech, as that score is pretty much all video card.

I need to set up two PCI-Express rigs so I have a 7800 GTX on the way. I bought an XFX OCed model running 490/1.3 from the factory. We'll see what numbers it will put out on an A64 at 300x10, 2.5-3-3-7.

I think I can break 100k with an X850XT PE if I overclock the card and maybe run 3200 mhz on the CPU, which will need phase.

Breaking 100k will be pretty easy in SLI.
__________________
DFI SLI-D
510-2 BIOS
FX-57, 0530APMW
300x10 at default VCORE (1.36 volts)
2x512MB GSkill FF at 2.5-3-3-7 (2.8 VDIMM)
X850XT PE at default clock
Corsair HC200

SuperPI 32M=24'14"
SuperPI 1M=27.187"
Clevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-05, 12:13 PM   #128
orbitech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clevor
Not bad Orbitech, as that score is pretty much all video card.

I need to set up two PCI-Express rigs so I have a 7800 GTX on the way. I bought an XFX OCed model running 490/1.3 from the factory. We'll see what numbers it will put out on an A64 at 300x10, 2.5-3-3-7.

I think I can break 100k with an X850XT PE if I overclock the card and maybe run 3200 mhz on the CPU, which will need phase.

Breaking 100k will be pretty easy in SLI.
Well it seems like the score is GFX only but the work FOR THE GPU(VERTEX PROCESSING)is being done by the dual core and the multi threaded drivers

I get an avg of 93.000 w/o the multithreaded drivers, which give a huge boost in gpu assigning work on the second core... I luv my Toledo and if I up the core beyond 1.55v(which I don't wanna do for the time being) I can hit 2.85-2.9 on air!!
Good luck with ur single monster FX-57
__________________
A64 x2 4400+ @2.7GHz (xp90c ) (10X270)
DFI LanParty SLI - DR (bios v 623-3)
2x512 Mushkin Redline 3500 (2-2-2-5) 9:10
MSI GeForce 7800GTX
Antec Neopower 480W
Coolermaster Stacker
Audigy 2 ZS @ Logitech Z-680
Leadtek Winfast PVR2000
WD 36.7 SATA Raptor
2x80 WD 7200rpm
Plextor 708A , NEC 3520A
Aerocool Gatewatch Panel
HP printer scanner
orbitech is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-05, 05:18 PM   #129
Clevor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 220
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbitech
Well it seems like the score is GFX only but the work FOR THE GPU(VERTEX PROCESSING)is being done by the dual core and the multi threaded drivers

I get an avg of 93.000 w/o the multithreaded drivers, which give a huge boost in gpu assigning work on the second core... I luv my Toledo and if I up the core beyond 1.55v(which I don't wanna do for the time being) I can hit 2.85-2.9 on air!!
Good luck with ur single monster FX-57
The overclock on your card helps a lot too. The 7800 GTX typically gives only a 10-15% boost over the X850XT PE in FiveMark (all five Marks and Aquamark), but a 15% boost should take me over the top.

If you are indeed stable at 2.85 enough to run SuperPI 32M than you have one of the very best CPUs on Xtremesystems even - air or water. I am staying away from the dual cores as the majority of even the 4800+s can only do 2.7-2.8. Basically it's twice as hard to get a good overclocking chip. Until AMD can come up with a better way to implement dual core, I'm keeping away. An ole 800 fsb HT P4 overclocked from 3.0 to 3.9 gig gives outstanding multitasking, albeit by virtual CPUs.
__________________
DFI SLI-D
510-2 BIOS
FX-57, 0530APMW
300x10 at default VCORE (1.36 volts)
2x512MB GSkill FF at 2.5-3-3-7 (2.8 VDIMM)
X850XT PE at default clock
Corsair HC200

SuperPI 32M=24'14"
SuperPI 1M=27.187"
Clevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-05, 07:55 PM   #130
orbitech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clevor
The overclock on your card helps a lot too. The 7800 GTX typically gives only a 10-15% boost over the X850XT PE in FiveMark (all five Marks and Aquamark), but a 15% boost should take me over the top.

