Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-03, 10:06 PM   #13
Seminole99ns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Default

I love it! I can play all my games, with smooth framerates. It cost me 149.99 at bestbuy. Not bad for this card!
Seminole99ns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-03, 10:12 PM   #14
Seminole99ns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Default

3dmark 2001 with 4403 was 2,685. The 51.75 drivers are stable and fast on my machine who cares if nvidia turned them up for direct x 9.0. All companies Nvidia and Ati cheat a little--lets get over it and start playing and enjoying our cards!
Seminole99ns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-03, 10:14 PM   #15
Kev1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 679
Smile Nice scores Seminole99ns!

Kev1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-03, 10:26 PM   #16
Hellbinder
 
Hellbinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CDA
Posts: 1,510
Default

Quote:
3dmark 2001 with 4403 was 2,685. The 51.75 drivers are stable and fast on my machine who cares if nvidia turned them up for direct x 9.0. All companies Nvidia and Ati cheat a little--lets get over it and start playing and enjoying our cards!
They are lowing IQ on Dx8 in some cases as well as DX9.

BUT... Having said that.....

Everyone has the right to Enjoy the products they buy. If You are totally happy with your card thats great.

(I would caution you though that if you have any hopes of playing HL2 with full DX9 effects (Which you can do with a 9600pro) you may want to consider a trade in)
__________________
Overam Mirage 4700
3.2ghz P4 HT
SIS 748FX Chipset 800mhz FSB
1Gig DDR-400
60Gig 7200RPM HD
Radeon 9600M Turbo 128 (400/250)
Catalyst 4.2
Latest good read. [url]http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=[/url]

Last edited by Hellbinder; 09-23-03 at 11:03 PM.
Hellbinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-03, 10:49 PM   #17
digitalwanderer
 
digitalwanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 4,944
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hellbinder
They are lowing IQ on Dx8 in some cases as well as DX9.

BUT... Having said that.....

Everyone has the right to Enjoy they products they buy. If You are totally happy with your card thats great.

(I would caution you though that if you have any hopes of playing HL2 with full DX9 effects (Which you can do with a 9600pro) you may want to consider a trade in)
Hey, wait a minute! I thought I was the good cop and you were the bad cop...
__________________
[SIZE=1][I]"It was very important to us that NVIDIA did not know exactly where to aim. As a result they seem to have over-engineered in some aspects creating a power-hungry monster which is going to be very expensive for them to manufacture. We have a beautifully balanced piece of hardware that beats them on pure performance, cost, scalability, future mobile relevance, etc. That's all because they didn't know what to aim at."
-R.Huddy[/I] [/SIZE]
digitalwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-03, 11:24 PM   #18
stncttr908
Registered User
 
stncttr908's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 4,496
Send a message via AIM to stncttr908
Default

I have a question for you...why are you running a P4 2.6C with an Intel 845 board?
__________________
PC - | Core i7-2600K @ stock | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3 | 4GB Patriot Sector 5 DDR3 | Galaxy GTX 460 1GB @ stock | Corsair Force 120GB SSD | Seagate 1TB 7200RPM | 320GB Seagate 7200.10 | 2x Seagate 500GB USB 2.0 | Lite-On 20x SATA DVD+RW | Silverstone TJ-09 | Corsair 620W PSU | Logitech Z-5500s | Sennheiser HD-570 headphones | Samsung 2494LW |

Laptop - | Dell Inspiron 1420 | C2D T7300 (2.0GHz, 4MB cache) | 2GB DDR2-667 | 160GB 7200RPM HDD | DVD +/- RW | 14.1" WXGA+ (1440x900) | Broadcom 802.11g | NVIDIA 8400M GS 128MB |
stncttr908 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-03, 04:12 AM   #19
-=DVS=-
.:. Lafiel .:.
 
-=DVS=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outerspace
Posts: 3,009
Talking

I get 4500 in 3dmark 2003 , without any overcloak wiht setup below & good old Radeon 9700 Pro
__________________
.:. Lian Li X500FX .:. i7 2600k .:. PNY GTX 680 .:. Corsair DDR3 8GB .:. Silverstone 800W PSU .:. Asus P8P67-M Pro .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
-=DVS=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-03, 06:51 AM   #20
goofer456
 
goofer456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 180
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by -=DVS=-
I get 4500 in 3dmark 2003 , without any overcloak wiht setup below & good old Radeon 9700 Pro
I get ~4700. However the R9700 is (still) much more expensive than the FX5600Pro. So the comparison is not really honest
goofer456 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What You Can Expect From GeForce GRID News Archived News Items 0 06-04-12 05:20 PM
Nvidia GeForce 301.42 WHQL drivers DSC NVIDIA Windows Graphics Drivers 5 05-29-12 11:12 PM
New GPU from Nvidia Announced Today, the GeForce GTX 670 News Archived News Items 0 05-10-12 02:50 PM
Gainward Unleashes the Sexy GeForce GTX 670 Phantom Graphics Card, Also launches the News Archived News Items 0 05-10-12 10:28 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.