Go Back   nV News Forums > Hardware Forums > Benchmarking And Overclocking

Newegg Daily Deals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-03-03, 11:55 PM   #13
GJH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aussie
Posts: 4
Default

3.7s i think i put in my pro the reason im asking when i did the 3dmark03 with out the patch on my pro it went up 2 to 300 pts and on my A350 and driver 52.16 it was the same score with patch or with out it .
GJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-03, 11:58 PM   #14
Hellbinder
 
Hellbinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CDA
Posts: 1,510
Default

Yes.. Please run the same battery of tests on the Cat 3.7 or Cat 3.8.

Actually, I would use the latest OMEGA release based on Cat 3.9's

I am curious to see how the results compare.
__________________
Overam Mirage 4700
3.2ghz P4 HT
SIS 748FX Chipset 800mhz FSB
1Gig DDR-400
60Gig 7200RPM HD
Radeon 9600M Turbo 128 (400/250)
Catalyst 4.2
Latest good read. [url]http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=[/url]
Hellbinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-03, 11:59 PM   #15
The Baron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

3.6 supported the 9600 Pro. But that might have been the first one. I'm not sure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 05:21 AM   #16
dan2097
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 205
Default

Does anti detect not work with the 52.16?
dan2097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 09:05 AM   #17
jbirney
Registered User
 
jbirney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,430
Default

Nice work SH!!!!
jbirney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 09:27 AM   #18
Hanners
Elite Bastard
 
Hanners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GJH
Hey Stealth can you do tests on ati drivers on 3dmark03 and let us no what you find please mate .
I can give it a try with the Cat 3.8s - Probably won't have time for any other driver revisions though. I assume Antidetect still works for new ATi drivers?
__________________
Owner / Editor-in-Chief - Elite Bastards
Hanners is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 10:37 AM   #19
Hellbinder
 
Hellbinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CDA
Posts: 1,510
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dan2097
Does anti detect not work with the 52.16?
Nvidia Obviously encrypted the drives as to prevent exactly this type of comparrison.

There is really only one reason to do something like that. Usually its if you are trying to hide something.
__________________
Overam Mirage 4700
3.2ghz P4 HT
SIS 748FX Chipset 800mhz FSB
1Gig DDR-400
60Gig 7200RPM HD
Radeon 9600M Turbo 128 (400/250)
Catalyst 4.2
Latest good read. [url]http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTc4LDE=[/url]
Hellbinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 10:43 AM   #20
dan2097
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hellbinder
Nvidia Obviously encrypted the drives as to prevent exactly this type of comparrison.

There is really only one reason to do something like that. Usually its if you are trying to hide something.
Looks like more work for Unwinder
dan2097 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-03, 02:50 PM   #21
dan2097
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 205
Default

StealthHawk: could you see whether anti detect has any effect on aquamark 3 on the 44.03, 45.23 and 51.75 drivers?
dan2097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 03:49 PM   #22
The Baron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hellbinder
Nvidia Obviously encrypted the drives as to prevent exactly this type of comparrison.

There is really only one reason to do something like that. Usually its if you are trying to hide something.
Unwinder devised a way to remove the encryption, but still, antidetect has no effect on any of the drivers past 44.65 as far as I know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 04:29 PM   #23
cthellis
Hoopy frood
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Baron
Unwinder devised a way to remove the encryption, but still, antidetect has no effect on any of the drivers past 44.65 as far as I know.
Um... According to the numbers StealthHawk's reporting they certainly seem to!

Great job, SH. I love mind-numbing amounts of results to chew on. No one has yet said "we're not worthy!" in the thread yet, so I suppose I'll have to supply it.
cthellis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 04:37 PM   #24
dan2097
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Unwinder devised a way to remove the encryption, but still, antidetect has no effect on any of the drivers past 44.65 as far as I know.
Unwinder said if I remember correctly that as a side effect of creating "detonator decoder" that anti detect now worked again on the detonator drivers. Although that was said when the 45.23s were still official. Stealthhawks results show that it certainly has some effect on the 51.75s

EDIT: im not sure I said this earlier, but well done Stealthawk on some top quality investigation.
dan2097 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(Quick Test) PLA Direct3D 11 Benchmark (GTX680 vs GTX580 vs GTX480) News Archived News Items 0 06-06-12 10:30 AM
Passion Leads Army: DX 11 and GPU PhysX Benchmark News Archived News Items 0 05-28-12 09:00 PM
Anyone benchmark KT266, KT266A, KT333 and KT400? Needa916 CPUs, Motherboards And Memory 7 10-09-02 09:34 AM
3d benchmark se cricket Benchmarking And Overclocking 3 08-31-02 12:02 AM
Network/Lan benchmark wanted. Any Input? Switch Benchmarking And Overclocking 10 07-30-02 10:54 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.