If you are indeed stable at 2.85 enough to run SuperPI 32M than you have one of the very best CPUs on Xtremesystems even - air or water. I am staying away from the dual cores as the majority of even the 4800+s can only do 2.7-2.8. Basically it's twice as hard to get a good overclocking chip. Until AMD can come up with a better way to implement dual core, I'm keeping away. An ole 800 fsb HT P4 overclocked from 3.0 to 3.9 gig gives outstanding multitasking, albeit by virtual CPUs.
I can do 2.85 on air with 1.65-1.7 and succesfully ran super pi 32m(haven't primed it yet though and I have issues with ram which I want to ran at 2-2-2-5). But I ain't gonna run this because as I said by any means I don't wanna up the core more than 1.55 for 24/7. I've seen at least 2 more 4400+ @2.9 on air too, so this is not something unusual.
As for the dualies being able to do only 2.8-2.9 well that's true but honestly have you seen a dualie, game and multitask at those speeds? And OMG what are you talkin about AMD finding a better way to implement dual cores? Today AMD dual cores DESTROY by far Intel dualies in virtually EVERYTHING!!.Try Linux and not (windows xp and H/T optimized programs sponsored by Intel to see the real power of AMD dual core multitasking ) Of course even an Intel single core might still seem to multitask better in Win XP, we are talking about a platform that was based and optimized by and for Intel architecture .. This will not be the case with Vista though. Microsoft has no other way now that AMD has the upper hand in REAL multitasking and superiority days of Intel in this sector are now past.. Don't forget the multi threaded drivers that will give a fine boost soon. Doom3 for example boosted at 16x12 from 102 fps to 114.
__________________
A64 x2 4400+ @2.7GHz (xp90c ) (10X270)
DFI LanParty SLI - DR (bios v 623-3)
2x512 Mushkin Redline 3500 (2-2-2-5) 9:10
MSI GeForce 7800GTX
Antec Neopower 480W
Coolermaster Stacker
Audigy 2 ZS @ Logitech Z-680
Leadtek Winfast PVR2000
WD 36.7 SATA Raptor
2x80 WD 7200rpm
Plextor 708A , NEC 3520A
Aerocool Gatewatch Panel
HP printer scanner
orbitech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-05, 08:34 PM   #131
Clevor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 220
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbitech
I can do 2.85 on air with 1.65-1.7 and succesfully ran super pi 32m(haven't primed it yet though and I have issues with ram which I want to ran at 2-2-2-5). But I ain't gonna run this because as I said by any means I don't wanna up the core more than 1.55 for 24/7. I've seen at least 2 more 4400+ @2.9 on air too, so this is not something unusual.
As for the dualies being able to do only 2.8-2.9 well that's true but honestly have you seen a dualie, game and multitask at those speeds? And OMG what are you talkin about AMD finding a better way to implement dual cores? Today AMD dual cores DESTROY by far Intel dualies in virtually EVERYTHING!!.Try Linux and not (windows xp and H/T optimized programs sponsored by Intel to see the real power of AMD dual core multitasking ) Of course even an Intel single core might still seem to multitask better in Win XP, we are talking about a platform that was based on Intel to be created.. This will not be the case with Vista though. Microsoft has no other way now that AMD has the upper hand in REAL multitasking and superiority days of Intel in this sector are now past.. Don't forget the multi threaded drivers that will give a fine boost soon. Doom3 for example boosted at 16x12 from 102 fps to 114.
What are your load temps? I hear the X2s run real hot. So do FXs, but not so much at 1.36 where I'm running it.

I mean dual cores with better overclocking. The only way now is you gotta get two good cores. It's hard enough as is getting one good core. I've not been keeping up with the Intel side on their dual cores and how well they overclock.

I don't multitask or game, mainly run benches. I know I tested an ole 3.0C running 3.85 gig and I could run SuperPI 32M, copy over a DriveImage, run Sandra burn-in, and cruise the Net with no slowdown. Sure HT ain't AMDs dual core, but this kind of multitasking has been available for awhile now, and it's dirt cheap if you can even find an ole 'C' chip to buy.

Right now I'm playing with an ancient 2.40C running 315, 5:4, 2.5-3-3-7 on an IS7, on phase. When you open up two instances of CPUZ, it opens up instantly with no lag on the mouse. Even on the FX-57, you get a ragged mouse movement until both instances open up. I own both Intel and AMD, so I have no bone to pick. I'm hardly an Intel fanboy when I have both an A64 and XP-M rig. For my purposes, I don't really need AMD's dual core. I hear mainly PCMark2004 gets really good marks, though from what you say now, maybe some 3D benches will improve. I considered a 4800+ since it was even cheaper than my FX-57, but I passed. If guys on XS couldn't get good clocks, plus the heat, forget it.
__________________
DFI SLI-D
510-2 BIOS
FX-57, 0530APMW
300x10 at default VCORE (1.36 volts)
2x512MB GSkill FF at 2.5-3-3-7 (2.8 VDIMM)
X850XT PE at default clock
Corsair HC200

SuperPI 32M=24'14"
SuperPI 1M=27.187"
Clevor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-05, 06:43 AM   #132
orbitech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 20
Default Re: Official AquaMark 3 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clevor
What are your load temps? I hear the X2s run real hot. So do FXs, but not so much at 1.36 where I'm running it.

