|
|
#1 | |
|
007
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: You were sayin'
Posts: 290
|
[Version]
Signature = "$Windows NT$" Provider = %NVIDIA% ClassGUID = {4D36E968-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318} Class = Display DriverVer = 03/22/2012, 8.17.12.9635 CatalogFile = NV_DISP.CAT --------------------------------------------------------- Windows Vista/Windows 7 x32 http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/quadr...driver-uk.html Windows Vista/Windows 7 x64 http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/quadr...driver-uk.html INF x64 (windows vista/wndows7), international; all geforce gpus except 680gtx. http://www.mediafire.com/?96q84fbb9l8b5jn 296.10 r295_43-27 296.36 r_295_00-302 Its a bit older branch compared 296.10 but it has newer cuda 4.2.1 vs 4.1.1 in 296.10. ![]() I made a quick test, RE5 fixed benchmark and they look very good.. Nice lowest fps no weird fps drops and they're a little faster compared 296.10 (2fps on avg).
__________________
intel Q9450 @ 3.656Ghz [1.3875v, LLC off]| GA-X48-DS5 [Memory Enhance: Turbo]|MSi N570GTX TwinFrozrIII OC/PowerEdition|Kingston HyperX 4x2GB PC 8500 @ 1097Mhz [5-5-5-18, 2.25v]| Creative X-FI Pro [SB046A]| Tagan PipeRock 600w [48A] |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|