I mean dual cores with better overclocking. The only way now is you gotta get two good cores. It's hard enough as is getting one good core. I've not been keeping up with the Intel side on their dual cores and how well they overclock.

I don't multitask or game, mainly run benches. I know I tested an ole 3.0C running 3.85 gig and I could run SuperPI 32M, copy over a DriveImage, run Sandra burn-in, and cruise the Net with no slowdown. Sure HT ain't AMDs dual core, but this kind of multitasking has been available for awhile now, and it's dirt cheap if you can even find an ole 'C' chip to buy.

Right now I'm playing with an ancient 2.40C running 315, 5:4, 2.5-3-3-7 on an IS7, on phase. When you open up two instances of CPUZ, it opens up instantly with no lag on the mouse. Even on the FX-57, you get a ragged mouse movement until both instances open up. I own both Intel and AMD, so I have no bone to pick. I'm hardly an Intel fanboy when I have both an A64 and XP-M rig. For my purposes, I don't really need AMD's dual core. I hear mainly PCMark2004 gets really good marks, though from what you say now, maybe some 3D benches will improve. I considered a 4800+ since it was even cheaper than my FX-57, but I passed. If guys on XS couldn't get good clocks, plus the heat, forget it.
Peace m8. Nowhere did I imply that u r an Intel fan, and if it seemed so I'm really sorry. Just stating facts.
Now as far as concerns temps my idle are 38 and load are 55-57max)(@2.75) and at stock 28 idle and 42-43max at load. It is true though that after 2.75 Toledos ran really hot and need more vcore, which I don't want to do.
I do have to agree with you also that a single core Intel(I have an old 2.8c ran at 3.5) is the best option for price/perf right now for multitasking since H/T is involved with many applications in WinXP as I said. I was just stating that if price is no issue and we are talking about the best desktop cpus out there(no matter single or dual core) AMD has the best ones regarding performance.
It depends on what you want though...
A cheap single Intel can multitask better than a single AMD64 for sure with Win XP.
A cheap single AMD64 can sure game or ran many bussiness aplications better than an Intel equivalent.
An AMD dual core is better at virtually everything than Intel equivalent ones and keep up at high standards of performance in gaming compared many times to FXs performance.An 3800+ x2 is a wise solution for everyone upgrading now. With logic price and extreme o/cbility makes it unbeatable in my eyes.
I think dual cores o/c and o/c damn well EVEN ON AIR just like the single 0.09 ones. You can't expect every single Toledo or Manchester to go beyond 500-600MHz on air. That's way too optimistic don't you think? And you can't expect a 4800+ or a 4400+ (which ran @2.4 and 2.2 respectively) to reach o/c limits of a FX-57(2.8 stock). If that was the case then what would be the purpose of existance of an FX)? In the future when clocks will be higher for dualies and SMP games appear FXs will be replaced by dual FXs.
I would like to see many benches if you go for a 7800GTX with ur FX-57. It's the only useful comparison for my dualie performance compared to the highest end single core model, so keep in touch ok?
P.S : You said you bought an XFX 7800GTX. Can you plz give me when you can a score from ur o/ced FX-57 with a single 7800GTX in Aquamark? I really want to see the benefit from the multi threaded drivers.
__________________
A64 x2 4400+ @2.7GHz (xp90c ) (10X270)
DFI LanParty SLI - DR (bios v 623-3)
2x512 Mushkin Redline 3500 (2-2-2-5) 9:10
MSI GeForce 7800GTX
Antec Neopower 480W
Coolermaster Stacker
Audigy 2 ZS @ Logitech Z-680
Leadtek Winfast PVR2000
WD 36.7 SATA Raptor
2x80 WD 7200rpm
Plextor 708A , NEC 3520A
Aerocool Gatewatch Panel
HP printer scanner
orbitech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official GeForce GTX 670 Review and Discussion Thread MikeC NVIDIA GeForce 600 Series 23 10-28-12 10:19 AM
Official nForce 2 Thread Matthyahuw CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 148 04-16-03 04:39 AM
Official Linux driver 1.0-3123 thread bammbamm808 NVIDIA Linux 126 12-05-02 06:21 PM
Official Grand Theft Auto 3 thread volt Gaming Central 6 08-01-02 07:04 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.